History Awesome / BrowsHeldHigh

** The sheer volume of cameos in the opening number is astounding (though it helps that it was filmed at a convention). Aside from Jerk, there's WebVideo/PushingUpRoses, WebVideo/BennettTheSage, WebVideo/ToddInTheShadows, WebVideo/TheLastAngryGeek, WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic, [[WebVideo/AtopTheFourthWall Linkara]], WebVideo/TheRapCritic, [[WebVideo/BadMovieBeatdown Film Brain]], [[WebVideo/WhatTheFuckIsWrongWithYou Nash]], [[Creator/AllisonPregler Obscurus Lupa]], WebVideo/{{Phelous}}, Mikey Insanity, RL King, WebVideo/DiamandaHagan, WebVideo/TheOmega, WebVideo/PawDugan, [[WebVideo/NeedsMoreGay Rantasmo]], WebVideo/ThatSciFiGuy, [[WebVideo/VampireReviews Maven of the Eventide]], [[WebVideo/TheQuestForGeekdom Arthur Knowledge]], [[WebVideo/CountJackula Masqued Slaher]], [[Website/{{Geekvision}} Horror Guru]], Creator/CriticalMarine, [[WebVideo/VigalovesComics Viga]], WebVideo/KittyMarie, WebVideo/TheHardcoreKid, WebVideo/ThePhilosofan, [[WebVideo/RBGProductions Spazz]], [[WebVideo/WhatWeHadToWatch Il Neige]], and [[WebVideo/TheIdiotsLantern The Wire]].

* To close out Shakespeare Month, Kyle, once more, covers ''Film/{{Anonymous}}'', and reduces it to ashes in piece-by-piece detail.

* The vlog on ''Film/{{Anonymous}}'', taking the movie to task for its multiple violations of the chronology of when Shakespeare's plays were released, and just common sense.

-->'''Fan:''' I just don't get why you hang out with [[Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses those losers]] all the time.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he savagely parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first quarter of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others. He then partially abandons the format of a [=CinemaSins=] video to further explore the very concept of critiquing a film during the second quarter, juxtaposing "sins" against legendary film critic Susan Sontag's thoughts on various films and how they can be interpreted. He spends the third quarter arguing that [=CinemaSins=] not only does not provide any interpretation, but by reducing the value of a film to the binary addition or removal of perceived "sins", it vastly reduces the qualitative experience to a quantifiable, entirely arbitrary, value. Finally, he breaks down why the [=CinemaSins=] format works during the final quarter, including how it exploits quirks in human psychology to destroy the very concept of a film critique.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he savagely parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first quarter of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others. He then partially abandons the format of a [=CinemaSins=] video to further explore the very concept of critiquing a film during the second quarter, juxtaposing "sins" against legendary film critic Susan Sontag's thoughts on various films and how they can be interpreted. He spends the third quarter arguing that [=CinemaSins=] not only does not provide any interpretation, but by reducing the value of a film to the binary addition or removal of perceived "sins", it vastly reduces the qualitative experience to a quantifiable, somewhat arbitrary, value. Finally, he breaks down why the [=CinemaSins=] format works during the final quarter, including how it exploits quirks in human psychology to destroy the very concept of a film critique.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he savagely parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first quarter of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others. He then partially abandons the format of a [=CinemaSins=] video to further explore the very concept of critiquing a film during the second quarter, juxtaposing "sins" against legendary film critic Susan Sontag's thoughts on various films and how they can be interpreted. He spends the third quarter arguing that [=CinemaSins=] does not interpret the film reviewed. Finally, he breaks down why the [=CinemaSins=] format works during the final quarter, including how it exploits quirks in human psychology to destroy the very concept of a film critique.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he savagely parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first third of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others. He then partially abandons the format of a [=CinemaSins=] video to further explore the very concept of critiquing a film during the middle third, while also arguing that [=CinemaSins=] does not interpret the film reviewed. Finally, he breaks down why the [=CinemaSins=] format works during the final third, including how it exploits quirks in human psychology to destroy the very concept of a film critique.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he savagely parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first third of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others, then partially abandons the format of a [=CinemaSins=] video to further explore the very concept of critiquing a film during the middle third, before finally breaking down why the [=CinemaSins=] format works during the final third, including how it exploits quirks in human psychology to destroy the very concept of a film critique.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he savagely parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first third of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others, uses the format of a [=CinemaSins=] video to explore the very concept of cinema through its history, philosophy, and the act of critiquing something, then breaks down why the [=CinemaSins=] format works and utilizes an understanding in human psychology, while destroying the concept of film critique, during the final third.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he savagely parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first third of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others, uses the format of a CinemaSins video to explore the very concept of cinema through its history, philosophy, and the act of critiquing something, then breaks down why the CinemaSins format works and utilizes an understanding in human psychology, while destroying the concept of film critique, during the final third.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he savagely parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first half of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others, then breaks down why the format works and utilizes an understanding in human psychology during the second half.

* In his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbLku-0lzJ8 Sins. Cinema.]] video, he parodies the popular movie review series WebVideo/CinemaSins for the first half of the video, using various movies he has covered throughout his own career and many others, then breaks down why the format works and utilizes an understanding in human psychology during the second half.

* Kyle goes into [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wga87CDRyog a nearly two-hour-long self-proclaimed "book report"]] of not just all issues of ComicBook/TheLeagueOfExtraordinaryGentlemen and its spinoffs, but cites every single reference shown in the series. [[CrisisCrossover Every]]. [[ReferenceOverdosed Single]]. [[MassivelyMultiplayerCrossover ONE]].

* Kyle goes into [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wga87CDRyog a nearly two-hour-long self-proclaimed "book report"]] of not just all issues of ComicBook/TheLeagueOfExtraordinaryGentlemen and its spinoffs, but cites every single reference shown in the series. [[CrisisCrossover Every]]. [[LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters Single]]. [[MassivelyMultiplayerCrossover ONE]].

--> '''Kyle''': Yes! Because I would like to know more!

* A somewhat meta example, but it was quite impressive when he managed to make an analytical and even pretty fair review of ''Film/ASerbianFilm'', despite said movie being infamous for its horrific, [[{{Squick}} disturbing]] content that [[WebVideo/{{Phelous}} previous]] [[WebVideo/TheCinemaSnob reviewers]] have understandably deemed, as Kyle himself put it, "unsavory". Granted, [[UnstoppableRage it doesn't last]], but still! (For comparison's sake, ''Film/ASerbianFilm'' reduced WebVideo/{{Phelous}} to UnstoppableRage, and Creator/BradJones' out-of-character review was one of bemused, horrified disgust, urging people not to see it at all.)
** One particular moment: describing and explaining the context for the "NEWBORN! PORN!" moment. He actually makes that scene sound ''necessary''.
** Another meta moment comes at the end with the NATO head, deconstructing Oancitizen's (and by extension the audience's) rage by pointing out that he lost his mind after watching a horror movie... that actually horrified him.
* [[http://www.formspring.me/Oancitizen/q/257949026421318849 This FormSpring Response]].
* In a meta sense, when he reviewed ''Film/{{Slacker}}'', he did it in the ''best way possible'': '''phoning it in'''.