Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Characters / FantasticBeastsGrindelwaldsArmy

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ReverseGrip: Throughout the third film, Credence holds his wand in this manner, especially during combat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Voiced by:''' Creator/HiroakiHirata (Japanese, in the ''Fantastic Beasts'' films), Bruno Choël (French, in the ''Fantastic Beasts'' films), Luis Posada (European Spanish, ''Fantastic Beasts''), Enrique Cazorla (European Spanish, ''Deathly Hallows''), Creator/RicardoTejedo (Latin American Spanish, ''Fantastic Beasts''), Ernesto Casillas (Latin American Spanish, ''Deathly Hallows''), Marco Antônio Costa (Brazilian Portuguese, ''Fantastic Beasts''), Jorge Lucas (Brazilian Portuguese, ''Crimes of Grindelwald''), Creator/MarioMonjardim (Brazilian Portuguese, ''Deathly Hallows Part 1'') \\

to:

'''Voiced by:''' Creator/HiroakiHirata (Japanese, in the ''Fantastic Beasts'' films), Bruno Choël (French, in the ''Fantastic Beasts'' films), Luis Posada (European Spanish, ''Fantastic Beasts''), Enrique Cazorla (European Spanish, ''Deathly Hallows''), Creator/RicardoTejedo (Latin American Spanish, ''Fantastic Beasts''), Beasts'' and ''Crimes of Grindelwald''), Creator/GerardoReyero (Latin American Spanish, ''The Secrets of Dumbledore'') , Ernesto Casillas (Latin American Spanish, ''Deathly Hallows''), Marco Antônio Costa (Brazilian Portuguese, ''Fantastic Beasts''), Jorge Lucas (Brazilian Portuguese, ''Crimes of Grindelwald''), Creator/MarioMonjardim (Brazilian Portuguese, ''Deathly Hallows Part 1'') \\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FirstNameBasis: When he meets Dumbledore at the restaurant, he calls him Albus, as is fitting for a romantic partner. After [[spoiler:the blood troth breaks]] he switches to calling him Dumbledore, signifying the final rift in their relationship.

to:

* FirstNameBasis: When he meets Dumbledore at the restaurant, he calls him Albus, as is fitting for a romantic partner. After [[spoiler:the blood troth breaks]] breaks]], he switches to calling him Dumbledore, signifying the final rift in their relationship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FirstNameBasis: When he meets Dumbledore at the restaurant, he calls him Albus, as is fitting for a romantic partner. After [[spoiler:the blood troth breaks]] he switches to calling him Dumbledore, signifying the final rift in their relationship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Although both are described as handsome in their younger years, Voldemort is TallDarkAndHandsome while Grindelwald is blonde. Voldemort's forays into dark magic twists his appearance into something akin to a snake or a living corpse but Grindelwald keeps his normal human features and remains handsome into middle age, although pre-recast his design had bleached skin and hair, though never to the extent of making him look inhuman. The Mikkelsen version of the character has Mikkelsen's rugged good looks and charismatic demeanor, which makes him all the more dangerous as a way to manipulate people into believing his benevolence.

to:

** Although both are described as handsome in their younger years, Voldemort is TallDarkAndHandsome while Grindelwald is blonde. Voldemort's forays into dark magic twists his appearance into something akin to a snake or a living corpse but Grindelwald keeps his normal human features and remains handsome into middle age, although pre-recast his design had bleached skin and hair, though never to the extent of making him look inhuman. The Mikkelsen version of the character has Mikkelsen's rugged good looks and suave, charismatic demeanor, appearance, which makes him all the more dangerous as a way to manipulate people into believing his benevolence.



* FaceOfAnAngelMindOfADemon: Every description of Grindelwald as a young man credits him as very handsome, and in the first two films, he's portrayed by Johnny Depp, whose handsome features are not greatly marred by Grindelwald's colourless appearance. Once Mikkelsen took over the role, he became more conventionally attractive. If nothing else, Grindelwald's good looks were a big part of what won him the heart of a young Albus Dumbledore. Beneath all that beauty, however, lurks a manipulative extremist who, while [[KnightTemplar believing himself righteous]], is capable of exceptional violence and cruelty.

to:

* FaceOfAnAngelMindOfADemon: Every description of Grindelwald as a young man credits him as very handsome, and in the first two films, he's portrayed by Johnny Depp, whose handsome features are not greatly marred by Grindelwald's colourless appearance. Once Mikkelsen took over the role, he became more conventionally attractive. If nothing else, Grindelwald's good looks were a big part of what won him the heart of a young Albus Dumbledore. Beneath all that beauty, however, lurks a manipulative extremist who, while [[KnightTemplar believing himself righteous]], is capable of exceptional violence and cruelty. This stands in sharp contrast to Voldemort who was [[IWasQuiteALooker strikingly handsome as a young man]] but was morphed into a [[EvilMakesYouUgly hairless, inhuman being closer to a snake than a man by his dark magic]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, [[EvilIsSexy being a villain]], having NoSenseOfPersonalSpace, and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.

to:

* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, [[EvilIsSexy being a villain]], having NoSenseOfPersonalSpace, and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, having NoSenseOfPersonalSpace, and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.

to:

* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, [[EvilIsSexy being a villain]], having NoSenseOfPersonalSpace, and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, having [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace no sense of personal space]], and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.

to:

* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, having [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace no sense of personal space]], NoSenseOfPersonalSpace, and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, having [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace]], and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.

to:

* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, having [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace]], [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace no sense of personal space]], and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, having [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace no sense of personal space]], and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.

to:

* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic, having [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace no sense of personal space]], [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace]], and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.

to:

* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic charismatic, having [[NoSenseOfPersonalSpace no sense of personal space]], and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in ''Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone'' that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in ''Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone'' that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds [[spoiler:proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in "Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone" that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in "Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone" ''Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone'' that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in "Literature/HarryPotterandThePhilosophersStone" that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in "Literature/HarryPotterandThePhilosophersStone" "Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone" that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in [[Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone book]] that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in [[Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone book]] "Literature/HarryPotterandThePhilosophersStone" that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in [[Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosopher'sStone book]] that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in [[Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosopher'sStone [[Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosophersStone book]] that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in "Literature/HarryPotterandthePhilosopher'sStone book" that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in "Literature/HarryPotterandthePhilosopher'sStone book" [[Literature/HarryPotterAndThePhilosopher'sStone book]] that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in "Literature/HarryPotterandthePhilosopher'sStone" that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in "Literature/HarryPotterandthePhilosopher'sStone" "Literature/HarryPotterandthePhilosopher'sStone book" that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in Sorcerer's Stone that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a callback to Dumbledore's statement in Sorcerer's Stone "Literature/HarryPotterandthePhilosopher'sStone" that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

Added: 205

Changed: 38

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AllGaysArePromiscuous: Subverted. Despite being extremely attractive and charismatic and having hordes of followers who would likely do anything for him, he never shows interest in anyone but Dumbledore.



* AmbiguouslyEvil: While he's definitely gone off the deep end and committed horrible atrocities, whether or not he is a WellIntentionedExtremist who genuinely believes that subjugating Muggles is justified because they're forcing wizards into hiding and then takes that belief too far or if that belief is just a front for gaining power for power's sake is ultimately left open to interpretation. If he truly came to regret what he'd done as an old man or if he was just miserable after being locked in a prison for half a century is also left open to interpretation.

to:

* AmbiguouslyEvil: While he's definitely gone off the deep end and committed horrible atrocities, whether or not he is a WellIntentionedExtremist who genuinely believes that subjugating Muggles is justified because they're forcing wizards into hiding and then takes that belief too far or if that belief is just a front for gaining power for power's sake is ultimately left open to interpretation. If he truly came to regret what he'd done as an old man or if he was just miserable after being locked in a prison for half a century is also left open to interpretation.interpretation, though the former is heavily implied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a call-back to Dumbledore's statement in Sorcerer's Stone that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a call-back callback to Dumbledore's statement in Sorcerer's Stone that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part.

to:

* MeaningfulEcho: His face-off with Voldemort, right down to him noting "I welcome death", echoes the "The Tale of the Three Brothers" story, which, considering Grindelwald's interest in the hallows and Voldemort's interest in the wand being based on the same thing, was likely an invoked trope on his part. His line to Voldemort in the same scene, "there is so much you do not understand," is almost certainly a call-back to Dumbledore's statement in Sorcerer's Stone that "if there is one thing Voldemort cannot understand, it is love," given that Grindelwald then proceeds to die trying to protect his lover's tomb from being desecrated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NoSenseOfPersonalSpace: He tends to stand really close to someone he threatens or sways, as he did to Credence, Krall, and [[spoiler:Queenie]]. He also pulls Spielman awfully close and does a little turn with him before throwing him out of the carriage during his prison break.

to:

* NoSenseOfPersonalSpace: He tends to stand really close to someone he threatens or sways, as he did to Credence, Krall, and [[spoiler:Queenie]]. He also pulls Spielman awfully close and does a little turn with him before throwing him out of the flying carriage during his prison break.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NoSenseOfPersonalSpace: He tends to stand really close to someone he threatens or sways, as he did to Credence, Krall, and [[spoiler:Queenie]].

to:

* NoSenseOfPersonalSpace: He tends to stand really close to someone he threatens or sways, as he did to Credence, Krall, and [[spoiler:Queenie]]. He also pulls Spielman awfully close and does a little turn with him before throwing him out of the carriage during his prison break.

Added: 111

Removed: 111

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhiteMansBurden: His plan to conquer {{Muggles}} justifies itself by claiming to be for their "greater good."



* WhiteMansBurden: His plan to conquer {{Muggles}} justifies itself by claiming to be for their "greater good."

Added: 188

Removed: 188

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CulturedBadass: He looks completely at home in the upscale cafe where he meets with Dumbledore, and comments on his appreciation of a good cup of tea. He also wears a tux extremely well.


Added DiffLines:

* WickedCultured: He looks completely at home in the upscale cafe where he meets with Dumbledore, and comments on his appreciation of a good cup of tea. He also wears a tux extremely well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CulturedBadass: He looks completely at home in the upscale cafe where he meets with Dumbledore, and comments on his appreciation of a good cup of tea. He also wears a tux extremely well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
If Gellert killed Ariana, it was unintentional and thus not an example of "Would Hit a Girl."


* WouldHitAGirl: Grindelwald makes it clear that he has no qualms treating woman just like he treats his male opponents. He callously flung a car at Tina to prevent her from hindering him and he takes down groups of aurors that included female ones while making it clear that he would have also killed Picquery had he not been restrained by Newt at the last moment. During the second film, he has a mother of a family killed like her husband and infant child, kills female aurors as mercilessly as he did with the male ones, tries openly to burn Tina to death, and when Leta saved them, he coldly kills her as well. Not to mention the fact that he may or may not have been the one that killed Ariana.

to:

* WouldHitAGirl: Grindelwald makes it clear that he has no qualms treating woman just like he treats his male opponents. He callously flung a car at Tina to prevent her from hindering him and he takes down groups of aurors that included female ones while making it clear that he would have also killed Picquery had he not been restrained by Newt at the last moment. During the second film, he has a mother of a family killed like her husband and infant child, kills female aurors as mercilessly as he did with the male ones, tries openly to burn Tina to death, and when Leta saved them, he coldly kills her as well. Not to mention the fact that he may or may not have been the one that killed Ariana.

Added: 276

Changed: 63

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SuicideByCop: He essentially commits suicide by letting Voldemort kill him.

to:

* SuicideByCop: He SuicideByCop:
**He
essentially commits suicide by letting Voldemort kill him.
**Subverted. [[spoiler: After Dumbledore breaks up with him he stands on a ledge overhanging a cliff while the good guys shoot spells at
him. He jumps and apparates away right when the spells would have hit him.]]

Added: 1694

Changed: 23

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VillainWithGoodPublicity: Played with; to the wizarding world at large, Grindelwald is an infamous criminal, but to his sympathisers and followers, he's a righteous revolutionary fighting to free Wizardkind from oppressive and unjust laws. During his rally at the climax of ''The Crimes of Grindelwald'', he presents himself as a noble and sympathetic figure fighting against bloodthirsty Aurors to save Muggles from themselves, presenting compelling arguments in his favour that succeed in swaying the hearts and minds of many, [[spoiler:including Queenie and Credence]]. Keeping up this appearance is crucial to Grindelwald's success; he waits until his sympathisers and new recruits have left before he starts slaughtering Aurors and abandoning Paris to what he believes will be its destruction. However, his true colors are exposed at the end of the third film.

to:

* VillainWithGoodPublicity: Played with; to the wizarding world at large, Grindelwald is an infamous criminal, but to his sympathisers and followers, he's a righteous revolutionary fighting to free Wizardkind from oppressive and unjust laws. During his rally at the climax of ''The Crimes of Grindelwald'', he presents himself as a noble and sympathetic figure fighting against bloodthirsty Aurors to save Muggles from themselves, presenting compelling arguments in his favour that succeed in swaying the hearts and minds of many, [[spoiler:including Queenie and Credence]]. Keeping up this appearance is crucial to Grindelwald's success; he waits until his sympathisers and new recruits have left before he starts slaughtering Aurors and abandoning Paris to what he believes will be its destruction. However, his true colors are exposed to the wizarding world at the end of the third film.film.
** To elaborate, Grindelwald's grim effectiveness with this trope compared to the rather ineffectual methods of Voldemort's brute-force ways are fully demonstrated in the third film and also demonstrates the complete difference between them that makes Grindelwald a far more terrifying villain. While Voldemort wanted to dominate Britain through sheer force, Grindelwald only makes the terrorist attacks look like he's fighting the unjust powers of the world and actively seeks to be diplomatic. Not to mention he is no pure-blood supremacist and accepts anyone while Voldemort was selective at best and completely bigoted at worst. And while Voldemort and Grindelwald are both arrogant, Grindelwald is much better at appearing humble and simply seeking a revolution because unlike Voldemort, he is not a psychopath as much as he is detached towards his enemies and willing to do whatever it takes to crush them and regularly portrays himself as a valiant revolutionary with immense power, which Voldemort can never be because he was a DirtyCoward. All this combined means that Grindelwald is significantly better at attracting subordinates and devotees everywhere, and as he is attacking the whole world and not just Britain, there was simply too many people who support him and too little evidence to charge him with. In the end, even though the magical governments are all desperately trying to paint him as a criminal, they ultimately have to bow down as he has won the public and charging him any further would lead to violence. It takes Dumbledore, an equally brilliant individual who has none of Grindelwald's arrogance, in order to expose him and truly encourage resistance against him.

Top