Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ArtisticLicenseHistory / ThreeHundred

Go To

OR

Added: 271

Changed: 519

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Leaving aside the debate about whether Xerxes was a tyrant, the films' contrast between the "freedom-loving" Greece and the "proslavery" Persia is an unrealistic coup of BlackAndWhiteMorality. In reality, both countries supported and allowed for slavery in one form or another, just like every other nation in the world at the time, so the propagation of slavery per se was not among the Greeks' worries. Those who fought against the empire had the worry that they would be enslaved if they lost, but this again was common practice in Greece, Persia and just everywhere else. The undemocratic feudal nature of the Persian state, the high concentration of power in the monarch, and the description of his subjects as ''bandaka'' ("bonded") may have given the Greeks the impression that all Persian subjects were both nominally and substantially slaves of the king.[[note]]Thus ''bandaka'' was translated ''doulos'', "slave."[[/note]] The claims of some Greek writers that imperial troops were driven to battle by officers cracking whips probably only worsened the Greeks's already paranoid views on their empire.
* As listed in the Characters entry below, the Achaemenid Empire was very religiously tolerant and none of its kings ever demanded to be worshipped as a god. This characterization of Xerxes is entirely inaccurate, as such a belief would be blasphemous in UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}}, his personal religion. Achaemenid kings were known to present themselves as gods in Egypt, where that was the correct thing to do, or as pious devotees of other peoples' gods, as in the Cyrus Cylinder of Babylon--essentially, whatever was best for PR--but among themselves the King and the ethnic Persians venerated Ahura Mazda and the other subjects whatever divinity they liked. This was another reason why Hebrews quite liked the Persian Empire, which liberated them from the clutches of the Babylonians in the process of conquering Babylon itself.
* Dilios and the Spartan soldiers show an utter disdain for the Ephors and the supernatural in general. However, by ancient Greek standards, Spartans were exceptionally religious and would have never dared to mock Hellenic priests or festivals, which is why they observed Carnea to a fault. Dilios's attitude towards religious traditions could have been believable in a Greek philosopher, but not a soldier, and much less a Spartan.
* The real Ephors weren't priests or any kind of oracular staff as portrayed in the film, but a council of secular Senators who ran the Spartan government. They were also citizens elected by popular assembly, not an endogamic caste as Dilios labels them. This is particularly odd since the Sparta from film also showcases a laic, more normal-looking citizen council which would have been a good portrayal of the Ephors from real life. The closest the Spartans had to the Ephors in the movie were the ''Pythians'', officials who had the duty of acting as emissaries to the Delphi Oracle... and these were appointed by the kings.

to:

* Leaving aside the debate about whether Xerxes was a tyrant, the films' contrast between the "freedom-loving" Greece and the "proslavery" Persia is an unrealistic coup of BlackAndWhiteMorality. In reality, both countries supported and allowed for slavery in one form or another, just like every other nation in the world at the time, so the propagation of slavery per se was not among the Greeks' worries. Those who fought against the empire had the worry that they would be enslaved if they lost, but this again was common practice in Greece, Persia and just everywhere else. The It was probably the undemocratic feudal nature of the Persian state, the high concentration of power in the monarch, and the description of his subjects as ''bandaka'' ("bonded") may have given which gave the Greeks the impression that all Persian subjects were both nominally and substantially slaves of the king.[[note]]Thus ''bandaka'' was translated ''doulos'', "slave."[[/note]] The claims of some Greek writers that imperial troops were driven to battle by officers cracking whips probably only worsened the Greeks's already paranoid views on their empire.
* As listed in the Characters entry below, the The Achaemenid Empire was very not any less religiously tolerant than any other nation at the time and none of its kings ever demanded to be worshipped as a god. This characterization of Xerxes is entirely inaccurate, as such a belief would be blasphemous in UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}}, his personal religion. Achaemenid kings were known to present themselves as gods in Egypt, where that was the correct thing to do, or as pious devotees of other peoples' gods, as in the Cyrus Cylinder of Babylon--essentially, whatever was best for PR--but among themselves the King and the ethnic Persians venerated Ahura Mazda and the other subjects whatever divinity divinity(es) they liked. This was another reason why Hebrews quite liked the Persian Empire, which liberated them from the clutches of the Babylonians in the process of conquering Babylon itself.
* Dilios and the Spartan soldiers show an utter disdain for the Ephors and the supernatural in general. However, by ancient Greek standards, Spartans were exceptionally religious and would have never dared to mock Hellenic priests or festivals, which is why they observed Carnea to a fault. Dilios's attitude towards religious traditions could have been believable in a Greek philosopher, philosopher,[[note]]by the point of the film is set, during the Pre-Socratic age of philosophy, almost every major philosopher had already left conventional theism behind[[/note]] but not a soldier, and much less a Spartan.
* The real Ephors weren't priests or any kind of oracular staff as portrayed in the film, but a council of secular Senators who ran the Spartan government. They were also citizens elected by popular assembly, not an endogamic caste as Dilios labels them. This is particularly odd since the Sparta from film also showcases a laic, secular, more normal-looking citizen council which would have been a good portrayal of the Ephors from real life. The closest the Spartans had to the Ephors in the movie were the ''Pythians'', officials who had the duty of acting as emissaries to the Delphi Oracle... and these were appointed by the kings.



* Spartan culture forbade citizens from working ''at all'' (including weaving and cooking), and all such work was done by slave labour. We never see any of those helots in the movie.

to:

* Spartan culture forbade citizens from working ''at all'' (including weaving and cooking), and all such work was done by slave labour. We never see any of those helots in the movie. We rather see them around camp fires with the implication they are doing it themselves.



* The films follow pop culture by portraying the Greek ships as smaller and more maneuverable than their Persian equivalents, which is exactly the opposite of the real situation: the Greeks ships were big, cumbersome and manned by less experienced sailors, so they typically put their trust more in their ship-borne hoplite marines to board and capture the enemy ships than in any inherent sailing advantage.

to:

* The films follow pop culture by portraying the Greek ships as smaller and more maneuverable than their Persian equivalents, which is exactly the opposite of the real situation: the Greeks ships were big, cumbersome and manned by less experienced sailors, so they typically put their trust more in their ship-borne hoplite marines to board and capture the enemy ships than in any inherent sailing advantage.



* Themistocles wasn't single as he says to Artemisia in the films; by the time of those events, he was already married and had ''ten'' children. She, also, was a widow and had at least a son.

to:

* Themistocles wasn't single as he says to tells Artemisia in the films; by the time of those events, he was already married and had several children, possibly as many as ''ten'' children.already. She, also, was a widow and had at least a son.



* Another important character from ''The 300 Spartans'' that gets AdaptedOut, again on the Greek side, is [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demophilus_of_Thespiae Demophilus]], the leader of a contingent of 700 Thespians (more than twice Leonidas' forces) who refused to retreat and died there along with the Spartans. This point is somewhat of a filmic deviation from the ''300'' graphic novel, though, as a small Thespian force do appear in it guarding the mountain pass before being butchered.

to:

* Another important character from ''The 300 Spartans'' that gets AdaptedOut, again on the Greek side, is [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demophilus_of_Thespiae Demophilus]], the leader of a contingent of 700 Thespians (more than twice Leonidas' forces) who refused to retreat and died there along with the Spartans. This point is somewhat of a filmic deviation from the ''300'' graphic novel, though, as a small Thespian force do appear appears in it guarding the mountain pass before being butchered.



* Darius didn't invade Athens because he was "annoyed by Greek freedom" or something, but because Athens and Eretria had supported the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionian_Revolt Ionian Revolt]] in territories of his empire that were formerly Greek colonies, like Aeolis, Cyprus and Caria. There is a grain of truth in the claim, though, as previously to the revolt, Darius' brother Artaphernes had told the Athenians to ditch democracy and reinstate their deposed tyrant Hippias (who was exiled in Darius's court) as a condition for Persian help against Sparta, and it was only after hearing this that Athens broke negotiations and instigated the Ionian affair as a payback to Persia, which in turn led to Darius and Hippias to start their invasion as a punishment. In general, Persia wasn't opposed to democracy per se; after the revolt was defeated, Mardonius formally replaced the Ionian tyrants with democracies, probably surmising that there would be less trouble in the long run that way.

to:

* Darius didn't invade Athens because he was "annoyed by Greek freedom" or something, but because Athens and Eretria had supported the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionian_Revolt Ionian Revolt]] in territories of his empire that were formerly Greek colonies, like Aeolis, Cyprus and Caria. There is a grain of truth in the claim, though, as previously to the revolt, Darius' brother Artaphernes had told the Athenians to ditch democracy and reinstate their deposed tyrant Hippias (who was exiled in Darius's court) as a condition for Persian help against Sparta, and it was only after hearing this that Athens broke negotiations and instigated the Ionian affair as a payback to Persia, which in turn led to Darius and Hippias to start their invasion as a punishment. In general, However, it was more of a favor to Hippias than anything personal, and Persia wasn't opposed to democracy per se; after the revolt was defeated, Mardonius formally replaced the Ionian tyrants with democracies, probably surmising that there would be less trouble in the long run that way.


Added DiffLines:

* In the film, Xerxes tempts Leonidas with joining his empire and carrying his standard to the heart of Europe. It's unclear what does he mean geographically by that (Gaul? Germania?), but in any case, the real Xerxes never showed interest in expanding in that direction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Likewise, historical Sparta was ruled by a complex system which has been streamlined in the movies. The movie portrays Leonidas as the single ruler of the city, while Sparta was actually co-ruled by ''two'' kings from two parallel dynasties, the Agiads (the branch Leonidas belongs to) and the Eurypontids. Leotychidas, the Eurypontid king of the period, is never mentioned. Like the Persian example above, Leotychidas is one of the characters featured in ''The 300 Spartans''.

to:

* Likewise, historical Sparta was ruled by a complex system which has been streamlined in the movies. The movie portrays Leonidas as the single ruler of the city, while Sparta was actually co-ruled by ''two'' kings from two parallel dynasties, the Agiads (the branch Leonidas belongs to) and the Eurypontids. Leotychidas, the Eurypontid king of the period, is never mentioned. Like the Persian example above, Leotychidas is one of the characters featured in ''The 300 Spartans''. Ironically,while neither king claimed godhood, both were given a lot of honor due to their DivineParentage: for Leonidas, Herodotus gives the whole lineage all the way to Heracles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The real Ephors weren't priests or any kind of oracular staff as portrayed in the film, but a council of secular Senators who ran the Spartan government. They were also citizens elected by popular assembly, not an endogamic caste as Dilios labels them. This is particularly odd since the Sparta from film also showcases a laic, more normal-looking citizen council which would have been a good portrayal of the Ephors from real life.

to:

* The real Ephors weren't priests or any kind of oracular staff as portrayed in the film, but a council of secular Senators who ran the Spartan government. They were also citizens elected by popular assembly, not an endogamic caste as Dilios labels them. This is particularly odd since the Sparta from film also showcases a laic, more normal-looking citizen council which would have been a good portrayal of the Ephors from real life. The closest the Spartans had to the Ephors in the movie were the ''Pythians'', officials who had the duty of acting as emissaries to the Delphi Oracle... and these were appointed by the kings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Spartan culture forbade citizens from working ''at all'' (including weaving for women), and all work was done by slave labour. We never see any of those helots in the movie.

to:

* Spartan culture forbade citizens from working ''at all'' (including weaving for women), and cooking), and all such work was done by slave labour. We never see any of those helots in the movie.

Added: 175

Changed: 119

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Spartan culture forbade citizens from working ''at all'' (including weaving for women), and all work was done by slave labour. We never see any of those helots in the movie.



* The only forces depicted for Greece at the films' Thermopylae are the 300 Spartan hoplites, an Arcadian skirmisher contingent that contributes for a small part of the battle, and some Phocian forces that are referred to but never shown. In reality, the battle featured over 4,000 troops on the Greek side (according to Herodotus, which is almost surely a lower estimate). Aside from Leonidas and his 300 ''hippei'', their army included large masses of Mycenaeans, Corinthians, Thespians and people from around Thermopylae. To be fair, several of those peoples are mentioned to have joined Leonidas and company in the graphic novel, but only the Thespians are ever shown on-page.

to:

* The only forces depicted for Greece at the films' Thermopylae are the 300 Spartan hoplites, an Arcadian skirmisher contingent that contributes for a small part of the battle, and some Phocian forces that are referred to but never shown. In reality, the battle featured over 4,000 troops on the Greek side (according to Herodotus, which is almost surely a lower estimate). Aside from Leonidas and his 300 ''hippei'', their army included large masses of Mycenaeans, Corinthians, Thespians and people from around Thermopylae. To be fair, several of those peoples are mentioned to have joined Leonidas and company in the graphic novel, but only the Thespians are ever shown on-page. Also note that those armies would have been accompanied by a train of slaves to carry supplies, food, and battle gear.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were slaves who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (and during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he [[HistoricalHeroUpgrade omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them]].

to:

* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were slaves who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (and during some periods, them. Spartans were also allowed to kill helots without religious or legal repercussions (in most ancient societies, killing a Spartan had the right slave was still considered murder, at least on paper), and ritually declared war on all helots each year, in which Spartans went out to murder helots with impunity).any helot they thought were being too strong or independent. Helot killing was also part of the coming of age ritual at the end of the agoge training (that wolf Leonidas kills? that would have been an unarmed, untrained helot). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he [[HistoricalHeroUpgrade omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
They were not "essentially" slaves, they were slaves, and our sources are abundantly clear on that fact. Helot just refers to an enslaved population, it is not an euphenism.


* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were essentially slaves in all but name who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (and during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he [[HistoricalHeroUpgrade omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them]].

to:

* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were essentially slaves in all but name who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (and during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he [[HistoricalHeroUpgrade omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were essentially slaves in all but name who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (and during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them.

to:

* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were essentially slaves in all but name who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (and during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he [[HistoricalHeroUpgrade omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them.them]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Athenian shields are portrayed as having a very plain metal finish in contrast to the lambda-decorated Spartan ones, and also come equipped with a metal boss that makes them look remarkably like Celtiberian roundshields. In real life, Athenians used the same kind of shield and were way more artistic in their decorations than Spartans: they often painted Athena's little owl or Medusa's head on them in order to symbolize their city and scare enemies away.

to:

* Athenian shields are portrayed as having a very plain metal finish in contrast to the lambda-decorated Spartan ones, and also come equipped with a metal boss that makes them look remarkably like Celtiberian roundshields. In real life, Athenians used the same kind of shield and were way more artistic in their decorations than Spartans: they often painted Athena's little owl or Medusa's head on them in order to symbolize their city and scare enemies away. Actually, only the Spartans' shields were identical because they were given to the new soldiers by the state, when they completed their Agoge, while in every other Greek city the citizens ordered and purchased their shields by themselves. The shape and size were standard and the same for any shield, but the decorations varied.



* The word "hoplite" is only used at ''one'' point in the second film, where it describes the raiders who captured Artemisia. Themistocles talks about them as if they're just a group of PsychosForHire not really associated with the Greek states. In reality, every Greek foot soldier was a hoplite. As in, it was one of the city states that were responsible for the raiding, not the hoplites themselves.

to:

* The word "hoplite" is only used at ''one'' point in the second film, where it describes the raiders who captured Artemisia. Themistocles talks about them as if they're just a group of PsychosForHire not really associated with the Greek states. In reality, every Greek foot soldier was a an hoplite. As in, it was one of the city states that were responsible for the raiding, not the hoplites themselves.



* The film shows the Greek fleet destroyed in Artemisia's bombing tactics the third day of the battle, and they only avoid a Persian victory because Artemisia's own fleet is affected too by the attack. It is underlined by this way that both Leonidas and Themistocles fail at containing the Persian invasions in their respective terrains. In real life, although suffering hard losses, the Greeks actually held at the straits of Artemisium while Leonidas failed at the Hot Gates. They only retreated when the Thermopylae pass was taken and thus defending the nearby sea became irrelevant. (That said, Themistocles and company did realize the much larger Persian fleet would end up overpowering them by sheer attrition sooner or later, so they were already considering the option of retreating, waiting for news from Leonidas, when they heard of the latter's defeat.) The Greek fleet then sailed to Athens and helped to evacuate it.

to:

* The film shows the Greek fleet destroyed in Artemisia's bombing tactics the third day of the battle, and they only avoid a Persian victory because Artemisia's own fleet is affected too by the attack. It is underlined by this way that both Leonidas and Themistocles fail at containing the Persian invasions in their respective terrains. In real life, although suffering hard losses, the Greeks actually held at the straits of Artemisium while Leonidas failed at the Hot Gates. They only retreated when the Thermopylae pass was taken and thus defending the nearby sea became irrelevant. (That said, Themistocles and company did realize the much larger Persian fleet would end up overpowering them by sheer attrition sooner or later, so they were already considering the option of retreating, waiting for news from Leonidas, when they heard of the latter's defeat.) The Greek fleet then sailed to Athens and helped to evacuate it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''300'' played a huge part in re-popularizing the memetic badassery of the ancient Spartan army, which was praised and echoed in ancient sources through centuries - only that a lot of what is known of their culture might be perfectly apocryphal and/or propagandistic in nature. Almost no first hand accounts from the period have survived, among other things because Spartans did not write their own history prior the Hellenistic period, and most of what we know of them comes entirely through the writing of other Greeks, especially those who were enamoured with Sparta's military success and wanted to paint them as an near-perfect warrior state (as well as the Spartan themselves towards their later days, when they were a shadow of its former selves, as they would have been keenly interested in playing up their reputation to draw people to visit and study there). Elements like a professional army and a strong military education were almost certainly true, as those two were enough to give Sparta a huge edge over most Greek armies of the time, but the most uncanny customs, like the ruthlessness of their eugenics program and the hardness of their TrainingFromHell, should be taken with an equally huge grain of salt.

to:

* ''300'' played a huge part in re-popularizing the memetic badassery of the ancient Spartan army, which was praised and echoed in ancient sources through centuries - -- only that a lot of what is known of their culture might be perfectly apocryphal and/or propagandistic in nature. Almost no first hand accounts from the period have survived, among other things because Spartans did not write their own history prior the Hellenistic period, and most of what we know of them comes entirely through the writing of other Greeks, especially those who were enamoured with Sparta's military success and wanted to paint them as an near-perfect warrior state (as well as the Spartan themselves towards their later days, when they were a shadow of its former selves, as they would have been keenly interested in playing up their reputation to draw people to visit and study there). Elements like a professional army and a strong military education were almost certainly true, as those two were enough to give Sparta a huge edge over most Greek armies of the time, but the most uncanny customs, like the ruthlessness of their eugenics program and the hardness of their TrainingFromHell, should be taken with an equally huge grain of salt.



* The Athenians running into Marathon in a berserker-style open field charge is just as jarring as the Spartans dueling freely in the Thermopylae. In real life, they did charge in a move previously-unseen for a slow-moving phalanx, but it was a tight, controlled march in formation, likely designed to avoid being picked apart by the Persian archers, and not a wild individual race. Thanks to it, the heavy Athenian hoplites overpowered the light Persian infantry and provided no room for the Persian cavalry to maneuver on the crowded beach. Had the actual battle been fought like the one in the movie, the Athenian forces would have likely been swarmed and obliterated by the defenders. (It's somewhat justified by the narration saying that Themistocles has the Greeks charge while the Persians are still unloading their troops, leaving them without their horses and without a lot of their troops being able to get off.)
* The word "hoplite" is only used at ''one'' point in thr second film, where it describes the raiders who captured Artemesia. Themistocles talks about them as if they're just a group of PsychosForHire not really associated with the Greek states. In reality, every Greek foot soldier was a hoplite. As in, it was one of the city states that were responsible for the raiding, not the hoplites themselves.

to:

* The Athenians running into Marathon in a berserker-style open field charge is just as jarring as the Spartans dueling freely in the Thermopylae. In real life, they did charge in a move previously-unseen for a slow-moving phalanx, but it was a tight, controlled march in formation, likely designed to avoid being picked apart by the Persian archers, and not a wild individual race. Thanks to it, the heavy Athenian hoplites overpowered the light Persian infantry and provided no room for the Persian cavalry to maneuver on the crowded beach. Had the actual battle been fought like the one in the movie, the Athenian forces would have likely been swarmed and obliterated by the defenders. (It's somewhat justified by the narration saying that Themistocles has the Greeks charge while the Persians are still unloading their troops, leaving them without their horses and without a lot of their troops being able to get off. But historically, the Athenians and Plataeans charged at Marathon after an approximately five-day standoff, and one theory about why they charged when did is that the cavalry were actually ''re-embarking'' to go attack Athens, which left the Persian infantry vulnerable.)
* The word "hoplite" is only used at ''one'' point in thr the second film, where it describes the raiders who captured Artemesia.Artemisia. Themistocles talks about them as if they're just a group of PsychosForHire not really associated with the Greek states. In reality, every Greek foot soldier was a hoplite. As in, it was one of the city states that were responsible for the raiding, not the hoplites themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The film shows Leonidas having his [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agoge agoge]] hunting alone in the mountains as a young boy. In real life, boys in the Spartan training regime weren't sent alone to hunting trips, but in small groups, as they were expected to care for each other and learn how to function as an organized team just like they would do on the battlefield.

to:

* The film shows Leonidas having his [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agoge agoge]] hunting alone in the mountains as a young boy. In real life, boys in the Spartan training regime weren't sent alone to hunting trips, but in small groups, as they were expected to care for each other and learn how to function as an organized team just like they would do on the battlefield. They weren't sent into the wilderness either. They were sent out to villages to rob and murder helots without getting caught, [[DoWrongRight and if they were caught, they'd be punished]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The word "hoplite" is only used at ''one'' point in thr second film, where it describes the raiders who captured Artemesia. Themistocles talks about them as if they're just a group of PsychosForHire not really associated with the Greek states. In reality, every Greek foot soldier was a hoplite. As in, it was one of the city states that were responsible for the raiding, not the hoplites themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were essentially slaves in all but name who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them.
* ''300'' played a huge part in re-popularizing the memetic badassery of the ancient Spartan army, which was praised and echoed in ancient sources through centuries - only that a lot of what is known of their culture might be perfectly apocryphal and/or propagandistic in nature. Almost no first hand accounts from the period have survived, among other things because Spartans did not write their own history prior the Hellenistic period, and most of what we know of them comes entirely through the writing of other Greeks, especially those who were enamoured with Sparta's military success and wanted to paint them as an near-perfect warrior state (as well as the Spartan themselves towards their later days, when they were a shadow of its former selves, as they would have been keenly interested in playing up their reputation to draw people to visit and study there). Elements like a professional army and a strong military education were almost certainly true, as those two were enough to give Sparta a huge edge over most Greek armies of the time, but the most uncanny customs, like the ruthlessness of their eugenics program and the hardness of their TrainingFromHell (and possibly their famed female power), should be taken with an equally huge grain of salt.
* Leaving aside the debate about whether Xerxes was a tyrant, the films' contrast between the "freedom-loving" Greece and the "proslavery" Persia is an unrealistic coup of BlackAndWhiteMorality. In reality, both countries supported and allowed for slavery in one form or another, just like every other nation in the world at the time, so the propagation of slavery per se was not among the Greeks' worries. Those who fought against the empire had the worry that they would be enslaved if they lost, but this again was common practice in Greece, Persia and just everywhere else. The undemocratic feudal nature of the Persian state, the high concentration of power in the monarch, and the description of his subjects as ''bandaka'' ("bonded") may have given the Greeks the impression that all Persian subjects were both nominally[[note]]Thus ''bandaka'' was translated ''doulos'', "slave."[[/note]] and substantially slaves of the king. The claims of some Greek writers that imperial troops were driven to battle by officers cracking whips probably only worsened the Greeks's already paranoid views on their empire.
* As listed in the Characters entry below, the Achaemenid Empire was one of the first religiously tolerant empires that stuck for centuries. The god-like characterization of Xerxes is entirely inaccurate, as such a belief would be blasphemous in UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}}, his personal religion. Achaemenid kings were known to present themselves as gods in Egypt, where that was the correct thing to do, or as pious devotees of other peoples' gods, as in the Cyrus Cylinder of Babylon--essentially, whatever was best for PR--but among themselves the King and the ethnic Persians venerated Ahura Mazda and the other subjects whatever divinity they liked. This was another reason why Hebrews quite liked the Persian Empire, which liberated them from the clutches of the Babylonians in the process of conquering Babylon itself.

to:

* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were essentially slaves in all but name who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (during (and during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them.
* ''300'' played a huge part in re-popularizing the memetic badassery of the ancient Spartan army, which was praised and echoed in ancient sources through centuries - only that a lot of what is known of their culture might be perfectly apocryphal and/or propagandistic in nature. Almost no first hand accounts from the period have survived, among other things because Spartans did not write their own history prior the Hellenistic period, and most of what we know of them comes entirely through the writing of other Greeks, especially those who were enamoured with Sparta's military success and wanted to paint them as an near-perfect warrior state (as well as the Spartan themselves towards their later days, when they were a shadow of its former selves, as they would have been keenly interested in playing up their reputation to draw people to visit and study there). Elements like a professional army and a strong military education were almost certainly true, as those two were enough to give Sparta a huge edge over most Greek armies of the time, but the most uncanny customs, like the ruthlessness of their eugenics program and the hardness of their TrainingFromHell (and possibly their famed female power), TrainingFromHell, should be taken with an equally huge grain of salt.
* Leaving aside the debate about whether Xerxes was a tyrant, the films' contrast between the "freedom-loving" Greece and the "proslavery" Persia is an unrealistic coup of BlackAndWhiteMorality. In reality, both countries supported and allowed for slavery in one form or another, just like every other nation in the world at the time, so the propagation of slavery per se was not among the Greeks' worries. Those who fought against the empire had the worry that they would be enslaved if they lost, but this again was common practice in Greece, Persia and just everywhere else. The undemocratic feudal nature of the Persian state, the high concentration of power in the monarch, and the description of his subjects as ''bandaka'' ("bonded") may have given the Greeks the impression that all Persian subjects were both nominally[[note]]Thus nominally and substantially slaves of the king.[[note]]Thus ''bandaka'' was translated ''doulos'', "slave."[[/note]] and substantially slaves of the king. The claims of some Greek writers that imperial troops were driven to battle by officers cracking whips probably only worsened the Greeks's already paranoid views on their empire.
* As listed in the Characters entry below, the Achaemenid Empire was one of the first very religiously tolerant empires that stuck for centuries. The god-like and none of its kings ever demanded to be worshipped as a god. This characterization of Xerxes is entirely inaccurate, as such a belief would be blasphemous in UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}}, his personal religion. Achaemenid kings were known to present themselves as gods in Egypt, where that was the correct thing to do, or as pious devotees of other peoples' gods, as in the Cyrus Cylinder of Babylon--essentially, whatever was best for PR--but among themselves the King and the ethnic Persians venerated Ahura Mazda and the other subjects whatever divinity they liked. This was another reason why Hebrews quite liked the Persian Empire, which liberated them from the clutches of the Babylonians in the process of conquering Babylon itself.



* Gerard Butler, Sullivan Stapleton and company fight in leather underwear, while the historical Greeks didn't step on the battlefield without several kilograms of bronze body armor. This is actually AdaptationalModesty from the comic book, where the Spartans occasionally fight completely naked except for their cape and helmet. Miller took this from Greco-Roman art, where gods and heroes were often depicted nude to symbolize their inherent power, beauty and badassery. Greek art occasionally shows hoplites fighting naked or even in only armor (which would chafe mightily), but this was probably artistic license even at the time; normally they are shown in tunics.

to:

* Gerard Butler, Sullivan Stapleton and company fight in leather underwear, while the historical Greeks Greek hoplites didn't step on the battlefield without several some kilograms of bronze body armor. This is actually AdaptationalModesty from the comic book, where the Spartans occasionally fight completely naked except for their cape and helmet. Miller took this from Greco-Roman art, where gods and heroes were often depicted nude to symbolize their inherent power, beauty and badassery. Greek art occasionally shows hoplites fighting naked or even in only armor (which would chafe mightily), but this was probably artistic license even at the time; normally time, and otherwise they are shown in tunics.



* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dory_(spear) dory]] spear, the primary weapon of Greek hoplites, was NOT thrown. Despite Leonidas and his men shown throwing theirs with ease, these spears were too heavy and too long to be thrown. They did use regular javelins, but those were shorter and lighter.

to:

* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dory_(spear) dory]] spear, the primary weapon of Greek hoplites, was NOT thrown. Despite Leonidas and his men shown throwing theirs with ease, these spears were too heavy and too long to be thrown.thrown comfortably and with the hope of actually hitting the target. They did use regular javelins, but those were shorter and lighter.



* The films portray the Greek ships as smaller and more maneuverable than their Persian equivalents, which is exactly the opposite of the real situation: the Greeks ships were big, cumbersome and manned by less experienced sailors, so they typically put their trust more in their ship-borne hoplite marines to board and capture the enemy ships than in any inherent sailing advantage.

to:

* The films portray follow pop culture by portraying the Greek ships as smaller and more maneuverable than their Persian equivalents, which is exactly the opposite of the real situation: the Greeks ships were big, cumbersome and manned by less experienced sailors, so they typically put their trust more in their ship-borne hoplite marines to board and capture the enemy ships than in any inherent sailing advantage.



* The film shows tribal warriors from the DarkestAfrica between the Persian forces. There is a mention by Herodotus that Xerxes' army brought black warriors from Ethiopia, but if this was the case, those would have been equipped with Egyptian armors and weapons, if not even Persian ones (as there is piece of artwork, popularly called the "Negro Alabastrons", which shows what appears to be a black man in Persian warrior garments).

to:

* The film shows tribal warriors from the DarkestAfrica between the Persian forces. There is a mention by Herodotus that Xerxes' army brought black warriors from Ethiopia, but if this was the case, those would have been equipped with Egyptian armors and weapons, if not even Persian ones (as (in fact, there is piece of artwork, popularly called the "Negro Alabastrons", which shows what appears to be a black man in Persian warrior garments).



* Gorgo's role is amped up in both films, particularly in the second, where she personally leads the Spartan fleet. Historical examples of Greek women assisting in wars do exist, like [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydna Hydna]], who helped to sabotage the Persian fleet before Artemisium, but most Greeks didn't like females getting directly involved with warfare. They even offered a prize of 10,000 drachmas for Artemisia's capture only because she was a woman general.

to:

* Gorgo's role is amped up in both films, particularly in the second, where she personally leads the Spartan fleet. Historical examples of Greek women assisting in wars do exist, like [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydna Hydna]], who helped to sabotage the Persian fleet before Artemisium, but most Greeks didn't like females getting directly involved with warfare. They warfare (not even the Spartans themselves, who trained their women to be able to manage their country with the only goal that every male available could be deployed for war), and this attitude would remain even after the Hellenistic age brought more than a handful of battling queens. In this case, they even offered a prize of 10,000 drachmas for Artemisia's capture only because she was a woman general.



* The historical Xerxes is depicted in ancient artwork as having a long beard and hair and wearing elaborate royal robes, as Zoroastrian tradition demanded. Making public appearances while shaven of face and head, nearly naked and wearing body piercings would have been savagely offensive.

to:

* The historical Xerxes is depicted in ancient artwork as having a long beard and hair and wearing elaborate royal robes, as Zoroastrian tradition demanded. Making public appearances while shaven of face and head, nearly naked and wearing body piercings would have been savagely offensive.offensive, especially in a culture like that of Persia, where nudity or merely showing a lot of skin was a huge taboo.



* [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemisia_I_of_Caria Artemisia]] wasn't a warrior brought up from slavery, but the queen of Halicarnassus, a Greek city in western Turkey under Persian rule. Also, while she really served at Artemisium and Salamis and was in charge of a large part of the Persian fleet (the forces of Cos, Nysiros, Calyndos and her own personal ships), she was not the fleet's supreme commander: she shared command with Xerxes's younger brothers, Achaemenes and Ariabignes.

to:

* [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemisia_I_of_Caria Artemisia]] wasn't a warrior brought up from slavery, but the queen of Halicarnassus, a Greek city in western Turkey under Persian rule. Also, while she really served at Artemisium and Salamis and was in charge of a large part of the Persian fleet (the forces of Cos, Nysiros, Calyndos and her own personal ships), she was not the fleet's supreme commander: she commander, but shared command with Xerxes's younger brothers, Achaemenes and Ariabignes.Ariabignes. The film is accurate in showing her a close advisor to Xerxes' though.



* Likewise, historical Sparta was ruled by a complex system which has been streamlined in the movies. The movie portrays Leonidas as the single ruler of the city, while Sparta was actually co-ruled by ''two'' kings from two parallel dynasties, the Agiads (the branch Leonidas belongs to) and the Eurypontids. Leotychidas, the Eurypontid king, is never mentioned. Like the Persian example above, Leotychidas is one of the characters featured in ''The 300 Spartans''.

to:

* Likewise, historical Sparta was ruled by a complex system which has been streamlined in the movies. The movie portrays Leonidas as the single ruler of the city, while Sparta was actually co-ruled by ''two'' kings from two parallel dynasties, the Agiads (the branch Leonidas belongs to) and the Eurypontids. Leotychidas, the Eurypontid king, king of the period, is never mentioned. Like the Persian example above, Leotychidas is one of the characters featured in ''The 300 Spartans''.



* Darius didn't invade Athens because he was "annoyed by Greek freedom" or something, but because Athens and Eretria had supported the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionian_Revolt Ionian Revolt]] in territories of his empire that were formerly Greek colonies, like Aeolis, Cyprus and Caria. There is a grain of truth in the claim, though, as Darius' brother Artaphernes had previously told the Athenians to ditch democracy and reinstate their deposed tyrant Hippias (who was exiled in Darius's court) as a condition for Persian help against Sparta. It was only after hearing this that Athens broke negotiations and participated in the Ionian Revolt as a payback to Persia, which in turn led to Darius and Hippias to start their invasion as a punishment. In general, Persia wasn't opposed to democracy per se; after the Revolt was defeated, Mardonius formally replaced the Ionian tyrants with democracies, probably surmising that there would be less trouble in the long run that way.
* Neither Darius nor Xerxes were personally present at the Battle of Marathon, and the former certainly was not killed by Themistocles. He died well after it and in different circumstances, so Xerxes didn't invade Greece by the desire to avenge his father, but merely to follow up with his campaign.
* The incident in which the Spartans threw their Persian emissaries into a well did happen, at least according to Herodotus, but not during Xerxes's reign. It happened during his father Darius', and its outcome was hardly limited to Sparta, as Athenians did the same, although they were characteristically delicate enough to judge the messengers before tossing them to the pit (speaking of which, the Spartans realized they had gone a bit overboard, so they sent two of their people to be executed in Persia as a reparation).[[note]]Xerxes actually ''refused'' and simply sent the two back to Sparta[[/note]] As Xerxes knew of these events, he omitted Athens and Sparta when he sent messengers to the Greek cities.
* The Battle of Thermopylae happened during the Carnea just as portrayed in the film, but the Ephors weren't secretly working for Xerxes and had the right priorities, so they allowed Leonidas to send a military expedition. It was Leonidas himself who choose to take only his 300-man ''hippei'' force and a support team of helots. They did forbid him once to do so due to the Carnea, but that was during the Battle of Marathon, not Thermopylae, and modern interpretations of primary sources indicate that in either or both cases, this may not have been the whole truth; the Spartan heartland was in the very south of mainland Greece and an army would need to pass through the much more defensible isthmus of Corinth to threaten them. After Thermopylai, it took the Athenians threatening to defect to the Persians (who, by the way, had just ''sacked and destroyed'' Athens) to get the Spartans to turn out for Plataia.

to:

* Darius didn't invade Athens because he was "annoyed by Greek freedom" or something, but because Athens and Eretria had supported the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionian_Revolt Ionian Revolt]] in territories of his empire that were formerly Greek colonies, like Aeolis, Cyprus and Caria. There is a grain of truth in the claim, though, as previously to the revolt, Darius' brother Artaphernes had previously told the Athenians to ditch democracy and reinstate their deposed tyrant Hippias (who was exiled in Darius's court) as a condition for Persian help against Sparta. It Sparta, and it was only after hearing this that Athens broke negotiations and participated in instigated the Ionian Revolt affair as a payback to Persia, which in turn led to Darius and Hippias to start their invasion as a punishment. In general, Persia wasn't opposed to democracy per se; after the Revolt revolt was defeated, Mardonius formally replaced the Ionian tyrants with democracies, probably surmising that there would be less trouble in the long run that way.
* Neither Darius nor Xerxes were personally present at the Battle of Marathon, where the Persian forces were commanded by Datis, and the former Darius certainly was not killed by Themistocles. He died well after it and in different circumstances, so Xerxes didn't invade Greece by the desire to avenge his father, but merely to follow up with his campaign.
* The incident in which the Spartans threw their Persian emissaries into a well did happen, at least according to Herodotus, but not during Xerxes's reign. It happened during his father Darius', and its outcome was hardly limited to Sparta, as Athenians did the same, although they were characteristically delicate enough to judge the messengers before tossing them to the pit (speaking of which, the Spartans realized they had gone a bit overboard, so they sent two of their people to be executed in Persia as a reparation).[[note]]Xerxes actually ''refused'' reparation, though Xerxes declined and simply sent the two back to Sparta[[/note]] them back). As Xerxes knew of these events, he omitted Athens and Sparta when he sent messengers to the Greek cities.
* The Battle of Thermopylae happened during the Carnea just as portrayed in the film, but the Ephors weren't secretly working for Xerxes and had the right priorities, so they allowed Leonidas to send a military expedition. It was Leonidas himself who choose to take only his 300-man ''hippei'' force and a support team of helots. They did forbid him once to do so due to the Carnea, but that was during the Battle of Marathon, not Thermopylae, and modern interpretations of primary sources indicate that in either or both cases, this may not have been the whole truth; the Spartan heartland was in the very south of mainland Greece and an army would need to pass through the much more defensible isthmus of Corinth to threaten them. After Thermopylai, it took the Athenians threatening to defect to the Persians (who, by the way, had just ''sacked and destroyed'' Athens) to get the Spartans to turn out again for Plataia.



* Leonidas's LastStand happened historically, but under different circumstances. He didn't sacrifice himself to inspire the rest of Greek states to mobilize to war like in the film, as they were all already fighting along with him and thus there was no need of any inspirational immolation. Instead, when Leonidas realized the Persians would flank them thanks to Ephialtes, he ordered the other city-states' armies to retreat while his own forces and Demophilus' (along with an extra Theban contingent that wanted to surrender) remained behind to give them more time to escape. The trope played there, thus, wasn't a ThanatosGambit, but a YouShallNotPass. However, it's recorded in sources that the Oracle of Delphi told the Spartans their king's death would be necessary to win the war, so it's possible that Leonidas decided to offer his life at least partially out of religious fervor.

to:

* Leonidas's LastStand happened historically, but under different circumstances. He didn't sacrifice himself to inspire the rest of Greek states to mobilize to war like in the film, as they were all already fighting along with him and thus there was no need of any inspirational immolation. Instead, when Leonidas realized the Persians would flank them thanks to Ephialtes, he ordered the other city-states' armies to retreat while his own forces and Demophilus' remained behind to give them more time to escape (along with an extra Theban contingent that stayed because they wanted to surrender) remained behind to give them more time to escape.surrender). The trope played there, thus, wasn't a ThanatosGambit, but a YouShallNotPass. However, it's recorded in sources that the Oracle of Delphi told the Spartans their king's death would be necessary to win the war, so it's possible that Leonidas decided to offer his life at least partially out of religious fervor.



* Ironically, the film's rendition of the Battle of Marathon shows Themistocles at the head of the Athenians absolutely wasting Persians left and right. In real life, the Athenian center was indeed commanded by Themistocles and Aristides, but the troop arrangement planned by their general Miltiades gave them very thin lines, as most of their Greek forces were concentrated on the wings, and as a consequence, the center ended up being driven back and pursued; it was only when the more powerful wings crushed the Persian flanks that the Persian center was pushed back itself and routed. You could still consider Themistocles a badass for ensuring the Athenian center didn't completely collapse, and not any less for coming alive from such a dire situation, though.

to:

* Ironically, the film's rendition of the Battle of Marathon shows Themistocles at the head of the Athenians absolutely wasting Persians left and right. In real life, the Athenian center was indeed commanded by Themistocles and Aristides, but the troop arrangement planned by their general Miltiades gave them very thin lines, as most of their Greek forces were concentrated on the wings, and as a consequence, the center ended up being driven back and pursued; back; it was only when the more powerful wings crushed the Persian flanks that the Persian center was pushed back itself and routed. You could still consider Themistocles a badass for ensuring the Athenian center didn't completely collapse, though, and not any less for coming alive from such a dire situation, though.situation.

Added: 2179

Changed: 8462

Removed: 471

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''300'' played a huge part in re-popularizing the memetic badassery of the ancient Spartan army, which was praised and echoed in ancient sources through centuries - only that a lot of what is known of their culture is probably apocryphal and/or propagandistic in nature. Almost no first hand accounts from the period have survived, among other things because Spartans did not write their own history prior the Hellenistic period, and most of what we know of them comes entirely through the writing of other Greeks, especially those who were enamoured with Sparta's military success and wanted to paint them as an near-perfect warrior state (as well as the Spartan themselves towards their later days, when they were a shadow of its former selves, as they would have been keenly interested in playing up their reputation to draw people to visit and study there). Elements like a professional army and a strong military education were almost certainly true, as those two were enough to give Sparta a huge edge over most Greek armies of the time, but the most uncanny customs, like their ruthless eugenics and their insane TrainingFromHell (and possibly their famed female power) should be taken with an equally huge grain of salt.
* Leaving aside the debate about whether Xerxes was a tyrant, the films' contrast between the "freedom-loving" Greece and the "proslavery" Persia is an unrealistic coup of BlackAndWhiteMorality. In reality, both countries supported and allowed for slavery in one form or another, just like every other nation in the world at the time, so the propagation of slavery per se was not among the Greeks' worries. Those who fought against the empire had the worry that they would be enslaved if they lost, but this again was common practice in Greece, Persia and everywhere else. The undemocratic feudal nature of the Persian state, the high concentration of power in the monarch, and the description of his subjects as ''bandaka'' ("bonded") may have given the Greeks the impression that all Persian subjects were nominally[[note]]Thus ''bandaka'' was translated ''doulos'', "slave."[[/note]] and substantially slaves of the king. The claims of some Greek writers that imperial troops were driven to battle by officers cracking whips probably only worsened the Greeks's already paranoid views on their empire.
* As listed in the Characters entry below, the Achaemenid Empire was one of the first religiously tolerant societies that stuck for centuries. The god-like characterization of Xerxes is entirely inaccurate, as such a belief would be blasphemous in UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}}, his personal religion. Achaemenid kings were known to present themselves as gods in Egypt, where that was the correct thing to do, or as pious devotees of other peoples' gods, as in the Cyrus Cylinder of Babylon--essentially, whatever was best for PR--but among themselves the King and the ethnic Persians venerated Ahura Mazda and the other subjects whatever divinity they liked. This was another reason why Hebrews quite liked the Persian Empire, which liberated them from the clutches of the Babylonians in the process of conquering Babylon itself.
* Dilios and the Spartan soldiers show an utter disdain for the Ephors and the supernatural in general. However, by ancient Greek standards, Spartans were exceptionally religious; they obeyed Carnea to a fault and would have never dared to mock Hellenic priests or festivals.
* The real Ephors weren't priests or any kind of oracular staff as portrayed in the film, but a council of secular Senators who ran the Spartan government. They were also citizens elected by popular assembly, not an endogamic caste as Dilios labels them. This is particularly odd since the Sparta from film also showcases a laic, more normal-looking citizen council which would have been identical to the Ephors from real life.

to:

* ''300'' played a huge part in re-popularizing the memetic badassery of the ancient Spartan army, which was praised and echoed in ancient sources through centuries - only that a lot of what is known of their culture is probably might be perfectly apocryphal and/or propagandistic in nature. Almost no first hand accounts from the period have survived, among other things because Spartans did not write their own history prior the Hellenistic period, and most of what we know of them comes entirely through the writing of other Greeks, especially those who were enamoured with Sparta's military success and wanted to paint them as an near-perfect warrior state (as well as the Spartan themselves towards their later days, when they were a shadow of its former selves, as they would have been keenly interested in playing up their reputation to draw people to visit and study there). Elements like a professional army and a strong military education were almost certainly true, as those two were enough to give Sparta a huge edge over most Greek armies of the time, but the most uncanny customs, like the ruthlessness of their ruthless eugenics program and the hardness of their insane TrainingFromHell (and possibly their famed female power) power), should be taken with an equally huge grain of salt.
* Leaving aside the debate about whether Xerxes was a tyrant, the films' contrast between the "freedom-loving" Greece and the "proslavery" Persia is an unrealistic coup of BlackAndWhiteMorality. In reality, both countries supported and allowed for slavery in one form or another, just like every other nation in the world at the time, so the propagation of slavery per se was not among the Greeks' worries. Those who fought against the empire had the worry that they would be enslaved if they lost, but this again was common practice in Greece, Persia and just everywhere else. The undemocratic feudal nature of the Persian state, the high concentration of power in the monarch, and the description of his subjects as ''bandaka'' ("bonded") may have given the Greeks the impression that all Persian subjects were both nominally[[note]]Thus ''bandaka'' was translated ''doulos'', "slave."[[/note]] and substantially slaves of the king. The claims of some Greek writers that imperial troops were driven to battle by officers cracking whips probably only worsened the Greeks's already paranoid views on their empire.
* As listed in the Characters entry below, the Achaemenid Empire was one of the first religiously tolerant societies empires that stuck for centuries. The god-like characterization of Xerxes is entirely inaccurate, as such a belief would be blasphemous in UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}}, his personal religion. Achaemenid kings were known to present themselves as gods in Egypt, where that was the correct thing to do, or as pious devotees of other peoples' gods, as in the Cyrus Cylinder of Babylon--essentially, whatever was best for PR--but among themselves the King and the ethnic Persians venerated Ahura Mazda and the other subjects whatever divinity they liked. This was another reason why Hebrews quite liked the Persian Empire, which liberated them from the clutches of the Babylonians in the process of conquering Babylon itself.
* Dilios and the Spartan soldiers show an utter disdain for the Ephors and the supernatural in general. However, by ancient Greek standards, Spartans were exceptionally religious; they obeyed Carnea to a fault religious and would have never dared to mock Hellenic priests or festivals.
festivals, which is why they observed Carnea to a fault. Dilios's attitude towards religious traditions could have been believable in a Greek philosopher, but not a soldier, and much less a Spartan.
* The real Ephors weren't priests or any kind of oracular staff as portrayed in the film, but a council of secular Senators who ran the Spartan government. They were also citizens elected by popular assembly, not an endogamic caste as Dilios labels them. This is particularly odd since the Sparta from film also showcases a laic, more normal-looking citizen council which would have been identical to a good portrayal of the Ephors from real life.



* In the scene after Leonidas was born, the film shows an elder examining him on a clifftop while the narrator states that he would have been discarded if he was "small, or puny, or sickly", and then pans to the bottom and shows a number of baby bones. While Ancient Sparta did commit eugenic infanticide, they tested the baby by bathing him in wine and exposing him to the elements on a mountain, and babies that failed the test would be left to die there rather than being thrown off a cliff. Some children didn't even die, and instead were adopted by and raised as helots.

to:

* In the scene after Leonidas was born, the film shows an elder examining him on a clifftop while the narrator states that he would have been discarded if he was "small, or puny, or sickly", and then pans to the bottom and shows a number of baby bones. While Ancient Sparta did commit eugenic infanticide, or at least it was claimed so, they reportedly tested the baby by bathing him in wine and exposing him to the elements on a mountain, and babies that failed the test would be left to die there rather than being thrown off a cliff. Some children didn't even die, and instead were adopted by and raised as helots.



* While the historical Spartan soldiers did have their reasons to be derisive towards the rest of the Greek armies (most of them were neither professional nor as disciplined as theirs) the films give the impression that they were the only Greek nation skilled at frontal war: out of the rest, the Arcadians are lightly-armed skirmishers only good for ambushes, while the Athenian soldiers are tough but decidedly inferior to their Spartan homologues. Actually, most Hellenic nations were capable of forming competent phalanges, and some of them, like Thebes and Macedon, were or became ''better'' at it than Sparta. In fact, Leonidas was happy to trust the front lines to their many allies at Thermopylae in a rotating movement, as by doing so they avoided attrition and he allowed for some rest for his own troops.

to:

* While the historical Spartan soldiers did have their reasons to be derisive towards the rest of the Greek armies (most of them were neither professional nor as disciplined as theirs) theirs), the films give the impression that they were the only Greek nation skilled at frontal war: out of the rest, the Arcadians are lightly-armed skirmishers only good for ambushes, while the Athenian soldiers are tough but decidedly inferior to their Spartan homologues. Actually, most Hellenic nations were capable of forming competent phalanges, and some of them, like Thebes and Macedon, were or became ''better'' at it than Sparta. In fact, Leonidas was happy to trust the front lines to their many allies at Thermopylae in a rotating movement, as by doing so they avoided attrition and he allowed for some rest for his own troops.



* Greeks did have a kind of double-headed battle axe, the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labrys labrys]], as it is shown at the Battle of Marathon in the second film. However, it seems that its usage was mostly ceremonial and limited to the Minoan territory; it had no place in the tight formation warfare used by Greek hoplites.
* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspis aspis]] shield was not a single piece of bronze as portrayed in the film. It was composed of a ''wooden'' base with only a thin bronze, fabric or hide facing. Ironically, the Athenian aspides from the sequel are surely shown to be made of wood, only without the metal coating.
* Athenian shields are portrayed as very plain wooden pieces in contrast to the lambda-decorated Spartan ones. In real life, Athenians used the same kind of shield and were way more artistic in their decorations than Spartans: they often painted Athena's little owl or Medusa's head on them in order to symbolize their city and scare enemies away.
* The films portray the Greek ships as smaller and more maneuverable than their Persian equivalents, which is exactly the opposite of the real situation: the Greeks ships were big, cumbersome and manned by unexperienced sailors, so they typically put their trust more in their ship-borne hoplite marines to board and capture the enemy ships than in any inherent sailing advantage.

to:

* Greeks did have a kind of double-headed battle axe, the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labrys labrys]], as it is shown at the Battle of Marathon in the second film. However, it seems that its usage was mostly ceremonial and limited to the Minoan territory; it had no place in the tight formation type of warfare used by Greek hoplites.
waged in continental Greece.
* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspis aspis]] shield was not a single piece of bronze as portrayed in the film. It was composed of a ''wooden'' base with only a thin bronze, fabric or hide facing. Ironically, the Athenian aspides from the sequel are surely shown to be made of wood, only without the metal coating.
facing.
* Athenian shields are portrayed as having a very plain wooden pieces metal finish in contrast to the lambda-decorated Spartan ones.ones, and also come equipped with a metal boss that makes them look remarkably like Celtiberian roundshields. In real life, Athenians used the same kind of shield and were way more artistic in their decorations than Spartans: they often painted Athena's little owl or Medusa's head on them in order to symbolize their city and scare enemies away.
* Persian marines in the second film's flashbacks of Marathon can be seen wielding [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khopesh khopeshes]], a kind of Egyptian saber that fell out of use around 1300 BC.
* The films portray the Greek ships as smaller and more maneuverable than their Persian equivalents, which is exactly the opposite of the real situation: the Greeks ships were big, cumbersome and manned by unexperienced less experienced sailors, so they typically put their trust more in their ship-borne hoplite marines to board and capture the enemy ships than in any inherent sailing advantage.



* The Athenians running into Marathon in a barbarian-style open field charge is just as jarring as the Spartans dueling freely in the Thermopylae. In real life, they did charge in a sort of previously-unseen move in order for their slow-moving phalanx to not be picked apart by Persian archers, but it was a tight, controlled march in formation and not a wild individual race. As a result, the heavy phalanx-based Athenian hoplites overpowered the light Persian infantry and provided no room for the Persian cavalry to maneuver on the crowded beach. Had the actual battle been fought like the one in the movie, the Athenian forces would have likely been swarmed and obliterated by the defenders. (It's somewhat justified by the narration saying that Themistocles has the Greeks charge while the Persians are still unloading their troops, leaving them without their horses and without a lot of their troops being able to get off.)
* In the film version of the Battle of Artemisium, the Athenian fleet executes an interesting-looking wheel formation to cut with their agile prows any frontal enemy advance. Considering that Greeks ships were actually the least experienced and maneuverable ones in real life, this tactic would have probably been suicidally complex for them to attempt, and would have only got them tangled and turned into easy targets for the expert Persian navy (which was crewed by maritime peoples like the Phoenicians). Herodotus describes the Greek formation as a side-to-side crescent or circle, not a wheel, and they apparently broke it quickly in order to charge. The Greek defense was not as wickedly efficient as shown in the film, either; even although they did repel the Persians for the duration of the battle, the Greeks got technically the shorter end of the stick because the losses were happening in even numbers despite the vastly different sizes of their armies (the Persian navy was so numerically superior that it could afford much more losses than the small Greek fleet).

to:

* The film shows tribal warriors from the DarkestAfrica between the Persian forces. There is a mention by Herodotus that Xerxes' army brought black warriors from Ethiopia, but if this was the case, those would have been equipped with Egyptian armors and weapons, if not even Persian ones (as there is piece of artwork, popularly called the "Negro Alabastrons", which shows what appears to be a black man in Persian warrior garments).
* The Athenians running into Marathon in a barbarian-style berserker-style open field charge is just as jarring as the Spartans dueling freely in the Thermopylae. In real life, they did charge in a sort of move previously-unseen move in order for their a slow-moving phalanx to not be picked apart by Persian archers, phalanx, but it was a tight, controlled march in formation formation, likely designed to avoid being picked apart by the Persian archers, and not a wild individual race. As a result, Thanks to it, the heavy phalanx-based Athenian hoplites overpowered the light Persian infantry and provided no room for the Persian cavalry to maneuver on the crowded beach. Had the actual battle been fought like the one in the movie, the Athenian forces would have likely been swarmed and obliterated by the defenders. (It's somewhat justified by the narration saying that Themistocles has the Greeks charge while the Persians are still unloading their troops, leaving them without their horses and without a lot of their troops being able to get off.)
* In the film version of the Battle of Artemisium, the Athenian fleet executes an interesting-looking wheel formation to cut with their agile prows any frontal enemy advance. Considering that Greeks ships were actually the least experienced and maneuverable ones in real life, this tactic would have probably been suicidally complex for them to attempt, and would have only got them tangled and turned into easy targets for the expert Persian navy (which was crewed by more maritime peoples like the Phoenicians). Herodotus describes the Greek formation as a side-to-side crescent or circle, not a wheel, and they apparently broke it quickly in order to charge. The Greek defense was not as wickedly efficient as shown in the film, either; even although they did repel the Persians for the duration of the battle, the Greeks got technically the shorter end of the stick because the losses were happening in even numbers despite the vastly different sizes of their armies (the Persian navy was so numerically superior that it could afford much more losses than the small Greek fleet).



* As noted, the real Xerxes was a [[UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}} Zoroastrian]], meaning that he would have considered the idea of declaring himself god-king blasphemy. Similarly, his court of magi and priests being ordered to "turn him into a god" would have been even more shocked, if not downright offended at the request. The idea of Xerxes being a god was actually born of a misunderstanding of the process of ''[[KneelBeforeZod proskynesis]]'', which the Greeks viewed as only being acceptable for a deity. In other words, the Persians didn't treat their ruler as a god, but the Greeks ''thought'' they did.

to:

* As noted, the real Xerxes was a [[UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}} Zoroastrian]], meaning that he would have considered the idea of declaring himself god-king blasphemy. Similarly, his court of magi and priests being ordered to "turn him into a god" would have been even more shocked, confused, if not downright offended at the request. The idea of Xerxes being a god was actually born of a misunderstanding of the process of ''[[KneelBeforeZod proskynesis]]'', which the Greeks viewed as only being acceptable for a deity. In other words, the Persians didn't treat their ruler as a god, but the Greeks ''thought'' they did.



** Likewise, historical Sparta was ruled by a complex system which has been streamlined in the movies. The movie portrays Leonidas as the single ruler of the city, while Sparta was actually co-ruled by ''two'' kings from two parallel dynasties, the Agiads (the branch Leonidas belongs to) and the Eurypontids. Leotychidas, the Eurypontid king, is never mentioned. Like the Persian example above, Leotychidas is one of the characters featured in ''The 300 Spartans''.
* Another important character from ''The 300 Spartans'' that gets AdaptedOut, this time on the Greek side, is [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demophilus_of_Thespiae Demophilus]], the leader of a contingent of 700 Thespians (more than twice Leonidas' forces) who refused to retreat and died there along with the Spartans. This point is somewhat of a filmic deviation from the ''300'' graphic novel, though, as a small Thespian force appears in it guarding the mountain pass before being butchered.
* Artemisia didn't die during the Battle of Salamis. In fact, she escaped from the battle by attacking the ship of a Persian king under her command who was a personal enemy to her, which tricked the Greeks into letting her sail away in the belief she was deserting from Xerxes' army (fortunately for Artemisia, the ally ship sunk and its entire crew drowned, leaving no one behind to tell Xerxes). Ironically, this would have been perfectly in-character for her portrayal in the film.

to:

** * Likewise, historical Sparta was ruled by a complex system which has been streamlined in the movies. The movie portrays Leonidas as the single ruler of the city, while Sparta was actually co-ruled by ''two'' kings from two parallel dynasties, the Agiads (the branch Leonidas belongs to) and the Eurypontids. Leotychidas, the Eurypontid king, is never mentioned. Like the Persian example above, Leotychidas is one of the characters featured in ''The 300 Spartans''.
* Another important character from ''The 300 Spartans'' that gets AdaptedOut, this time again on the Greek side, is [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demophilus_of_Thespiae Demophilus]], the leader of a contingent of 700 Thespians (more than twice Leonidas' forces) who refused to retreat and died there along with the Spartans. This point is somewhat of a filmic deviation from the ''300'' graphic novel, though, as a small Thespian force appears do appear in it guarding the mountain pass before being butchered.
* Artemisia didn't die during the Battle of Salamis. In fact, she escaped from the battle by attacking the ship of a Persian king under her command who was a personal enemy to her, which tricked the Greeks into letting her sail away in the belief she was deserting from Xerxes' army (fortunately (and fortunately for Artemisia, the ally ship sunk and its entire crew drowned, leaving no one behind to tell Xerxes).Xerxes the truth). Ironically, this would have been perfectly in-character for her portrayal in the film.



* Darius didn't invade Athens because he was "annoyed by Greek freedom" or something, but because Athens and Eretria had supported the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionian_Revolt Ionian Revolt]] in territories of his empire that were formerly Greek colonies, like Aeolis, Cyprus and Caria. There is a grain of truth in the claim, though, as Darius' brother Artaphernes had previously told the Athenians to ditch democracy and reinstate their deposed tyrant Hippias (who was exiled in Darius's court) as a condition for Persian help against Sparta. It was only after hearing this that Athens broke negotiations and participated in the Ionian Revolt as a payback to Persia, which in turn led to Darius and Hippias to start their invasion as a punishment. Persia wasn't opposed to democracy per se; after the Revolt was defeated, Mardonius formally replaced the Ionian tyrants with democracies, probably surmising that there would be less trouble in the long run that way.

to:

* Darius didn't invade Athens because he was "annoyed by Greek freedom" or something, but because Athens and Eretria had supported the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionian_Revolt Ionian Revolt]] in territories of his empire that were formerly Greek colonies, like Aeolis, Cyprus and Caria. There is a grain of truth in the claim, though, as Darius' brother Artaphernes had previously told the Athenians to ditch democracy and reinstate their deposed tyrant Hippias (who was exiled in Darius's court) as a condition for Persian help against Sparta. It was only after hearing this that Athens broke negotiations and participated in the Ionian Revolt as a payback to Persia, which in turn led to Darius and Hippias to start their invasion as a punishment. In general, Persia wasn't opposed to democracy per se; after the Revolt was defeated, Mardonius formally replaced the Ionian tyrants with democracies, probably surmising that there would be less trouble in the long run that way.



* The incident in which the Spartans threw their Persian emissaries into a well did happen, at least according to Herodotus, but not during Xerxes's reign. It happened during his father Darius', and its outcome was hardly limited to Sparta, as Athenians did the same, although they were characteristically delicate enough to judge the messengers before tossing them to the pit (speaking of which, the Spartans realized they had gone a bit overboard, so they sent two of their people to be executed in Persia as a reparation[[note]]Xerxes actually ''refused'' and simply sent the two back to Sparta[[/note]]). As Xerxes knew of these events, he omitted Athens and Sparta when he sent messengers to the Greek cities.
* The Battle of Thermopylae happened during the Carnea just as portrayed in the film, but the Ephors weren't secretly working for Xerxes and had the right priorities, so they allowed Leonidas to send a military expedition. It was Leonidas himself who choose to take only his 300-man ''hippei'' force and a support team of helots. That said, they did forbid him once to do so due to the Carnea, but that was during the Battle of Marathon, not Thermopylae.
** Modern interpretations of primary sources indicate that in either or both cases, this may not have been the whole truth; the Spartan heartland was in the very south of mainland Greece and an army would need to pass through the much more defensible isthmus of Corinth to threaten them. After Thermopylai, it took the Athenians threatening to defect to the Persians (who, by the way, had just ''sacked and destroyed'' Athens) to get the Spartans to turn out for Plataia.

to:

* The incident in which the Spartans threw their Persian emissaries into a well did happen, at least according to Herodotus, but not during Xerxes's reign. It happened during his father Darius', and its outcome was hardly limited to Sparta, as Athenians did the same, although they were characteristically delicate enough to judge the messengers before tossing them to the pit (speaking of which, the Spartans realized they had gone a bit overboard, so they sent two of their people to be executed in Persia as a reparation[[note]]Xerxes reparation).[[note]]Xerxes actually ''refused'' and simply sent the two back to Sparta[[/note]]). Sparta[[/note]] As Xerxes knew of these events, he omitted Athens and Sparta when he sent messengers to the Greek cities.
* The Battle of Thermopylae happened during the Carnea just as portrayed in the film, but the Ephors weren't secretly working for Xerxes and had the right priorities, so they allowed Leonidas to send a military expedition. It was Leonidas himself who choose to take only his 300-man ''hippei'' force and a support team of helots. That said, they They did forbid him once to do so due to the Carnea, but that was during the Battle of Marathon, not Thermopylae.
** Modern
Thermopylae, and modern interpretations of primary sources indicate that in either or both cases, this may not have been the whole truth; the Spartan heartland was in the very south of mainland Greece and an army would need to pass through the much more defensible isthmus of Corinth to threaten them. After Thermopylai, it took the Athenians threatening to defect to the Persians (who, by the way, had just ''sacked and destroyed'' Athens) to get the Spartans to turn out for Plataia.



* The storm that destroys part of the Persian fleet did happen, but it took place in the coast of Magnesia, which crosses into ArtisticLicenseGeography for being just too far to be watched from Thermopylae as in the film. Said fleet had nothing to do with the battle, either, because the Persian army that attacked the pass actually [[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Thermopylae_%26_Artemisium_campaign_map.png came overland]] after crossing Macedon and Thessalia, not from the sea, which was blocked by the Greek navy at Artemisium. In fact, this deviation could be considered a PlotHole between ''300'' and ''Rise of an Empire'': the presence of Persian ships in the Malian gulf would mean Themistocles' defense in Artemisium had been bypassed, but this never happens in the films, as Themistocles only loses his blockade the same day Leonidas and his people are killed.

to:

* The storm that destroys part of the Persian fleet did happen, but it took place in the coast of Magnesia, which crosses into ArtisticLicenseGeography for being just too far to be watched from Thermopylae as in the film. Said fleet had nothing to do with the battle, either, because the Persian army that attacked the pass actually [[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Thermopylae_%26_Artemisium_campaign_map.png came overland]] after crossing Macedon and Thessalia, not from the sea, which was blocked by the Greek navy at Artemisium. In fact, this deviation could be considered constitutes a PlotHole between ''300'' and ''Rise of an Empire'': the presence of Persian ships in the Malian gulf would mean Themistocles' defense in Artemisium had been bypassed, but this never happens in the films, as Themistocles only loses his blockade the same day Leonidas and his people are killed.



* The second day of the Battle of Artemisium saw the Greeks attacking, not defending deep into the strait. Themistocles's tactic of running aground ships sideways to form sea barricades is entirely fictitious.
* The film shows the Greek fleet destroyed in Artemisia's bombing tactics the third day of the battle, and they only avoid a Persian victory because Artemisia's own fleet is affected too by the attack. It is underlined by this way that both Leonidas and Themistocles fail at containing the Persian invasions in their respective terrains. In real life, although suffering hard losses, the Greeks actually held at the straits of Artemisium while Leonidas failed at the Hot Gates. They only retreated when the Thermopylae pass was taken and thus defending the nearby sea became irrelevant. (That said, Themistocles and company did realize the much larger Persian fleet would end up overpowering them by sheer attrition sooner or later, so they were already considering the option of retreating when they heard of Leonidas' defeat.) The Greek fleet then sailed to Athens and helped to evacuate it.
* In the film, Xerxes leaves the Spartan corpses out in the sun to be consumed by the crows, and letting his soldiers see those who defied him to the end. While in line with the historical Xerxes' reputation for rage, this goes against Persian tradition that valiant warriors, regardless of being friend or foe, should be treated with great honor, and thus the Spartans would have been buried by the Persians. The only exception was Leonidas, whose body was ordered to be decapitated and crucified. Herodotus claimed this could have been in response to Xerxes having lost two of his brothers, Abrocomes and Hyperanthes on the third day.
* The film version of Xerxes burns Athens to the ground after his victory at Thermopylae and Artemisium, which is in historical sources, but modern historians greatly theorize that it might have been Greek propaganda, as Xerxes had no reason to destroy a city of significant strategic value ([[LampshadeHanging which is noted by Artemisia herself in the film]]). On the other hand, Herodotus himself claimed that burning the city was the entire objective of the campaign, a punitive action over Athenian's role in the aforementioned Ionian Revolt, which is why Xerxes preferred to withdraw with most of his forces after losing at Salamis (leaving Mardonius to continue the effort) instead of risking himself.

to:

* Ironically, the film's rendition of the Battle of Marathon shows Themistocles at the head of the Athenians absolutely wasting Persians left and right. In real life, the Athenian center was indeed commanded by Themistocles and Aristides, but the troop arrangement planned by their general Miltiades gave them very thin lines, as most of their Greek forces were concentrated on the wings, and as a consequence, the center ended up being driven back and pursued; it was only when the more powerful wings crushed the Persian flanks that the Persian center was pushed back itself and routed. You could still consider Themistocles a badass for ensuring the Athenian center didn't completely collapse, and not any less for coming alive from such a dire situation, though.
* The second day of the Battle of Artemisium saw the Greeks attacking, not defending deep into the strait. Themistocles's tactic of running aground ships sideways to form sea barricades is entirely fictitious.
fictional.
* The film shows the Greek fleet destroyed in Artemisia's bombing tactics the third day of the battle, and they only avoid a Persian victory because Artemisia's own fleet is affected too by the attack. It is underlined by this way that both Leonidas and Themistocles fail at containing the Persian invasions in their respective terrains. In real life, although suffering hard losses, the Greeks actually held at the straits of Artemisium while Leonidas failed at the Hot Gates. They only retreated when the Thermopylae pass was taken and thus defending the nearby sea became irrelevant. (That said, Themistocles and company did realize the much larger Persian fleet would end up overpowering them by sheer attrition sooner or later, so they were already considering the option of retreating retreating, waiting for news from Leonidas, when they heard of Leonidas' the latter's defeat.) The Greek fleet then sailed to Athens and helped to evacuate it.
* In the film, Xerxes leaves the Spartan corpses out in the sun to be consumed by the crows, and letting his soldiers see those who defied him to the end. While in line with the historical Xerxes' reputation for rage, this goes against Persian tradition that valiant warriors, regardless of being friend or foe, should be treated with great honor, and thus the Spartans would have been buried by the Persians. The only exception was Leonidas, whose body was ordered to be decapitated and crucified. Herodotus claimed this could have been in response to Xerxes having lost two of his brothers, Abrocomes and Hyperanthes Hyperanthes, on the third day.
* The film version of Xerxes burns Athens to the ground after his victory at Thermopylae and Artemisium, which is in historical sources, but modern historians greatly theorize that it might have been Greek propaganda, as Xerxes had no reason to destroy a city of significant strategic value ([[LampshadeHanging which is noted by Artemisia herself in the film]]). On the other hand, Herodotus himself claimed that burning the city was the entire objective of the campaign, a punitive action over Athenian's role in the aforementioned Ionian Revolt, which is why Xerxes preferred to withdraw with most of his forces after losing at Salamis (leaving Mardonius to continue the effort) instead of risking himself.his own skin.

Added: 196

Changed: 4

Removed: 1500

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That's just weird. If it's not an example then it's not an example.


* The Persian army has what seem to be Chinese gunpowder grenadiers, but the Achaemenid Empire didn't extend anywhere near China and gunpowder wasn't invented for more than a thousand years hence.
%%* The Persian army has sub-Saharan tribes and what seem to be Chinese gunpowder grenadiers, but none of those regions was a part of the Achaemenid Empire. The Africans might actually be a clever GeniusBonus, though, as at the time the Greeks were simultaneously in another war with the African-Phoenician power of Carthage, who ''did'' reach sub-Saharan Africa through the travels of their navigators and merchants, and a [[EnemyMine possible secret alliance between Carthaginians and Persians]] has been discussed through the years. However, it would not be any less of an artistic license in case of being so, because Carthage operated mainly in Berber Africa and probably had few to no sub-Saharans on its payroll. (Portraying Carthaginians as having plenty of black men among them is an error that many, many other historical productions commit as well.)%%The Achaemenid Empire had contacts with Kush and Herodotus claims that "Ethiopians who dwell above Egypt" (i.e. south of it) participated in Xerxes' invasion of Greece. There is also Greek art showing what appear to be sub-Saharan Africans in Iranian tunics and trousers, the so-called "Negro Alabastrons." The extent to which Ethiopians really did participate in the Persian military isn't clear but it's not without historical basis either.



* The film's treatment of Greek military tactics is inconsistent at the best and fantastical most of the time. The portrayed Spartans occasionally do execute their historical [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx phalanx formation]], most notably at the first moments of the battle, when pushing the Persians off the cliff, or when extracting the maddened Artemis from the battlefield. However, barring these instances, they usually break formation completely and engage their opponents in stylized individual duels with yards of space between each other. In real life, phalangic teamwork was not only the Greeks' main strength at Thermopylae (aside from the [[GeoEffects natural terrain]]), but also one of the lead factors of their victory in the Greco-Persian Wars. Had they chosen to fight the way it is choreographed, the Battle of Thermopylae would have lasted a single day and [[TheBadGuyWins guess who would have won]].

to:

* The film's treatment of Greek military tactics is inconsistent at the best and fantastical most of the time. The portrayed Spartans occasionally do execute their historical [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx phalanx formation]], most notably at the first moments of the battle, when pushing the Persians off the cliff, or when extracting the maddened Artemis from the battlefield. However, barring these instances, they usually break formation completely and engage their opponents in stylized individual duels with yards of space between each other. In real life, phalangic teamwork was not only the Greeks' main strength at Thermopylae (aside from the [[GeoEffects natural terrain]]), but also one of the lead factors of their victory in the Greco-Persian Wars. Had they chosen to fight the way it is choreographed, the Battle of Thermopylae would have lasted a single day and [[TheBadGuyWins guess who would have won]].


Added DiffLines:

* The Persian army has what seem to be Chinese gunpowder grenadiers, but the Achaemenid Empire didn't extend anywhere near China and gunpowder wasn't invented for more than a thousand years hence.

Added: 1304

Changed: 3174

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The idea that slavery was illegal in the Persian empire, even if only "officially," is an old myth. In fact, most of this paragraph sounds like misinformation.


* Leaving aside the debate about whether Xerxes was a tyrant, the films' contrast between the "freedom-loving" Greece and the "proslavery" Persia is an unrealistic coup of BlackAndWhiteMorality. In reality, both countries supported and allowed for slavery in one form or another, just like every other nation in the world at the time, so that specifical topic was the least of the Greeks's moral worries. If anything, the ''Persians'' were probably the most freedom-loving of the two, as official slavery was forbidden in the Achaemenid Empire (except for war prisoners) and their governors generally disliked the very concept (there's a reason Xerxes' ancestor Cyrus the Great is revered in UsefulNotes/{{Judaism}}: he freed its people from the much more shackle-happy Babylonians). That said, all Persian subjects were formally called "slaves" of the king (''bandaka'') and the latter had over them several of the rights a Greek master had over his slaves, including the right to take their very lives at will, so the Greeks's impression that they were fighting a slavemaster emperor wasn't completely baseless, only exacerbated by cultural confusion. The fact that the Persian troops were apparently driven to battle by officers cracking whips probably only worsened the Greeks's already paranoid views on their empire.
* As listed in the Characters entry below, the Achaemenid Empire was one of the first religiously tolerant societies that stuck for centuries. The god-like characterization of Xerxes is entirely inaccurate as such belief would be blasphemous to UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}}, his personal belief. The King and the ethnic Persians venerated Ahura Mazda and the other subjects whatever divinity they liked, which was another reason why Hebrews quite liked the Persian Empire, who liberated them from the clutches of the Babylonians in the process of conquering Babylon itself.

to:

* Leaving aside the debate about whether Xerxes was a tyrant, the films' contrast between the "freedom-loving" Greece and the "proslavery" Persia is an unrealistic coup of BlackAndWhiteMorality. In reality, both countries supported and allowed for slavery in one form or another, just like every other nation in the world at the time, so that specifical topic the propagation of slavery per se was not among the least of the Greeks's moral Greeks' worries. If anything, Those who fought against the ''Persians'' were probably empire had the most freedom-loving worry that they would be enslaved if they lost, but this again was common practice in Greece, Persia and everywhere else. The undemocratic feudal nature of the two, as official slavery was forbidden Persian state, the high concentration of power in the Achaemenid Empire (except for war prisoners) monarch, and their governors generally disliked the very concept (there's a reason Xerxes' ancestor Cyrus description of his subjects as ''bandaka'' ("bonded") may have given the Great is revered in UsefulNotes/{{Judaism}}: he freed its people from Greeks the much more shackle-happy Babylonians). That said, impression that all Persian subjects were formally called "slaves" nominally[[note]]Thus ''bandaka'' was translated ''doulos'', "slave."[[/note]] and substantially slaves of the king (''bandaka'') and the latter had over them several king. The claims of the rights a some Greek master had over his slaves, including the right to take their very lives at will, so the Greeks's impression writers that they were fighting a slavemaster emperor wasn't completely baseless, only exacerbated by cultural confusion. The fact that the Persian imperial troops were apparently driven to battle by officers cracking whips probably only worsened the Greeks's already paranoid views on their empire.
* As listed in the Characters entry below, the Achaemenid Empire was one of the first religiously tolerant societies that stuck for centuries. The god-like characterization of Xerxes is entirely inaccurate inaccurate, as such a belief would be blasphemous to in UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}}, his personal belief. The religion. Achaemenid kings were known to present themselves as gods in Egypt, where that was the correct thing to do, or as pious devotees of other peoples' gods, as in the Cyrus Cylinder of Babylon--essentially, whatever was best for PR--but among themselves the King and the ethnic Persians venerated Ahura Mazda and the other subjects whatever divinity they liked, which liked. This was another reason why Hebrews quite liked the Persian Empire, who which liberated them from the clutches of the Babylonians in the process of conquering Babylon itself.



* Sparta was run by two hereditary kings who held equal power and were in turn judged by the Ephors. There were two royal families descended by the twin brothers Evrysthenes and Proklis, who were the leaders of the Dorians, a Greek tribe, who had invaded Sparta some 600 years before the Persian wars. Going to just one of them is pointless, and even if he did accede, he'd probably be branded a traitor and thrown out of the city immediately.
* In the scene after Leonidas was born, the film shows an elder examining him on a clifftop while the narrator states that he would have been discarded if he was "small, or puny, or sickly", and then pans to the bottom and shows a number of baby bones. While Ancient Sparta did commit eugenic infanticide, they tested the baby by bathing him in wine and exposing him to the elements on a mountain, and babies that failed the test would be left to die there rather than being thrown off a cliff. Some children didn't even die, and instead were adopted by and raised as Helots.

to:

* Sparta was run by two hereditary kings who held equal power and were in turn judged by the Ephors. There were two royal families descended by the twin brothers Evrysthenes and Proklis, who were the leaders of the Dorians, a Greek tribe, who had invaded Sparta some 600 years before the Persian wars.Graeco-Persian Wars. Going to just one of them is pointless, and even if he did accede, he'd probably be branded a traitor and thrown out of the city immediately.
* In the scene after Leonidas was born, the film shows an elder examining him on a clifftop while the narrator states that he would have been discarded if he was "small, or puny, or sickly", and then pans to the bottom and shows a number of baby bones. While Ancient Sparta did commit eugenic infanticide, they tested the baby by bathing him in wine and exposing him to the elements on a mountain, and babies that failed the test would be left to die there rather than being thrown off a cliff. Some children didn't even die, and instead were adopted by and raised as Helots.helots.



* The fact that a Spartan used "boy lover" as an insult against an Athenian (as in the first film) or vice versa (as in the second) would be ironic at least, as both cities were solidly into the Greek concept of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece boy love]]. The main difference is that Spartans apparently saw it in a more spiritual light (according to Xenophon, they believed that relationships between men and boys should be based in love and friendship, not only in physical attraction or political interest) while Athenians considered it an educational and political tool (they enforced the "erastes" and "eromenos", a homoerotic form of StudentAndMasterTeam). However, sources like Plutarch and Aelian state young male lovers were legal in Sparta regardless of the city's opinion about it, and it is even believed that Sparta was actually one of the first cities to formalize this, so it is kind of a moot point.
* The second film features a [[BloodOnTheDebateFloor fistfight in midst of the Athenian senate]], something that would have been disgraceful to both parties in real life and not casually dismissed as in the film.
* The Persian army has sub-Saharan tribes and what seem to be Chinese gunpowder grenadiers, but none of those regions was a part of the Achaemenid Empire. The Africans might actually be a clever GeniusBonus, though, as at the time the Greeks were simultaneously in another war with the African-Phoenician power of Carthage, who ''did'' reach sub-Saharan Africa through the travels of their navigators and merchants, and a [[EnemyMine possible secret alliance between Carthaginians and Persians]] has been discussed through the years. However, it would not be any less of an artistic license in case of being so, because Carthage operated mainly in Berber Africa and probably had few to no sub-Saharans on its payroll. (Portraying Carthaginians as having plenty of black men among them is an error that many, many other historical productions commit as well.)

to:

* The fact that a Spartan used "boy lover" "boy-lover" as an insult against an Athenian (as in the first film) or vice versa (as in the second) would be ironic at least, as both cities were solidly into the Greek concept of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece boy love]]. The main difference is that Spartans apparently saw it in a more spiritual light (according to Xenophon, they believed that relationships between men and boys should be based in on love and friendship, not only in on physical attraction or political interest) while Athenians considered it an educational and political tool (they enforced the "erastes" ''erastes'' and "eromenos", ''eromenos'', a homoerotic form of StudentAndMasterTeam). However, sources like Plutarch and Aelian state young male lovers were legal in Sparta regardless of the city's opinion about it, and it is even believed that Sparta was actually one of the first cities to formalize this, so it is kind of a moot point.
* The second film features a [[BloodOnTheDebateFloor fistfight in midst of the Athenian senate]], assembly]], something that would have been disgraceful to both parties in real life and not casually dismissed as in the film.
* The Persian army has what seem to be Chinese gunpowder grenadiers, but the Achaemenid Empire didn't extend anywhere near China and gunpowder wasn't invented for more than a thousand years hence.
%%*
The Persian army has sub-Saharan tribes and what seem to be Chinese gunpowder grenadiers, but none of those regions was a part of the Achaemenid Empire. The Africans might actually be a clever GeniusBonus, though, as at the time the Greeks were simultaneously in another war with the African-Phoenician power of Carthage, who ''did'' reach sub-Saharan Africa through the travels of their navigators and merchants, and a [[EnemyMine possible secret alliance between Carthaginians and Persians]] has been discussed through the years. However, it would not be any less of an artistic license in case of being so, because Carthage operated mainly in Berber Africa and probably had few to no sub-Saharans on its payroll. (Portraying Carthaginians as having plenty of black men among them is an error that many, many other historical productions commit as well.))%%The Achaemenid Empire had contacts with Kush and Herodotus claims that "Ethiopians who dwell above Egypt" (i.e. south of it) participated in Xerxes' invasion of Greece. There is also Greek art showing what appear to be sub-Saharan Africans in Iranian tunics and trousers, the so-called "Negro Alabastrons." The extent to which Ethiopians really did participate in the Persian military isn't clear but it's not without historical basis either.



* The film's treatment of Greek military tactics is inconsistent at the best and fantastic most of the time. The portrayed Spartans occasionally do execute their historical [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx phalanx formation]], most notably at the first moments of the battle, when pushing the Persians off the cliff, or when extracting the maddened Artemis from the battlefield. However, barring these instances, they usually break formation completely and engage their opponents in stylized individual duels with yards of space between each other. In real life, phalangic teamwork was not only the Greeks' main strength in Thermopylae (aside from the [[GeoEffects natural terrain]]), but also one of the lead factors of their victory at the Greco-Persian Wars. Had they chosen to fight the way it is choreographed, the Battle of Thermopylae would have lasted a single day and [[TheBadGuyWins guess who would have won]].
* Gerard Butler, Sullivan Stapleton and company fight in leather underwear, while the historical Greeks didn't step on the battlefield without several kilograms of bronze body armor. This is actually AdaptationalModesty from the comic book, where the Spartans occasionally fight completely naked except for their cape and helmet. Miller took this from Greco-Roman art, where gods and heroes were often depicted nude to symbolize their inherent power, beauty and badassery.

to:

* The film's treatment of Greek military tactics is inconsistent at the best and fantastic fantastical most of the time. The portrayed Spartans occasionally do execute their historical [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx phalanx formation]], most notably at the first moments of the battle, when pushing the Persians off the cliff, or when extracting the maddened Artemis from the battlefield. However, barring these instances, they usually break formation completely and engage their opponents in stylized individual duels with yards of space between each other. In real life, phalangic teamwork was not only the Greeks' main strength in at Thermopylae (aside from the [[GeoEffects natural terrain]]), but also one of the lead factors of their victory at in the Greco-Persian Wars. Had they chosen to fight the way it is choreographed, the Battle of Thermopylae would have lasted a single day and [[TheBadGuyWins guess who would have won]].
* Gerard Butler, Sullivan Stapleton and company fight in leather underwear, while the historical Greeks didn't step on the battlefield without several kilograms of bronze body armor. This is actually AdaptationalModesty from the comic book, where the Spartans occasionally fight completely naked except for their cape and helmet. Miller took this from Greco-Roman art, where gods and heroes were often depicted nude to symbolize their inherent power, beauty and badassery. Greek art occasionally shows hoplites fighting naked or even in only armor (which would chafe mightily), but this was probably artistic license even at the time; normally they are shown in tunics.



* While the historical Spartan soldiers did have their reasons to be derisive towards the rest of the Greek armies (most of them were neither professional nor as disciplined as theirs) the films give the impression that they were the only Greek nation skilled at frontal war: out of the rest, the Arcadians are lightly armed skirmishers only good for ambushes, while the Athenian soldiers are tough but decidedly inferior to their Spartan homologues. Actually, most Hellenic nations were capable to form competent phalanges, and some of them, like Thebes and Macedon, were or became ''better'' at it than Sparta. In fact, Leonidas was happy to trust the front lines to their many allies at Thermopylae in a rotating movement, as by doing so they avoided attrition and he allowed for some rest for his own troops.
* The Spartans are shown fighting with a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcata falcata]]-like sword probably meant to be the historical Greek [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopis kopis]]. In real life, Greek soldiers used a small, straight sword called [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiphos xiphos]], which was more useful behind a shield wall than a curved saber, and Spartans were notable for using xiphos ''smaller'' than other Greeks for increased practicality.

to:

* While the historical Spartan soldiers did have their reasons to be derisive towards the rest of the Greek armies (most of them were neither professional nor as disciplined as theirs) the films give the impression that they were the only Greek nation skilled at frontal war: out of the rest, the Arcadians are lightly armed lightly-armed skirmishers only good for ambushes, while the Athenian soldiers are tough but decidedly inferior to their Spartan homologues. Actually, most Hellenic nations were capable to form of forming competent phalanges, and some of them, like Thebes and Macedon, were or became ''better'' at it than Sparta. In fact, Leonidas was happy to trust the front lines to their many allies at Thermopylae in a rotating movement, as by doing so they avoided attrition and he allowed for some rest for his own troops.
* The Spartans are shown fighting with a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcata falcata]]-like sword probably meant to be the historical Greek [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopis kopis]]. In real life, Greek soldiers more often used a small, straight sword called [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiphos xiphos]], which was more useful behind a shield wall than a curved saber, and Spartans were notable for using xiphos xiphoi ''smaller'' than other Greeks for increased practicality.



* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspis aspis]] shield was not a single piece of bronze as portrayed in the film. It was composed of a ''wooden'' base merely coated in metal. Ironically, the Athenian aspis from the sequel are surely shown to be made of wood, only without the metal coating.

to:

* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspis aspis]] shield was not a single piece of bronze as portrayed in the film. It was composed of a ''wooden'' base merely coated in metal. with only a thin bronze, fabric or hide facing. Ironically, the Athenian aspis aspides from the sequel are surely shown to be made of wood, only without the metal coating.



* The films portray the Greek ships as smaller and more maneuverable than their Persian equivalents, which is exactly the opposite of the real thing: the Greeks ships were big, cumbersome and manned by unexperienced sailors, so they typically put their trust more in their ship-borne hoplite marines to board and capture the enemy ships than in any inherent sailing advantage.

to:

* The films portray the Greek ships as smaller and more maneuverable than their Persian equivalents, which is exactly the opposite of the real thing: situation: the Greeks ships were big, cumbersome and manned by unexperienced sailors, so they typically put their trust more in their ship-borne hoplite marines to board and capture the enemy ships than in any inherent sailing advantage.



* The Immortals weren't disfigured masked men who dressed in black and fought with dual sabers. According to historians, they were just better armored versions of the regular ''sparabara'' infantry, that is, dudes wielding wicker shields and spears (among other many weapons) and clad in the Persian empire's clear colors. Sources don't mention any mask, although they might have worn a Persian tiara that covered their faces. (This point is less blatant in the graphic novel, where the Immortals at least wield shields and spears.)
* The Athenians running into Marathon in a barbarian style open field charge is just as jarring as the Spartans dueling freely in the Thermopylae. In real life, they did charge in a sort of previously unseen move in order for their slow-moving phalanx to not be picked apart by Persian archers, but it was a tight, controlled march in formation and not a wild individual race. As a result, the heavy phalanx-based Athenian hoplites overpowered the light Persian infantry and provided no room for the Persian cavalry to maneuver on the crowded beach. Had the actual battle been fought like the one in the movie, the Athenian forces would have likely been swarmed and obliterated by the defenders. (It's somewhat justified by the narration saying that Themistocles has the Greeks charge while the Persians are still unloading their troops, leaving them without their horses and without a lot of their troops being able to get off.)
* In the film version of the Battle of Artemisium, the Athenian fleet executes an interesting-looking wheel formation to cut with their agile prows any frontal enemy advance. Considering that Greeks ships were actually the least experienced and maneuverable ones in real life, this tactic would have probably been suicidally complex for them to attempt, and would have only got them tangled and turned into easy targets for the expert Persian navy. Herodotus describes the Greek formation as a side-to-side crescent or circle, not a wheel, and they apparently broke it quickly in order to charge. The Greek defense was not as wickedly efficient as shown in the film, either; even although they did repel the Persians for the duration of the battle, the Greeks got technically the shorter end of the stick because the losses were happening in even numbers despite the vastly different sizes of their armies (the Persian navy was so numerically superior that it could afford much more losses than the small Greek fleet).

to:

* The Immortals weren't disfigured masked men who dressed in black and fought with dual sabers. According to historians, they were just better armored better-armored versions of the regular ''sparabara'' infantry, that is, dudes wielding wicker shields and spears (among other many weapons) and clad in the Persian empire's clear colors. Sources don't mention any mask, although they might have worn a Persian tiara that covered the long earflaps of their faces.felt tiaras could be wrapped around the lower face. (This point is less blatant in the graphic novel, where the Immortals at least wield shields and spears.)
* The Athenians running into Marathon in a barbarian style barbarian-style open field charge is just as jarring as the Spartans dueling freely in the Thermopylae. In real life, they did charge in a sort of previously unseen previously-unseen move in order for their slow-moving phalanx to not be picked apart by Persian archers, but it was a tight, controlled march in formation and not a wild individual race. As a result, the heavy phalanx-based Athenian hoplites overpowered the light Persian infantry and provided no room for the Persian cavalry to maneuver on the crowded beach. Had the actual battle been fought like the one in the movie, the Athenian forces would have likely been swarmed and obliterated by the defenders. (It's somewhat justified by the narration saying that Themistocles has the Greeks charge while the Persians are still unloading their troops, leaving them without their horses and without a lot of their troops being able to get off.)
* In the film version of the Battle of Artemisium, the Athenian fleet executes an interesting-looking wheel formation to cut with their agile prows any frontal enemy advance. Considering that Greeks ships were actually the least experienced and maneuverable ones in real life, this tactic would have probably been suicidally complex for them to attempt, and would have only got them tangled and turned into easy targets for the expert Persian navy.navy (which was crewed by maritime peoples like the Phoenicians). Herodotus describes the Greek formation as a side-to-side crescent or circle, not a wheel, and they apparently broke it quickly in order to charge. The Greek defense was not as wickedly efficient as shown in the film, either; even although they did repel the Persians for the duration of the battle, the Greeks got technically the shorter end of the stick because the losses were happening in even numbers despite the vastly different sizes of their armies (the Persian navy was so numerically superior that it could afford much more losses than the small Greek fleet).



* Gorgo's role is amped up in both films, particularly in the second, where she leads personally the Spartan fleet. Historical examples of Greek women assisting in wars do exist, like [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydna Hydna]], who helped to sabotage the Persian fleet before Artemisium, but most Greeks didn't like females getting directly involved with warfare. They even offered a prize of 10,000 drachmas for Artemisia's capture only because she was a woman general.

to:

* Gorgo's role is amped up in both films, particularly in the second, where she leads personally leads the Spartan fleet. Historical examples of Greek women assisting in wars do exist, like [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydna Hydna]], who helped to sabotage the Persian fleet before Artemisium, but most Greeks didn't like females getting directly involved with warfare. They even offered a prize of 10,000 drachmas for Artemisia's capture only because she was a woman general.



* Although the legendary tragedian [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeschylus Aeschylus]] did serve under Themistocles, he wasn't his second-in-command or anything more than a mere soldier. Him saving Themistocles's life in Artemisium is funny too, as Artemisium was the only major battle of the conflict Aeschylus didn't fight in (he was present in Marathon, Salamis and even Plataea, but not Artemisium, or at least he never mentioned it among his battle exploits).

to:

* Although the legendary tragedian [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeschylus Aeschylus]] did serve under Themistocles, he wasn't his second-in-command or anything more than a mere soldier. Him saving Themistocles's life in at Artemisium is funny too, as Artemisium was the only major battle of the conflict Aeschylus didn't fight in (he was present in at Marathon, Salamis and even Plataea, but not Artemisium, or at least he never mentioned it among his battle exploits).



* The real Xerxes was a [[UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}} Zoroastrian]], meaning that he would have considered the idea of declaring himself god-king blasphemy. Similarly, his court of magi and priests being ordered to "turn him into a god" would have been even more shocked, if not downright offended at the request. The idea of Xerxes being a god was actually born of a misunderstanding of the process of ''[[KneelBeforeZod proskynesis]]'', which the Greeks viewed as only being acceptable for a deity. In other words, the Persians didn't treat their ruler as a god, but the Greeks ''thought'' they did.

to:

* The As noted, the real Xerxes was a [[UsefulNotes/{{Zoroastrianism}} Zoroastrian]], meaning that he would have considered the idea of declaring himself god-king blasphemy. Similarly, his court of magi and priests being ordered to "turn him into a god" would have been even more shocked, if not downright offended at the request. The idea of Xerxes being a god was actually born of a misunderstanding of the process of ''[[KneelBeforeZod proskynesis]]'', which the Greeks viewed as only being acceptable for a deity. In other words, the Persians didn't treat their ruler as a god, but the Greeks ''thought'' they did.



* [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemisia_I_of_Caria Artemisia]] wasn't a warrior brought up from slavery, but the queen of the Greek-Persian colony of Halicarnassus. Also, while she really served at Artemisium and Salamis and was in charge of a relatively huge part of the Persian fleet (the forces of Cos, Nysiros, Calyndos and her own personal ships), she was not the fleet's supreme commander: she shared command with Xerxes's younger brothers, Achaemenes and Ariabignes.

to:

* [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemisia_I_of_Caria Artemisia]] wasn't a warrior brought up from slavery, but the queen of the Greek-Persian colony of Halicarnassus. Halicarnassus, a Greek city in western Turkey under Persian rule. Also, while she really served at Artemisium and Salamis and was in charge of a relatively huge large part of the Persian fleet (the forces of Cos, Nysiros, Calyndos and her own personal ships), she was not the fleet's supreme commander: she shared command with Xerxes's younger brothers, Achaemenes and Ariabignes.



** Likewise, historical Sparta was ruled by a complex system which has been streamlined in the movies. The movie portrays Leonidas as the single ruler of the city, while Sparta was actually co-ruled by ''two'' kings from two parallel dynasties, the Agiads (the branch Leonidas belongs to) and the Eurypontids. Leotychidas, the Eurypontid king, is never mentionned. Like the Persian example above, Leotychidas is one of the characters featured in ''The 300 Spartans''.
* Another important character from ''The 300 Spartans'' that gets AdaptedOut, this time on the Greek side, is [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demophilus_of_Thespiae Demophilus]], the leader of a contingent of 700 Thespians (more than twice than Leonidas's forces) who refused to retreat and died there along with the Spartans. This point is somewhat of a filmic deviation from the ''300'' graphic novel, though, as a small Thespian force appears in it guarding the mountain pass before being butchered.
* Artemisia of Caria didn't die during the Battle of Salamis. In fact, she escaped from the battle by attacking the ship of a Persian king under her command who was a personal enemy to her, which tricked the Greeks into letting her sail away in the belief she was deserting from Xerxes's army (fortunately for Artemisia, the ally ship sunk and its entire crew drowned, leaving no one behind to tell Xerxes). Ironically, this would have been perfectly in-character for her portrayal in the film.

to:

** Likewise, historical Sparta was ruled by a complex system which has been streamlined in the movies. The movie portrays Leonidas as the single ruler of the city, while Sparta was actually co-ruled by ''two'' kings from two parallel dynasties, the Agiads (the branch Leonidas belongs to) and the Eurypontids. Leotychidas, the Eurypontid king, is never mentionned.mentioned. Like the Persian example above, Leotychidas is one of the characters featured in ''The 300 Spartans''.
* Another important character from ''The 300 Spartans'' that gets AdaptedOut, this time on the Greek side, is [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demophilus_of_Thespiae Demophilus]], the leader of a contingent of 700 Thespians (more than twice than Leonidas's Leonidas' forces) who refused to retreat and died there along with the Spartans. This point is somewhat of a filmic deviation from the ''300'' graphic novel, though, as a small Thespian force appears in it guarding the mountain pass before being butchered.
* Artemisia of Caria didn't die during the Battle of Salamis. In fact, she escaped from the battle by attacking the ship of a Persian king under her command who was a personal enemy to her, which tricked the Greeks into letting her sail away in the belief she was deserting from Xerxes's Xerxes' army (fortunately for Artemisia, the ally ship sunk and its entire crew drowned, leaving no one behind to tell Xerxes). Ironically, this would have been perfectly in-character for her portrayal in the film.
film.



* Darius didn't invade Athens because he was "annoyed by Greek freedom" or something, but because Athens and Eretria had supported a revolution (the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionian_Revolt Ionian Revolt]]) in territories of his empire that were formerly Greek colonies, like Aeolis, Cyprus and Caria. There is a grain of truth in the claim, though, as Darius's brother Artaphernes had previously told the Athenians to ditch democracy and reinstate their deposed tyrant Hippias (who was exiled in Darius's court) as a condition for Persian help against Sparta. It was only after hearing this that Athens broke negotiations and participated in the Ionian Revolt as a payback to Persia, which in turn led to Darius and Hippias to start their invasion as a punishment.

to:

* Darius didn't invade Athens because he was "annoyed by Greek freedom" or something, but because Athens and Eretria had supported a revolution (the the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionian_Revolt Ionian Revolt]]) Revolt]] in territories of his empire that were formerly Greek colonies, like Aeolis, Cyprus and Caria. There is a grain of truth in the claim, though, as Darius's Darius' brother Artaphernes had previously told the Athenians to ditch democracy and reinstate their deposed tyrant Hippias (who was exiled in Darius's court) as a condition for Persian help against Sparta. It was only after hearing this that Athens broke negotiations and participated in the Ionian Revolt as a payback to Persia, which in turn led to Darius and Hippias to start their invasion as a punishment. Persia wasn't opposed to democracy per se; after the Revolt was defeated, Mardonius formally replaced the Ionian tyrants with democracies, probably surmising that there would be less trouble in the long run that way.



* The incident in which the Spartans threw their Persian emissaries to a well did happen, at least according to Herodotus, but not during Xerxes's reign. It happened during his father Darius's, and its outcome was hardly limited to Sparta, as Athenians did the same, although they were characteristically delicate enough to judge the messengers before tossing them to the pit (speaking of which, the Spartans realized they had gone a bit overboard, so they sent two of their people to be executed in Persia as a reparation[[note]]Xerxes actually *refused* and simply sent the two back to Sparta[[/note]]). As Xerxes knew these events, he omitted Athens and Sparta when he sent messengers to the Greek cities.
* The Battle of Thermopylae happened during the Carnea just as portrayed in the film, but the Ephors weren't secretly working for Xerxes and had the right priorities, so they allowed Leonidas to send a military expedition; it was Leonidas himself who choose to take only his 300-man ''hippei'' force and a support team of helots. That said, they did forbid him once to do so due to the Carnea, although it happened during the Battle of Marathon, not Thermopylae.
** Modern interpretations of primary sources indicate that in either or both cases, this may not have been the whole truth; the Spartan heartland was in the very south of mainland Greece and an army would need to pass through the much more defensible isthmus of Corinth to threaten them. After Thermopylai, it took the Athenians threatening to defect to the Persians (who, by the way, had just *sacked and destroyed* Athens) to get the Spartans to turn out for Plataia.

to:

* The incident in which the Spartans threw their Persian emissaries to into a well did happen, at least according to Herodotus, but not during Xerxes's reign. It happened during his father Darius's, Darius', and its outcome was hardly limited to Sparta, as Athenians did the same, although they were characteristically delicate enough to judge the messengers before tossing them to the pit (speaking of which, the Spartans realized they had gone a bit overboard, so they sent two of their people to be executed in Persia as a reparation[[note]]Xerxes actually *refused* ''refused'' and simply sent the two back to Sparta[[/note]]). As Xerxes knew of these events, he omitted Athens and Sparta when he sent messengers to the Greek cities.
* The Battle of Thermopylae happened during the Carnea just as portrayed in the film, but the Ephors weren't secretly working for Xerxes and had the right priorities, so they allowed Leonidas to send a military expedition; it expedition. It was Leonidas himself who choose to take only his 300-man ''hippei'' force and a support team of helots. That said, they did forbid him once to do so due to the Carnea, although it happened but that was during the Battle of Marathon, not Thermopylae.
** Modern interpretations of primary sources indicate that in either or both cases, this may not have been the whole truth; the Spartan heartland was in the very south of mainland Greece and an army would need to pass through the much more defensible isthmus of Corinth to threaten them. After Thermopylai, it took the Athenians threatening to defect to the Persians (who, by the way, had just *sacked ''sacked and destroyed* destroyed'' Athens) to get the Spartans to turn out for Plataia.



* The storm that destroys part of the Persian fleet did happen, but it took place in the coast of Magnesia, which crosses into ArtisticLicenseGeography for being just too far to be watched from Thermopylae as in the film. Said fleet had nothing to do with the battle, either, because the Persian army that attacked the pass actually [[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Thermopylae_%26_Artemisium_campaign_map.png came from land]] after crossing Macedon and Thessalia, not from the sea, which was blocked by the Greek navy in Artemisium. In fact, this deviation could be considered a PlotHole between ''300'' and ''Rise of an Empire'': the presence of Persian ships in the Malian gulf would mean Themistocles's defense in Artemisium had been bypassed, but this never happens in the films, as Themistocles only loses his blockade the same day Leonidas and his people are killed.
* The only forces depicted for Greece at the films' Thermopylae are the 300 Spartan hoplites, an Arcadian skirmisher contingent that contributes for a small part of the battle, and some Phocian forces that are referred to but never shown. In reality, the battle featured over 4000 troops on the Greek side (according to Herodotus, which is almost surely a lower estimate). Aside from Leonidas and his 300 ''hippei'', their army included large masses of Mycenaeans, Corinthians, Thespians and people from around Thermopylae. To be fair, several of those peoples are mentioned to have joined Leonidas and company in the graphic novel, but only the Thespians are ever shown on page.
* Surprisingly to some, the now famous "then we will fight in the shade" line is real, though the Spartan soldier that said it was named [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dienekes Dienekes]] instead of Stelios. Also, he wasn't replying to a Persian emissary, but joking with an allied explorer from Trachis. This was Herodotus's version, at least; according to Plutarch, it was Leonidas himself who said the line when one of the soldiers became upset at the sheer number of Persian arrows.
* For what we know, Xerxes and Leonidas never had a face-to-face talk; most of Xerxes's lines from said scenes are recorded by Herodotus as coming from a simple Persian messenger. Similarly, Themistocles and Artemisia never met each other on the battlefield, although they could have possibly met in Artaxerxes I's court after Themistocles and his family were exiled from Greece.
* Leonidas's LastStand happened historically, but under different circumstances. He didn't sacrifice himself to inspire the rest of Greek states to mobilize to war like in the film, as they were all already fighting along with him and thus there was no need of any inspirational immolation. Instead, when Leonidas realized the Persians would flank them thanks to Ephialtes, he ordered the other city-states' armies to retreat while his own forces and Demophilus's (along with an extra Theban contingent that wanted to surrender) remained behind to give them more time to escape. The trope played there, thus, wasn't a ThanatosGambit, but a YouShallNotPass. However, it's recorded in sources that the Oracle of Delphi told the Spartans their king's death would be necessary to win the war, so it's possible that Leonidas decided to offer his life at least partially out of religious fervor.
* There were actually two Spartan survivors of the 300: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristodemus_of_Sparta Aristodemus]] and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantites Pantites]]. The former had an eye infection and was sent home along with another soldier suffering the same illness, Eurytus, while the latter was on an embassy to Thessaly and did not return in time for battle. Both were disgraced upon their return to Sparta, Aristodemus because Eurytus decided to return and fight despite his own blindness (he went to battle guided by a Helot) and Pantites because he didn't hurry up enough. Aristodemus regained some degree of honor by dying in the Battle of Plataea in a berserk charge, while Pantites preferred to hang himself. Nothing of this happens in the film, where the only survivor is Dilios; he could be considered a CompositeCharacter of Aristodemus and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pausanias_(general) Pausanias]], Leonidas's nephew and leader of the Greek forces in Plataea.

to:

* The storm that destroys part of the Persian fleet did happen, but it took place in the coast of Magnesia, which crosses into ArtisticLicenseGeography for being just too far to be watched from Thermopylae as in the film. Said fleet had nothing to do with the battle, either, because the Persian army that attacked the pass actually [[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Thermopylae_%26_Artemisium_campaign_map.png came from land]] overland]] after crossing Macedon and Thessalia, not from the sea, which was blocked by the Greek navy in at Artemisium. In fact, this deviation could be considered a PlotHole between ''300'' and ''Rise of an Empire'': the presence of Persian ships in the Malian gulf would mean Themistocles's Themistocles' defense in Artemisium had been bypassed, but this never happens in the films, as Themistocles only loses his blockade the same day Leonidas and his people are killed.
* The only forces depicted for Greece at the films' Thermopylae are the 300 Spartan hoplites, an Arcadian skirmisher contingent that contributes for a small part of the battle, and some Phocian forces that are referred to but never shown. In reality, the battle featured over 4000 4,000 troops on the Greek side (according to Herodotus, which is almost surely a lower estimate). Aside from Leonidas and his 300 ''hippei'', their army included large masses of Mycenaeans, Corinthians, Thespians and people from around Thermopylae. To be fair, several of those peoples are mentioned to have joined Leonidas and company in the graphic novel, but only the Thespians are ever shown on page.
on-page.
* Surprisingly to some, the now famous "then we will fight in the shade" line is real, though the Spartan soldier that said it was named [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dienekes Dienekes]] instead of Stelios. Also, he wasn't replying to a Persian emissary, but joking with an allied explorer from Trachis. This was Herodotus's Herodotus' version, at least; according to Plutarch, it was Leonidas himself who said the line when one of the soldiers became upset at the sheer number of Persian arrows.
* For what we know, Xerxes and Leonidas never had a face-to-face talk; most of Xerxes's Xerxes' lines from said scenes are recorded by Herodotus as coming from a simple Persian messenger. Similarly, Themistocles and Artemisia never met each other on the battlefield, although they could have possibly met in Artaxerxes I's court after Themistocles and his family were exiled from Greece.
* Leonidas's LastStand happened historically, but under different circumstances. He didn't sacrifice himself to inspire the rest of Greek states to mobilize to war like in the film, as they were all already fighting along with him and thus there was no need of any inspirational immolation. Instead, when Leonidas realized the Persians would flank them thanks to Ephialtes, he ordered the other city-states' armies to retreat while his own forces and Demophilus's Demophilus' (along with an extra Theban contingent that wanted to surrender) remained behind to give them more time to escape. The trope played there, thus, wasn't a ThanatosGambit, but a YouShallNotPass. However, it's recorded in sources that the Oracle of Delphi told the Spartans their king's death would be necessary to win the war, so it's possible that Leonidas decided to offer his life at least partially out of religious fervor.
* There were actually two Spartan survivors of the 300: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristodemus_of_Sparta Aristodemus]] and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantites Pantites]]. The former had an eye infection and was sent home along with another soldier suffering the same illness, Eurytus, while the latter was on an embassy to Thessaly and did not return in time for battle. Both were disgraced upon their return to Sparta, Aristodemus because Eurytus decided to return and fight despite his own blindness (he went to battle guided by a Helot) helot) and Pantites because he didn't hurry up enough. Aristodemus regained some degree of honor by dying in the Battle of Plataea in a berserk charge, while Pantites preferred to hang himself. Nothing of this happens in the film, where the only survivor is Dilios; he could be considered a CompositeCharacter of Aristodemus and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pausanias_(general) Pausanias]], Leonidas's nephew and leader of the Greek forces in Plataea.



* The film shows the Greek fleet destroyed in Artemisia's bombing tactics the third day of the battle, and they only avoid a Persian victory because Artemisia's own fleet is affected too by the attack. It is underlined by this way that both Leonidas and Themistocles fail at containing the Persian invasions in their respective terrains. In real life, although suffering hard losses, the Greeks actually held at the straits of Artemisium while Leonidas failed at the Hot Gates. They only retreated when the Thermopylae pass was taken and thus defending the nearby sea became irrelevant. (That said, Themistocles and company did realize the much larger Persian fleet would end up overpowering them by sheer attrition sooner or later, so they were already considering the option of retreating when they heard of Leonidas's defeat.) The Greek fleet then sailed to Athens and helped to evacuate it.

to:

* The film shows the Greek fleet destroyed in Artemisia's bombing tactics the third day of the battle, and they only avoid a Persian victory because Artemisia's own fleet is affected too by the attack. It is underlined by this way that both Leonidas and Themistocles fail at containing the Persian invasions in their respective terrains. In real life, although suffering hard losses, the Greeks actually held at the straits of Artemisium while Leonidas failed at the Hot Gates. They only retreated when the Thermopylae pass was taken and thus defending the nearby sea became irrelevant. (That said, Themistocles and company did realize the much larger Persian fleet would end up overpowering them by sheer attrition sooner or later, so they were already considering the option of retreating when they heard of Leonidas's Leonidas' defeat.) The Greek fleet then sailed to Athens and helped to evacuate it.



* The film version of Xerxes burns Athens to the ground after his victory at Thermopylae and Artemisium, which is in historical sources, but modern historians greatly theorize that it might have been Greek propaganda, as Xerxes had no reason to destroy a city of significant strategic value ([[LampshadeHanging which is noted by Artemisia herself in the film]]). On the other hand, Herodotus himself claimed that burning the city was the entire objective of the campaign, a punitive action over Athenian's role in the aforementioned Ionian Revolt, which is why Xerxes preferred to withdraw with most of his forces after losing at Salamina (leaving Mardonius to continue the effort) instead of risking himself.
* The scene with Artemisia insisting that she be allowed to pursue the Greeks to Salamis, with Xerxes trying to dissuade her and noting that it's tactical suicide, portrays both characters exactly backwards from how it was recorded in history. It was Xerxes and his general Mardonius who wanted the big push to crush the Greeks, as they had been deceived by a Greek emissary named [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicinnus Sicinnus]] (actually a spy working for Themistocles) into believing the allied fleet was imminently breaking up. The wary Artemisia proposed to wait for such breakup to happen in order to be sure, but she was ignored, and the result was history.
* In real life, Sparta didn't save the day in a huge BigDamnHeroes moment at Salamis. Not only they had been a part of the allied fleet since the beginning, they had almost no navy at the time and their contribution to the Greek fleet had been less than 5% of the forces present according to Herodotus (ironically, Sparta wouldn't have a proper fleet until the Persian themselves gave them one in order to fight the Athenians during the Peloponnesian Wars). The victory at Salamis was a team effort, and it was accomplished by capitalizing on the Persian AttackAttackAttack approach to lure their ships into the straits. Xerxes's admirals believed they were cornering the Greeks by blocking the straits' exits, but they were really getting into a trap where they were pinned and destroyed.
* The first film ends with the impression that the Battle of Plataea will be a CurbStompBattle for the Greeks, but the reality was almost the opposite: the Greek side screwed it big time and only won because the Persians screwed it even more. To explain, Pausanias and his army had started forming a defensive line on the field, but some skirmishes convinced them to retreat to higher terrains. However, their retreat maneuver was so awkward that their army broke down in several uncoordinated masses, which from away looked like they were disbanding. Believing the Greeks were running away, Mardonius charged carelessly with all his forces in an attempt to finish them, a decision that naturally became a MassOhCrap when they discovered the Greeks were simply repositioning and not forfeiting the battle. With the Persians having placed themselves in an inferior position, Pausanias and company hacked the way through them, and when Mardonius himself was killed by a Spartan slinger, the battle was over.

to:

* The film version of Xerxes burns Athens to the ground after his victory at Thermopylae and Artemisium, which is in historical sources, but modern historians greatly theorize that it might have been Greek propaganda, as Xerxes had no reason to destroy a city of significant strategic value ([[LampshadeHanging which is noted by Artemisia herself in the film]]). On the other hand, Herodotus himself claimed that burning the city was the entire objective of the campaign, a punitive action over Athenian's role in the aforementioned Ionian Revolt, which is why Xerxes preferred to withdraw with most of his forces after losing at Salamina Salamis (leaving Mardonius to continue the effort) instead of risking himself.
* The scene with Artemisia insisting that she be allowed to pursue the Greeks to Salamis, with Xerxes trying to dissuade her and noting that it's tactical suicide, portrays both characters exactly backwards from how it was recorded in history. It was Xerxes and his general Mardonius who wanted the big push to crush the Greeks, as they had been deceived by a Greek emissary named [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicinnus Sicinnus]] (actually a spy working for Themistocles) into believing the allied fleet was imminently breaking up. The wary Artemisia proposed to wait for such breakup to happen in order to be sure, but she was ignored, and the result was history.
history. Herotodus claims that Xerxes thought very highly of Artemisia's advice in this instance, but went ahead with the battle because that was what the majority of his advisors recommended.
* In real life, Sparta didn't save the day in a huge BigDamnHeroes moment at Salamis. Not only they had been a part of the allied fleet since the beginning, they had almost no navy at the time and their contribution to the Greek fleet had been less than 5% of the forces present according to Herodotus (ironically, Sparta wouldn't have a proper fleet until the Persian themselves gave them one in order to fight the Athenians during the Peloponnesian Wars). The victory at Salamis was a team effort, and it was accomplished by capitalizing on the Persian AttackAttackAttack approach to lure their ships into the straits. Xerxes's Xerxes' admirals believed they were cornering the Greeks by blocking the straits' exits, but they were really getting into a trap where they were pinned and destroyed.
* The first film ends with the impression that the Battle of Plataea will be a CurbStompBattle for the Greeks, but the reality was almost the opposite: the Greek side screwed it up big time and only won because the Persians screwed it up even more. To explain, Pausanias and his army had started forming a defensive line on the field, but some skirmishes convinced them to retreat to higher terrains. However, their retreat maneuver was so awkward that their army broke down in several uncoordinated masses, which from away looked like they were disbanding. Believing the Greeks were running away, Mardonius charged carelessly with all his forces in an attempt to finish them, a decision that naturally became a MassOhCrap when they discovered the Greeks were simply repositioning and not forfeiting the battle. With the Persians having placed themselves in an inferior position, Pausanias and company hacked the way through them, and when Mardonius himself was killed by a Spartan slinger, the battle was over.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were essentially slaves in all but name who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make easier for the reader to root for them.

to:

* Firstly of all, the Spartans were far from a rural, freedom-loving society they are portrayed as, and they definitely weren't against "mysticism and tyranny". In reality, they were a deeply religious, militaristic, desigual society where a minority lived by continually and ruthlessly repressing the majority of the population. The latter, called helots, were essentially slaves in all but name who worked the land to produce the food so that the former could spend all their time fighting wars and oppressing them (during some periods, a Spartan had the right to murder helots with impunity). At the end of the day, the Spartans fought the Persian empire not out of any altruistic or progressive political goal, but basically because they were in Xerxes's path just like the rest of the Greek states. Creator/FrankMiller himself acknowledged he omitted the nastiest aspects of Sparta in order to make it easier for the reader to root for them.

Added: 470

Changed: 81

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The incident in which the Spartans threw their Persian emissaries to a well did happen, at least according to Herodotus, but not during Xerxes's reign. It happened during his father Darius's, and its outcome was hardly limited to Sparta, as Athenians did the same, although they were characteristically delicate enough to judge the messengers before tossing them to the pit (speaking of which, the Spartans realized they had gone a bit overboard, so they sent two of their people to be executed in Persia as a reparation). As Xerxes knew these events, he omitted Athens and Sparta when he sent messengers to the Greek cities.

to:

* The incident in which the Spartans threw their Persian emissaries to a well did happen, at least according to Herodotus, but not during Xerxes's reign. It happened during his father Darius's, and its outcome was hardly limited to Sparta, as Athenians did the same, although they were characteristically delicate enough to judge the messengers before tossing them to the pit (speaking of which, the Spartans realized they had gone a bit overboard, so they sent two of their people to be executed in Persia as a reparation).reparation[[note]]Xerxes actually *refused* and simply sent the two back to Sparta[[/note]]). As Xerxes knew these events, he omitted Athens and Sparta when he sent messengers to the Greek cities.


Added DiffLines:

** Modern interpretations of primary sources indicate that in either or both cases, this may not have been the whole truth; the Spartan heartland was in the very south of mainland Greece and an army would need to pass through the much more defensible isthmus of Corinth to threaten them. After Thermopylai, it took the Athenians threatening to defect to the Persians (who, by the way, had just *sacked and destroyed* Athens) to get the Spartans to turn out for Plataia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General editing, also I was suprised to see it wasn't there before.

Added DiffLines:

* In the film, Xerxes leaves the Spartan corpses out in the sun to be consumed by the crows, and letting his soldiers see those who defied him to the end. While in line with the historical Xerxes' reputation for rage, this goes against Persian tradition that valiant warriors, regardless of being friend or foe, should be treated with great honor, and thus the Spartans would have been buried by the Persians. The only exception was Leonidas, whose body was ordered to be decapitated and crucified. Herodotus claimed this could have been in response to Xerxes having lost two of his brothers, Abrocomes and Hyperanthes on the third day.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Athenians running into Marathon in a barbarian style open field charge is just as jarring as the Spartans dueling freely in the Thermopylae. In real life, they did charge in a sort of previously unseen move in order for their slow-moving phalanx to not be picked apart by Persian archers, but it was a tight, controlled march in formation and not a wild individual race. As a result, the heavy phalanx-based Atehian hoplites overpowered the light Persian infantry and provided no room for the Persian cavalry to maneuver on the crowded beach. Had the actual battle been fought like the one in the movie, the Athenian forces would have likely been swarmed and obliterated by the defenders. (It's somewhat justified by the narration saying that Themistocles has the Greeks charge while the Persians are still unloading their troops, leaving them without their horses and without a lot of their troops being able to get off.)

to:

* The Athenians running into Marathon in a barbarian style open field charge is just as jarring as the Spartans dueling freely in the Thermopylae. In real life, they did charge in a sort of previously unseen move in order for their slow-moving phalanx to not be picked apart by Persian archers, but it was a tight, controlled march in formation and not a wild individual race. As a result, the heavy phalanx-based Atehian Athenian hoplites overpowered the light Persian infantry and provided no room for the Persian cavalry to maneuver on the crowded beach. Had the actual battle been fought like the one in the movie, the Athenian forces would have likely been swarmed and obliterated by the defenders. (It's somewhat justified by the narration saying that Themistocles has the Greeks charge while the Persians are still unloading their troops, leaving them without their horses and without a lot of their troops being able to get off.)

Top