Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Awesome / MyCousinVinny

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Vinny:''' So you knew that. Uh, do you remember what ya had?
-->'''Tipton''': Eggs and grits.
-->'''Vinny''': Eggs and grits. I like grits too. How do you cook your grits? You like 'em regular, creamy or al dente?
-->'''Tipton''': Just regular, I guess.
-->'''Vinny''': Regular. Instant grits?
-->'''Tipton''': ''[chuckles]'' No self-respectin’ Southerner uses instant grits. I take pride in my grits.
-->'''Vinny''': ''[Walks over to Jury, as he prepares his [[ArmorPiercingQuestion next question]]]'' So, Mr. Tipton. [[ArmorPiercingQuestion How could it take you]] ''[[ArmorPiercingQuestion five]]'' [[ArmorPiercingQuestion minutes to cook your grits, when it takes the entire grit-eating world]] ''[[ArmorPiercingQuestion twenty]]'' [[ArmorPiercingQuestion minutes?]]
-->''[Tipton falls silent for a moment. Lisa smiles excitedly, and the entire courtroom stares at Tipton apprehensively, realizing Vinny has him stumped]''
-->'''Tipton:''' ''[nervously]'' I dunno. I'm a fast cook, I guess.
-->'''Vinny''': I'm sorry, I was all the way over here. I couldn't hear you. Did you just say you're a fast cook? That's it!? Are we to believe that boiling water soaks into a grit... faster in your kitchen... than on any place on the face of the Earth?
-->'''Tipton''': ''[faltering]'' I don't know.
-->'''Vinny''': Well, perhaps the laws of physics cease to exist on your stove! Were these ''magic'' grits? I mean, did you buy them from the same guy who sold Jack his beanstalk beans!?
-->'''Jim Trotter''': Objection, Your Honor.
-->'''Judge Haller''': Objection sustained. You can ignore the question, Mr. Tipton.
-->'''Vinny''': ''[advancing on Tipton]'' You sure about that five minutes?
-->'''Tipton''': I don't know.
-->'''Vinny''': Are you sure about that five minutes?
-->'''Tipton:''' I don't '''know'''!
-->'''Judge Haller:''' ''[banging his gavel repeatedly]'' I think you made your point.
-->'''Vinny:''' '''ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT FIVE MINUTES?'''
-->'''Tipton:''' ''[embarrassed]'' I may have been mistaken.
-->'''Vinny:''' I got no more use for this guy.
-->''[Haller looks shocked by the exchange, while Lisa gives Vinny a proud look, and someone in the public gallery applauds. Stan turns to his public defender]''
-->'''Stan:''' You're fired. ''[gets up and points at Vinny]'' I want him!
** Really, the whole setup and payoff is an extended CMOA. Earlier in the film, we saw Vinny interview each of the 3 eyewitnesses who claimed to identity the defendants leaving the store after the clerk was murdered. Each time, we only hear one question. Each time, it's a [[CaptainObvious stupid-sounding]], [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}}seemingly irrelevant]] question. ("What did you have for breakfast?" "What's that stuff on your window?" "When did you last have those glasses prescribed?") When it comes time for their day in court, Vinny starts off each cross examination with [[ChekhovsGun the same "stupid" question]] we saw him ask earlier...and each time it leads to a brilliant demolishing of the credibility of each eyewitness.

to:

'''Vinny:''' So you knew that. Uh, do you remember what ya had?
-->'''Tipton''': Eggs and grits.
-->'''Vinny''':
had?\\
'''Tipton:'''
Eggs and grits.\\
'''Vinny:''' Eggs and grits.
I like grits too. How do you cook your grits? You like 'em regular, creamy or al dente?
-->'''Tipton''':
dente?\\
'''Tipton:'''
Just regular, I guess.
-->'''Vinny''':
guess.\\
'''Vinny:'''
Regular. Instant grits?
-->'''Tipton''':
grits?\\
'''Tipton:'''
''[chuckles]'' No self-respectin’ self-respectin' Southerner uses instant grits. I take pride in my grits. \n-->'''Vinny''': \\
'''Vinny:'''
''[Walks over to Jury, as he prepares his [[ArmorPiercingQuestion next question]]]'' So, Mr. Tipton. [[ArmorPiercingQuestion How could it take you]] ''[[ArmorPiercingQuestion five]]'' [[ArmorPiercingQuestion minutes to cook your grits, when it takes the entire grit-eating world]] ''[[ArmorPiercingQuestion twenty]]'' [[ArmorPiercingQuestion minutes?]]
-->''[Tipton
minutes?]]\\
''[Tipton
falls silent for a moment. Lisa smiles excitedly, and the entire courtroom stares at Tipton apprehensively, realizing Vinny has him stumped]''
-->'''Tipton:'''
stumped]''\\
'''Tipton:'''
''[nervously]'' I dunno. I'm a fast cook, I guess.
-->'''Vinny''':
guess.\\
'''Vinny:'''
I'm sorry, I was all the way over here. I couldn't hear you. Did you just say you're a fast cook? That's it!? Are we to believe that boiling water soaks into a grit... faster in your kitchen... than on any place on the face of the Earth?
-->'''Tipton''':
Earth?\\
'''Tipton:'''
''[faltering]'' I don't know.
-->'''Vinny''':
know.\\
'''Vinny:'''
Well, perhaps the laws of physics cease to exist on your stove! Were these ''magic'' grits? I mean, did you buy them from the same guy who sold Jack his beanstalk beans!?
-->'''Jim Trotter''':
beans!?\\
'''Jim Trotter:'''
Objection, Your Honor.
-->'''Judge Haller''':
Honor.\\
'''Judge Haller:'''
Objection sustained. You can ignore the question, Mr. Tipton.
-->'''Vinny''':
Tipton.\\
'''Vinny:'''
''[advancing on Tipton]'' You sure about that five minutes?
-->'''Tipton''':
minutes?\\
'''Tipton:'''
I don't know.
-->'''Vinny''':
know.\\
'''Vinny:'''
Are you sure about that five minutes?
-->'''Tipton:'''
minutes?\\
'''Tipton:'''
I don't '''know'''!
-->'''Judge
'''know'''!\\
'''Judge
Haller:''' ''[banging his gavel repeatedly]'' I think you made your point.
-->'''Vinny:'''
point.\\
'''Vinny:'''
'''ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT FIVE MINUTES?'''
-->'''Tipton:'''
MINUTES?'''\\
'''Tipton:'''
''[embarrassed]'' I may have been mistaken.
-->'''Vinny:'''
mistaken.\\
'''Vinny:'''
I got no more use for this guy.
-->''[Haller
guy.\\
''[Haller
looks shocked by the exchange, while Lisa gives Vinny a proud look, and someone in the public gallery applauds. Stan turns to his public defender]''
-->'''Stan:'''
defender]''\\
'''Stan:'''
You're fired. ''[gets up and points at Vinny]'' I want him!
** Really, the whole setup and payoff is an extended CMOA. Earlier in the film, we saw Vinny interview each of the 3 eyewitnesses who claimed to identity the defendants leaving the store after the clerk was murdered. Each time, we only hear one question. Each time, it's a [[CaptainObvious stupid-sounding]], [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}}seemingly [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}} seemingly irrelevant]] question. ("What did you have for breakfast?" "What's that stuff on your window?" "When did you last have those glasses prescribed?") When it comes time for their day in court, Vinny starts off each cross examination with [[ChekhovsGun the same "stupid" question]] we saw him ask earlier...and each time it leads to a brilliant demolishing of the credibility of each eyewitness.



--->'''Vinny:''' Does the Defense's case hold water?\\

to:

--->'''Vinny:''' ---->'''Vinny:''' Does the Defense's case hold water?\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Art/TheMonaLisa besting and kicking the ass of an ''FBI vehicles expert'', and Vinny winning the case against an experienced attorney.

to:

** Art/TheMonaLisa Lisa besting and kicking the ass of an ''FBI vehicles expert'', and Vinny winning the case against an experienced attorney.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Mona Lisa besting and kicking the ass of an ''FBI vehicles expert'', and Vinny winning the case against an experienced attorney.
* Also something that's rare in movie trials - even without the tire tracks, Vinny ''had won''. He put so many holes in the prosecution's case, it looked like Swiss cheese. The only reason he's feeling the pressure is because the judge is about to figure out he's lying about his credentials and he needs to get out immediately. Vinny didn't need a SmokingGun, and he found one anyway. That's awesome.

to:

** Mona Lisa Art/TheMonaLisa besting and kicking the ass of an ''FBI vehicles expert'', and Vinny winning the case against an experienced attorney.
* Also something that's rare in movie trials - -- even without the tire tracks, Vinny ''had won''. He put so many holes in the prosecution's case, it looked like Swiss cheese. The only reason he's feeling the pressure is because the judge is about to figure out he's lying about his credentials and he needs to get out immediately. Vinny didn't need a SmokingGun, and he found one anyway. That's awesome.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Vinny''': Is it possible the two defendants entered the store, picked 22 specific items off of the shelves, had the clerk take money, make change, then leave... Then ''two different men'' drive up in a similar - ''[sees Tipton is already shaking his head]'' Don't shake your head. I'm not done yet. Wait till you hear the whole thing so you can understand this now... ''[continues]'' Two ''different men'' drive up in a similar looking car, go in, shoot the clerk, '''rob him''', and then leave?
-->'''Tipton''': No. They didn't have enough time.
-->'''Vinny''': Well, how much time was they in the store?
-->'''Tipton''': Five minutes.
-->'''Vinny''': Five minutes? Are you sure? Did you look at your watch?
-->'''Tipton''': No.
-->'''Vinny''': Oh, oh, oh, I'm sorry. You testified earlier that the boys went into the store, and you had just begun to make breakfast. You were just ready to eat, and you heard a gunshot. That's right. I'm sorry. So obviously, it takes you five minutes to make breakfast.
-->'''Tipton''': That's right.
-->'''Vinny''': So you knew that. Uh, do you remember what ya had?

to:

-->'''Vinny''': -->'''Vinny:''' Is it possible the two defendants entered the store, picked 22 specific items off of the shelves, had the clerk take money, make change, then leave... Then ''two different men'' drive up in a similar - ''[sees Tipton is already shaking his head]'' Don't shake your head. I'm not done yet. Wait till you hear the whole thing so you can understand this now... ''[continues]'' Two ''different men'' drive up in a similar looking car, go in, shoot the clerk, '''rob him''', and then leave?
-->'''Tipton''':
leave?\\
'''Tipton:'''
No. They didn't have enough time.
-->'''Vinny''':
time.\\
'''Vinny:'''
Well, how much time was they in the store?
-->'''Tipton''':
store?\\
'''Tipton:'''
Five minutes.
-->'''Vinny''':
minutes.\\
'''Vinny:'''
Five minutes? Are you sure? Did you look at your watch?
-->'''Tipton''': No.
-->'''Vinny''':
watch?\\
'''Tipton:''' No.\\
'''Vinny:'''
Oh, oh, oh, I'm sorry. You testified earlier that the boys went into the store, and you had just begun to make breakfast. You were just ready to eat, and you heard a gunshot. That's right. I'm sorry. So obviously, it takes you five minutes to make breakfast.
-->'''Tipton''':
breakfast.\\
'''Tipton:'''
That's right.
-->'''Vinny''':
right.\\
'''Vinny:'''
So you knew that. Uh, do you remember what ya had?



-->'''Tipton''': ''[nervously]'' I dunno. I'm a fast cook, I guess.

to:

-->'''Tipton''': -->'''Tipton:''' ''[nervously]'' I dunno. I'm a fast cook, I guess.



-->'''Tipton''': I don't '''know'''!
-->'''Judge Haller''': ''[banging his gavel repeatedly]'' I think you made your point.
-->'''Vinny''': '''ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT FIVE MINUTES?'''
-->'''Tipton''': ''[embarrassed]'' I may have been mistaken.
-->'''Vinny''': I got no more use for this guy.

to:

-->'''Tipton''': -->'''Tipton:''' I don't '''know'''!
-->'''Judge Haller''': Haller:''' ''[banging his gavel repeatedly]'' I think you made your point.
-->'''Vinny''': -->'''Vinny:''' '''ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT FIVE MINUTES?'''
-->'''Tipton''': -->'''Tipton:''' ''[embarrassed]'' I may have been mistaken.
-->'''Vinny''': -->'''Vinny:''' I got no more use for this guy.



-->'''Stan''': You're fired. ''[gets up and points at Vinny]'' I want him!

to:

-->'''Stan''': -->'''Stan:''' You're fired. ''[gets up and points at Vinny]'' I want him!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Vinny''': I'm sorry, I was all the way over here. I couldn't hear you. Did you just say you're a fast cook? That's it!? Are we to believe that boiling water soaks into a grit... faster in your kitchen... than on any place on the face of the Earth!?

to:

-->'''Vinny''': I'm sorry, I was all the way over here. I couldn't hear you. Did you just say you're a fast cook? That's it!? Are we to believe that boiling water soaks into a grit... faster in your kitchen... than on any place on the face of the Earth!?Earth?



-->'''Vinny''': '''ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT FIVE MINUTES!?!?'''

to:

-->'''Vinny''': '''ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT FIVE MINUTES!?!?'''MINUTES?'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Also something that's rare in movie trials - even without the tire tracks, Vinny ''had won''. He put so many holes in the prosecution's case, it looked like Swiss cheese. The only reason he's feeling the pressure is because the judge is about to figure out he's lying about his credentials and he needs to get out immediately. Vinny didn't need a SmokingGun, and he found one anyway. That's awesome.

Removed: 1064

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No meta moment, see this query.


----
!! Meta
* Creator/MarisaTomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won (Kevin Kline for ''Film/AFishCalledWanda'', Alan Arkin for ''Film/LittleMissSunshine''), she was the film's sole nomination.
** Also a bit VindicatedByHistory or HilariousInHindsight, but for years there was talk that Tomei accidentally won because presenter Jack Palance misread the card. The Academy kept insisting that they would have interrupted if the wrong name was read to make sure the actual winner received the Oscar. Flash forward to the 2017 ceremony, when there ''was'' a screw-up with the cards for Best Picture, and they had to interrupt the people for ''Film/LaLaLand'' to let everyone know the real winner was ''{{Film/Moonlight|2016}}''.
* In some law schools, this is the go-to movie for educating law students in how to be lawyers. Heck, this is "So You Want To Be A Lawyer: TheMovie".

Changed: 559

Removed: 520

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** So did Vinny. Remember that he was the one who asked Sheriff Farley to look into the Tempest.
** Keep in mind that the reason why the sheriff could reveal the arrest of the killers was because Vinny tipped him off right after realizing the significance of the picture. After that is when he gets Lisa, who's still mad at him for rejecting her help, to cooperate by letting her realize the significance of the picture and inevitably show off her impressive knowledge regarding general automotive topics. He's also clever enough to let her assuage her pride by setting it up so she can say he is wrong in open court.

to:

*** So did Vinny. Remember that he was the one who asked Sheriff Farley to look into the Tempest.
**
Tempest. Keep in mind that the reason why the sheriff could reveal the arrest of the killers was because Vinny had tipped him off right after realizing the significance of the picture. After that is when he gets Lisa, who's still mad at him for rejecting her help, to cooperate by letting her realize the significance of the picture and inevitably on her own, show off her impressive knowledge regarding general automotive topics. He's also clever enough to let her assuage her pride by topics, and setting it her up so she can say he is to be able to tell him he's wrong in open court.court - he resolves the case ''and'' their own recent arguments as a couple, all in one scene.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Marisa Tomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won (Kevin Kline for ''Film/AFishCalledWanda'', Alan Arkin for ''Film/LittleMissSunshine''), she was the film's sole nomination.

to:

* Marisa Tomei Creator/MarisaTomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won (Kevin Kline for ''Film/AFishCalledWanda'', Alan Arkin for ''Film/LittleMissSunshine''), she was the film's sole nomination.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also a bit VindicatedByHistory or HilariousInHindsight, but for years there had been talk that Tomei accidentally won because presenter Jack Palance misread the card. The Academy kept insisting that they would have interrupted if the wrong name was read to make sure the actual winner received the Oscar. Flash forward to the 2017 ceremony, when there ''was'' a screw-up with the cards for Best Picture, and they had to interrupt the people for ''Film/LaLaLand'' to let everyone know the real winner was ''Film/Moonlight2016''.

to:

** Also a bit VindicatedByHistory or HilariousInHindsight, but for years there had been was talk that Tomei accidentally won because presenter Jack Palance misread the card. The Academy kept insisting that they would have interrupted if the wrong name was read to make sure the actual winner received the Oscar. Flash forward to the 2017 ceremony, when there ''was'' a screw-up with the cards for Best Picture, and they had to interrupt the people for ''Film/LaLaLand'' to let everyone know the real winner was ''Film/Moonlight2016''.''{{Film/Moonlight|2016}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In some law schools, this is the go-to movie for educating law students in how to be lawyers. Heck, this is "So you want to be a Lawyer: the Movie".

to:

* In some law schools, this is the go-to movie for educating law students in how to be lawyers. Heck, this is "So you want to be a You Want To Be A Lawyer: the Movie".TheMovie".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Marisa Tomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won ([[Film/AFishCalledWanda Kevin Kline]],[[Film/LittleMissSunshine Alan Arkin]]), she was the film's sole nomination.
** Also a bit VindicatedByHistory or HilariousInHindsight, but for years there had been talk that Tomei accidentally won because presenter Jack Palance misread the card. The Academy kept insisting that they would have interrupted if the wrong name was read to make sure the actual winner received the Oscar. Flash forward to the 2017 ceremonies, when there ''was'' a screw-up with the cards for Best Picture, and they had to interrupt the people for ''Film/LaLaLand'' to let everyone know the real winner was ''Film/Moonlight2016''.

to:

* Marisa Tomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won ([[Film/AFishCalledWanda Kevin Kline]],[[Film/LittleMissSunshine (Kevin Kline for ''Film/AFishCalledWanda'', Alan Arkin]]), Arkin for ''Film/LittleMissSunshine''), she was the film's sole nomination.
** Also a bit VindicatedByHistory or HilariousInHindsight, but for years there had been talk that Tomei accidentally won because presenter Jack Palance misread the card. The Academy kept insisting that they would have interrupted if the wrong name was read to make sure the actual winner received the Oscar. Flash forward to the 2017 ceremonies, ceremony, when there ''was'' a screw-up with the cards for Best Picture, and they had to interrupt the people for ''Film/LaLaLand'' to let everyone know the real winner was ''Film/Moonlight2016''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Marisa Tomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won (Kevin Kline for [[Film/AFishCalledWanda]], Alan Arkin for [[Film/LittleMissSunshine]]), she was the film's sole nomination.

to:

* Marisa Tomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won (Kevin Kline for [[Film/AFishCalledWanda]], ([[Film/AFishCalledWanda Kevin Kline]],[[Film/LittleMissSunshine Alan Arkin for [[Film/LittleMissSunshine]]), Arkin]]), she was the film's sole nomination.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Marisa Tomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won ([[Film/AFishCalledWanda Kevin Kline]], [[Film/LittleMissSunshine Alan Arkin]]), she was the film's sole nomination.

to:

* Marisa Tomei winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress, given how rare a feat is it for an actor to do such a thing for a purely comedic performance. Even more impressive given how, unlike some other comedic performances that have won ([[Film/AFishCalledWanda Kevin Kline]], [[Film/LittleMissSunshine (Kevin Kline for [[Film/AFishCalledWanda]], Alan Arkin]]), Arkin for [[Film/LittleMissSunshine]]), she was the film's sole nomination.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Vinny''': ''[Walks over to Jury, as he prepares his [[ArmorPiercingQuestion next question]]]'' So, Mr. Tipton. How could it take you ''five'' minutes to cook your grits, when it takes the entire grit-eating world ''twenty'' minutes?

to:

-->'''Vinny''': ''[Walks over to Jury, as he prepares his [[ArmorPiercingQuestion next question]]]'' So, Mr. Tipton. [[ArmorPiercingQuestion How could it take you ''five'' you]] ''[[ArmorPiercingQuestion five]]'' [[ArmorPiercingQuestion minutes to cook your grits, when it takes the entire grit-eating world ''twenty'' minutes?world]] ''[[ArmorPiercingQuestion twenty]]'' [[ArmorPiercingQuestion minutes?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The glasses witness deserves a slot here for how it was still in court. Vinny goes to the far end of the court and holds up two fingers, asking the witness, how many fingers he's holding up. The judge hastily states that the attorney is holding up two fingers, which has to be documented and potentially harms the defense. So, what does Vinny do to keep it legal? He simply holds up two fingers again, keeping the process up and legal. The witness still gets it wrong and it effectively shoots her claim and testimony in the foot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Vinny:''' Does the Defense's case hold water?\\

to:

-->'''Vinny:''' --->'''Vinny:''' Does the Defense's case hold water?\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Vinny''': ''[Walks over to Jury, as he prepares his next question]'' So, Mr. Tipton. How could it take you ''five'' minutes to cook your grits, when it takes the entire grit-eating world ''twenty'' minutes?

to:

-->'''Vinny''': ''[Walks over to Jury, as he prepares his [[ArmorPiercingQuestion next question]'' question]]]'' So, Mr. Tipton. How could it take you ''five'' minutes to cook your grits, when it takes the entire grit-eating world ''twenty'' minutes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** This isn't even just Vinny being clever: [[https://youtu.be/a1I7QBCHqng as one lawyer observed]], the point of Vinny's examination of Lisa is that he's not doing a ''cross''-examination but a ''direct'' examination. In cross-examination, the lawyer is the star because the whole idea is to cast doubt on the credibility of a witness. But in direct examination, the witness is the star because the whole idea is to have them show off how much they understand and can explain about the case. Lisa is the one person who is in a position to explain how the tire tracks show that the killers couldn't have been driving Bill and Stan's car, and Vinny is happy to let her to do so, not just because in doing so, she defeats the prosecution's case but because it makes her stop being pissed off with him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Chekov's Gun


** Really, the whole setup and payoff is an extended CMOA. Earlier in the film, we saw Vinny interview each of the 3 eyewitnesses who claimed to identity the defendants leaving the store after the clerk was murdered. Each time, we only hear one question. Each time, it's a [[CaptainObvious stupid-sounding]], [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}}seemingly irrelevant]] question. ("What did you have for breakfast?" "What's that stuff on your window?" "When did you last have those glasses prescribed?") When it comes time for their day in court, Vinny starts off each cross examination with [[ChekovsGun the same "stupid" question]] we saw him ask earlier...and each time it leads to a brilliant demolishing of the credibility of each eyewitness.

to:

** Really, the whole setup and payoff is an extended CMOA. Earlier in the film, we saw Vinny interview each of the 3 eyewitnesses who claimed to identity the defendants leaving the store after the clerk was murdered. Each time, we only hear one question. Each time, it's a [[CaptainObvious stupid-sounding]], [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}}seemingly irrelevant]] question. ("What did you have for breakfast?" "What's that stuff on your window?" "When did you last have those glasses prescribed?") When it comes time for their day in court, Vinny starts off each cross examination with [[ChekovsGun [[ChekhovsGun the same "stupid" question]] we saw him ask earlier...and each time it leads to a brilliant demolishing of the credibility of each eyewitness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In some law schools, this is the go-to movie for educating law students in how to be lawyers. Heck, this is "So you want to be a Lawyer: the Movie".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Really, the whole setup and payoff is an extended CMOA. Earlier in the film, we saw Vinny interview each of the 3 eyewitnesses who claimed to identity the defendants leaving the store after the clerk was murdered. Each time, we only hear one question. Each time, it's a stupid sounding, seemingly irrelevant question. ("What did you have for breakfast?" "What's that stuff on your window?" "When did you last have those glasses prescribed?") When it comes time for their day in court, Vinny starts off each cross examination with the same "stupid" question we saw him ask earlier...and each time it leads to a brilliant demolishing of the credibility of each eyewitness.

to:

** Really, the whole setup and payoff is an extended CMOA. Earlier in the film, we saw Vinny interview each of the 3 eyewitnesses who claimed to identity the defendants leaving the store after the clerk was murdered. Each time, we only hear one question. Each time, it's a stupid sounding, seemingly irrelevant [[CaptainObvious stupid-sounding]], [[{{Cloudcuckoolander}}seemingly irrelevant]] question. ("What did you have for breakfast?" "What's that stuff on your window?" "When did you last have those glasses prescribed?") When it comes time for their day in court, Vinny starts off each cross examination with [[ChekovsGun the same "stupid" question question]] we saw him ask earlier...and each time it leads to a brilliant demolishing of the credibility of each eyewitness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Which is one of the ways this movie accurately depicts how lawyers are supposed to act: '''Never ask a question for which you don't already know the answer.''' Look what happened to the Public Defender when he asked why the one witness wasn't wearing his "necessary prescription glasses." "They're reading glasses."

to:

*** Which is one of the ways this movie accurately depicts how lawyers are supposed to act: '''Never ask a question for which you don't already know the answer.''' Look what happened to the Public Defender when he asked why the one witness wasn't wearing his "necessary prescription glasses." eyglasses": "They're reading glasses."

Top