Follow TV Tropes

Following

History AdaptationalVillainy / GameOfThrones

Go To

OR

Added: 670

Changed: 397

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Robb doesn't place his mother in house arrest like in the books. In addition, Robb in the show is a much more selfish character than his book counterpart, marrying Talisa/Jeyne out of love instead of preserving honour. Book!Robb at least felt guilt over breaking his pact to the Freys, which he seemed to feel shameless about in the show. Even his bannerman acknowledged this incredibly self-centred act.

to:

* Robb doesn't place Stark:
** In the books, it was Edmure Tully and the AdaptedOut Desmond Grell who placed
his mother in house arrest like in the books. In addition, instead of Robb.
**
Robb in the show is shown as a much more selfish character than his book counterpart, marrying Talisa/Jeyne out of love instead of preserving honour. Book!Robb at least felt guilt over breaking his pact to the Freys, which he seemed to feel shameless about in the show. Even his bannerman acknowledged this incredibly self-centred act.act.
** Due to his AgeLift, he also comes across as much more of a [[Jerkass Jerkass]] than his book counterpart. For example, his KickTheDog moment of reminding Theon he's not a Stark is not present in the books.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* While Aeron Greyjoy's book counterpart was hardly a heroic character, he utterly despised Euron and fought tooth and nail to oppose his claim. Here, he seems perfectly happy to accept him as the new king, and doesn't lift a finger to stop his attempt to murder Yara and Theon, though he doesn't seem particularly enthusiastic about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the books, Robb doesn't place his mother in house arrest like in the show. In addition, Robb in the show is a much more selfish character than his book counterpart, marrying Talisa/Jeyne out of love instead of preserving honour. Book!Robb at least felt guilt over breaking his pact to the Freys, which he seemed to feel shameless about in the show. Even his bannerman acknowledged this incredibly self-centred act.

to:

* In the books, Robb doesn't place his mother in house arrest like in the show.books. In addition, Robb in the show is a much more selfish character than his book counterpart, marrying Talisa/Jeyne out of love instead of preserving honour. Book!Robb at least felt guilt over breaking his pact to the Freys, which he seemed to feel shameless about in the show. Even his bannerman acknowledged this incredibly self-centred act.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the books, it's not Janos Slynt who kills baby Barra but his subordinate Allar Deem. He was, however, fully complicit in the atrocity so he was still very much a villain. His love for his children is also Adapted Out.
* While Meryn Trant is an unpleasant person in the books, his pedophilia is original to the show. His characterisation in the show is also more in line with Boros Blount of the books.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the books, Arya's descent into murder is more gradual, with her first kill, Polliver, done in the heat of the moment to defend Sandor Clegane; Arya's murder of Polliver in the show has her taking a dark pleasure in the Ironic Echo she gives him before slowly stabbing him in the throat, and afterwards she's quite satisfied with herself. In the books, her list of names is a list of people that she hates and wishes were dead, thinking of it as a prayer for their deaths. In the show, Arya explicitly wants to personally kill everyone on her list someday.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the books, Robb doesn't place his mother in house arrest like in the show. In addition, Robb in the show is a much more selfish character than his book counterpart, marrying Talisa/Jeyne out of love instead of preserving honour. Book!Robb at least felt guilt over breaking his pact to the Freys, which he seemed to feel shameless about in the show. Even his bannerman acknowledged this incredibly self-centred act.


Added DiffLines:

* In the books the Freys partially gave Catelyn a MercyKill during the Red Wedding as she goes insane at Robb's death and starts clawing her face. The Freys were intending to keep her hostage but instead kill her. Here, they just kill her after Robb's death.
* Yara Greyjoy:
** Because Theon in the show is more sympathetic than his book counterpart was at that point, Yara comes across as more of a jerkass, as opposed to Asha, who comes across as a KarmicTrickster in terms of her baiting him. Yara is also presented as (largely) following in the footsteps of her father, compared to Asha, who while likewise Balon's favorite, has more pronounced WhiteSheep tendencies. That being said, her crueler tendencies are heavily implied to be an act to force Theon to get his shit together, since she's far more willing to defend Theon to Balon when he's not around, shifting her back into KarmicTrickster territory.
** Her plan in the Kingsmoot is to revive and rebuild the Iron Fleet to never before seen heights implying designs of conquest on a large scale. In the books, she made it clear that she has different intentions, she wants to seek allies with the mainland, abandon superficial conquest and parlay peace with the North in exchange for some land to settle, and convert the Ironborn from reaving to trade. Her speech gets cut off before the end so it's a little confusing as written, though ''in context'' from her prior statements that attacking the mainland is getting them nothing, it appears she meant that she wants to build a ''defensive'' fleet to ward off any counter-attack by the mainland. That being said, the fact that Yara eventually agrees to give up piracy and rein her people in under Dany's rule displays that, while more of a traditionalist than her book counterpart, she's still open-minded enough to commit to change.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->''Sansa'': “Yes, they turned their backs on Jon when it was time to retake Winterfell, and then they named him their King, and now they're ready to turn their backs on him again. How far would you trust men like that? They're all bloody wind vanes.”

to:

-->''Sansa'': -->'''Sansa''': “Yes, they turned their backs on Jon when it was time to retake Winterfell, and then they named him their King, and now they're ready to turn their backs on him again. How far would you trust men like that? They're all bloody wind vanes.”
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

-->''Sansa'': “Yes, they turned their backs on Jon when it was time to retake Winterfell, and then they named him their King, and now they're ready to turn their backs on him again. How far would you trust men like that? They're all bloody wind vanes.”
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the books, the Northern lords are so loyal to House Stark that they are staging an uprising even without any input from the surviving members. In the show, the Starks have to ask for help and even then next to no one answers the call. Not even the Houses who lost families to the Boltons care enough to help. Their loyalty is also very easy to change. As soon as Jon is away, the Lords are quick to suggest that Sansa becomes the new ruler instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Arthur Dayne doesn't give Eddard a "sad smile" before the fight. He was also a KnightInShiningArmor and its hard to imagine Book!Arthur fighting against any single-sword wielder with dual swords, even against multiple opponents since he was especially strict about chivalric fairness. For example, during his famed duel with the outlaw known as the Smiling Knight, Ser Arthur gave the Smiling Knight time to get a new sword after breaking the previous one. In addition, there is no mention in the show that he urged King Aerys to improve the rights of the Kingswood smallfolk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* During the Red Wedding scene, a change by the adaptation makes Walder Frey even more monstrous than he was in the books. Due to the absence of the book character Jinglebell (Walder's mentally-handicapped grandson), Catelyn targets one of his wives instead. In the book, he states that Jinglebell does not have anything to offer the family and that Catelyn has no leverage in the situation - [[KickTheDog cruel]], [[PragmaticVillainy but understandable for someone so pragmatic]]. In the show, he simply says that [[ReplacementGoldfish he can always get another wife]], making him sound misogynist and self-centered in addition to cruel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* While Book!Euron is generally despicable, perhaps the one decent thing about him is that he has a soft spot for the deformed and disabled, surrounding himself with dwarfs, giants, cripples, mutes, and freaks, if only to make himself seem more intimidating by their presence. Here, he heavily insinuates that Tyrion should have been killed at birth for being a dwarf.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Linking directly instead of through redirect.


** In the books, he owes his success to appearing as a harmless, witty {{Trickster}} rather than the show's ObviouslyEvil DevilInPlainSight who openly feuds with TheSpymaster.

to:

** In the books, he owes his success to appearing as a harmless, witty {{Trickster}} [[TheTrickster Trickster]] rather than the show's ObviouslyEvil DevilInPlainSight who openly feuds with TheSpymaster.

Added: 1543

Changed: 528

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Balon Greyjoy is unequivocally nasty to Theon in the show, where in the books, he's fairly impressed that Theon stands up to him and gives him eight ships instead of just one (making his mission less [[YouGetMeCoffee embarrassingly unimportant]]).[[note]]In the books, Dagmer tells Theon outright that the only one who feels sidelined is Theon.[[/note]] The show also declines to establish that as lord of perhaps the most misogynist region of Westeros, Balon is ''extraordinarily'' comfortable with the idea of his daughter succeeding him.

to:

* Balon Greyjoy Greyjoy:
** He
is unequivocally nasty to Theon in the show, where whereas in the books, though he still insults him and plans to disinherit him in favor of his daughter, he's fairly impressed that Theon stands up to him him, saying "Well, at the least you are no craven" and gives him a mission that is actually strategically valuable with eight ships instead of just one and far more soldiers (making his mission less of an [[YouGetMeCoffee embarrassingly unimportant]]).unimportant]] task to get him out of the way).[[note]]In the books, Dagmer tells Theon outright that the only one who feels sidelined is Theon.[[/note]] The Furthermore he doesn't completely ignore Theon's return to Pyke and sends his uncle Aeron to greet him, and his refusal to negotiate and save Theon from Ramsay is entirely original to the show also — Book!Balon never actually finds out if Theon survived the Bolton attack on Winterfell.
** Him insulting Yara when she questions his plans results in a death threat, in the books Balon's only redeeming virtue was that he was a genuinely decent father to Asha/Yara. In the show, it's left ambiguous if Yara was going to truly be Balon's heir, but in the books he repeatedly made his intentions clear that he wanted her to inherit the Throne after his death and it was his brother Aeron who revived a custom no one had seen for three hundred years solely to stall her claim, thus the show
declines to establish that as lord of perhaps the most misogynist region of Westeros, Balon is ''extraordinarily'' comfortable with the idea of his daughter succeeding him.him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Selyse is a haughty and narrow-minded GrandeDame whose complete faith in the Lord of Light leads her to urge radical action in the books, but the show emphasizes her fanaticism to the level of a MadWomanInTheAttic who keeps her stillborns in PeopleJars and despises her own daughter as sinful rather than barely mentioning her stillbirths and verging on MyBelovedSmother in her protection of Shireen.

to:

* Selyse is a haughty and narrow-minded GrandeDame whose complete faith in the Lord of Light leads her to urge radical action in the books, but the show emphasizes her fanaticism to the level of a MadWomanInTheAttic who keeps her stillborns in PeopleJars and despises and resents her own daughter as sinful sinful, and according to WordOfGod, because her daughter is a living reminder of her failure to provide Stannis with a son, rather than barely mentioning her stillbirths and verging on MyBelovedSmother in her protection of Shireen.

Changed: 64

Removed: 428

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He only relents from executing Davos and answers the call of the Night's Watch when Melisandre abruptly changes her mind on these issues, whereas in the books he makes these decisions himself after Davos appeals to his sense of duty to the realm. Even after this, he frequently threatens Davos like a BadBoss in the show, while in the books, Davos is his OnlyFriend and held in the highest regard.

to:

** He only relents from executing Davos and answers the call of the Night's Watch when Melisandre abruptly changes her mind on these issues, whereas in the books he makes these decisions himself after Davos appeals to his sense of duty to the realm.realm, and this ends up removing the selfless nature of these actions. Even after this, he frequently threatens Davos like a BadBoss in the show, while in the books, Davos is his OnlyFriend and held in the highest regard.



** A key instance that is AdaptedOut is his CharacterDevelopment. Book!Stannis is intended to be a little unsympathetic at first, but eventually proves himself to be, as per WordOfGod, "a just man" when he saves the Night's Watch for altruistic reasons. In the show, his visit to save the Wall comes because Melisandre shows him a vision of him fighting in the snow, and this ends up removing the selfless nature of this action.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** While Human Sacrifice is part of R'hllor worship, Stannis never burns anyone purely for the sake of fanaticism, rather he punishes rapists, cannibals or in the case of his former Hand, outright betrayal and conspiring with the Lannisters. Likewise, the men he burns simply for refusing his religious commandment in "The Lion and the Rose" were traitors who conspired to sell him out and [[PapaWolf surrender his daughter]] in the books.

to:

** While Human Sacrifice HumanSacrifice is part of R'hllor worship, Stannis never burns anyone purely for the sake of fanaticism, rather he punishes rapists, cannibals or in the case of his former Hand, outright betrayal and conspiring with the Lannisters. Likewise, the men he burns simply for refusing his religious commandment in "The Lion and the Rose" were traitors who conspired to sell him out and [[PapaWolf surrender his daughter]] in the books.

Added: 745

Changed: 1322

Removed: 333

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Stannis gets a lot of this, despite being far from a paragon in the novels:

to:

* Stannis gets a lot of this, despite being far from a paragon in the novels:novels. On the whole, the show's version of Stannis is a CharacterExaggeration of Stannis's flaws at the expense of his more frequently displayed virtues. In one featurette, D.B. Weiss admits he dislikes Stannis. This is also compounded by the fact that many of Stannis' enemies (Tyrells, Renly, Varys) are given AdaptationalHeroism.
** The nuances, such as moments when he is more moderate than his wife's retinue (who introduced R'hllor worship to Dragonstone) are lost. Stannis isn't a fanatical R'hllor worshipper, he sees Melisandre as a sorceress and believes only in her magical abilities but is far less rigid about other aspects of her faith.



** He's much less reluctant to practice HumanSacrifice, needing only one victim of the leech curse to be wholly convinced to sacrifice his nephew even though the expected benefit is much more ambiguous than the ''dragon'' promised in the novels.
*** Likewise, the men he burns simply for refusing his religious commandment in "The Lion and the Rose" were traitors who conspired to sell him out and [[PapaWolf surrender his daughter]] in the books.

to:

** He's much less reluctant to practice HumanSacrifice, needing only one victim While Human Sacrifice is part of R'hllor worship, Stannis never burns anyone purely for the leech curse to be wholly convinced to sacrifice his nephew even though the expected benefit is much more ambiguous than the ''dragon'' promised sake of fanaticism, rather he punishes rapists, cannibals or in the novels.
***
case of his former Hand, outright betrayal and conspiring with the Lannisters. Likewise, the men he burns simply for refusing his religious commandment in "The Lion and the Rose" were traitors who conspired to sell him out and [[PapaWolf surrender his daughter]] in the books.



** He burns [[spoiler: his only child, Shireen,]] alive in "The Dance of Dragons" to end the blizzard afflicting his army. While the burning may indeed happen in future novels, at the equivalent point in the books he refuses to burn anyone (not even captives or unbelievers) except as punishment for cannibalism and dispatches Ser Justin Massey with specific instructions to [[spoiler: press Shireen's claim to the throne]] should he die in the coming battle.
*** Not to mention if said burning does happen it is quite possible if not likely that it would not be committed by Stannis himself.

to:

** He burns [[spoiler: his only child, Shireen,]] alive in "The Dance of Dragons" to end the blizzard afflicting his army. While the burning may indeed happen in future novels, at the equivalent point in the books books, as mentioned above, he refuses to burn anyone (not even captives or unbelievers) except as punishment for cannibalism and dispatches Ser Justin Massey with specific instructions to [[spoiler: press Shireen's claim to the throne]] should he die in the coming battle.
*** Not
battle - not to mention if said burning does happen it is quite possible if not likely that it would not be committed by Stannis himself. In the books, Stannis is hundreds of miles away still besieging Winterfell and possibly dead while Shireen is at the Wall while it's in a chaotic state of emergency. WordOfSaintPaul (the showrunners) insist that she will be sacrificed indeed, but the precise circumstances will obviously be entirely different.


Added DiffLines:

** A key instance that is AdaptedOut is his CharacterDevelopment. Book!Stannis is intended to be a little unsympathetic at first, but eventually proves himself to be, as per WordOfGod, "a just man" when he saves the Night's Watch for altruistic reasons. In the show, his visit to save the Wall comes because Melisandre shows him a vision of him fighting in the snow, and this ends up removing the selfless nature of this action.

Added: 797

Changed: 1272

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the first book, Robert confides that the only reason he doesn't sail away to Essos to become a mercenary is because he knows that Joffrey is a monster who should not be on the throne; despite his multiple failings, his misery is driven by the fact that he's martyring himself to keep a tenuous peace while his wife manipulates "their" son into destroying it. In the show, he comes across as much more of a drunk toddler, railing constantly about the things he can't have and shirking his responsibilities at every turn solely because of petulance.
** Also, due to Cersei's Adaptational Heroism, the abuse in their marriage of convenience comes across as more one-sided, while in the books, Cersei is portrayed as cruel and vindictive from the get-go, such as when Robert suggests bringing his beloved bastard daughter Mya Stone to court and Cersei implies she'll have the girl killed (it's also implied this wouldn't be the first time she's done away with one of Robert's bastard children).

to:

* Robert Baratheon:
**
In the first book, Robert confides that the only reason he doesn't sail away to Essos to become a mercenary is because he knows that Joffrey is a monster who should not be on the throne; despite his multiple failings, his misery is driven by the fact that he's martyring himself to keep a tenuous peace while his wife manipulates "their" son into destroying it. In the show, he comes across as much more of a drunk toddler, railing constantly about the things he can't have and shirking his responsibilities at every turn solely because of petulance.
** Also, due to Cersei's Adaptational Heroism, the abuse in their marriage of convenience comes across as more one-sided, while in the books, Cersei is portrayed as cruel and vindictive from the get-go, such as get-go because of Robert killing Rhaegar, and even had sex with Jaime on her own wedding day (and still the deal-breaker came when Robert used Lyanna's name with her in bed) and Robert was the one who put in some effort to make it work. In addition, when Robert suggests bringing his beloved bastard daughter Mya Stone to court and court, Cersei implies she'll have the girl killed (it's also implied this wouldn't be the first time she's done away with one of Robert's bastard children).children). In the show, Cersei loved Robert at first, while Robert fell immediately into despair and alcoholism due to Lyanna's death.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the books, [[spoiler: Doreah]] is simply a dutiful servant who dies of illness CrossingTheDesert. The show gives her a more selfish personality and a fascination with dragons (who can fly where they please and kill those in their way), eventually leading to an abrupt FaceHeelTurn, and in a deleted scene she [[KickTheDog kicks the dog]] by personally [[spoiler: strangling Irri]].

to:

* In the books, [[spoiler: Doreah]] is simply a dutiful servant who dies of illness CrossingTheDesert. CrossingTheDesert, and is loyal to Dany to the extent where Dany stops her Khalasar in the Red Waste so she can die in peace. The show gives her a more selfish personality and a fascination with dragons (who can fly where they please and kill those in their way), eventually leading to an abrupt FaceHeelTurn, FaceHeelTurn where she willingly betrays Dany to Xaro, and in a deleted scene she [[KickTheDog kicks the dog]] by personally [[spoiler: strangling Irri]].Irri]]. In her commentary on the Season 2 finale, Emilia Clarke states that there was another deleted scene where she explained her reasons for betraying Dany, clearly speaking directly to the people who were upset about this change, which appears to happen for little motivation in the final product. Unfortunately, she doesn't go into detail on what those reasons were.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Cersei's motivation for empowering the High Sparrow also changes in the show. In the book, she makes him the High Septon in order to have the protection of the Faith Militant. She didn't try to have them to target the Tyrells until after she became suspicious that they were in cahoots with Tyrion. In the show, she empowers the High Sparrow and his followers solely to get back at Margaery.

to:

** Cersei's motivation for empowering the High Sparrow also changes in the show. In the book, she makes him the High Septon in order to have the protection of the Faith Militant.Militant (and to have him cancel a substantial debt that doesn't exist in the show). She didn't try to have them to target the Tyrells until after she became suspicious that they were in cahoots with Tyrion. In the show, she empowers the High Sparrow and his followers solely to get back at Margaery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[spoiler: Alliser Thorne]] is not present for the mutiny in the books as he is far away on an assignment.

to:

** [[spoiler: Alliser Thorne]] is not present for the mutiny in the books as he is far away on an assignment. In the show he's the ringleader.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** She also lacks her (admittedly few) PetTheDog moments like helping to protect Devan Seaworth and Alys Karstark, and the omission of Abel the Bard removes perhaps her greatest PetTheDog moment in favour of more HumanSacrifice.
* Joffrey is a horrific, power-crazed psychopath in the books as well, but the show makes him ''even worse'' by giving him two of Cersei's KickTheDog moments - he is the one who orders both the massacre of Robert's bastards and the assassination attempt on Tyrion during the battle of the Blackwater. He also treats Cersei horribly and has a taste for sexualized violence, having Ros beat another prostitute, that's at best an [[AgeLift age-based]] extrapolation of his sadistic streak, culminating in him coldly murdering a [[NominalImportance named character]] by hogtying her to a bedpost and riddling her with crossbow bolts just to see how it feels to murder someone yourself.

to:

** She also lacks her (admittedly few) PetTheDog moments like helping to protect Devan Seaworth and Alys Karstark, and the Karstark. The omission of Abel the Bard removes perhaps her greatest PetTheDog moment in favour of more HumanSacrifice.
* Joffrey is a horrific, power-crazed psychopath in the books as well, but the show makes him ''even worse'' by giving him two of Cersei's KickTheDog moments - -- he is the one who orders both the massacre of Robert's bastards illegitimate children, including the infant girl Barra, and the assassination attempt on Tyrion during the battle of the Blackwater. He also treats Cersei horribly and has a taste for sexualized violence, having ordering Ros to beat another prostitute, that's at best prostitute -- this may be an [[AgeLift age-based]] extrapolation of his sadistic streak, culminating which culminates in him coldly murdering a [[NominalImportance named character]] by hogtying her to a bedpost and riddling her with crossbow bolts just to see how it feels to murder someone yourself.



* The Night's Watch mutineers in "Mother's Mercy" are motivated solely by xenophobia in the show instead of their more multi-faceted reasons from the books. In the books, Jon likewise works to save the wildlings, which some of his officers ''really'' don't like, but Jon ''also'' ends up involving himself in the affairs of the realm as a result of ScrewTheRulesImDoingWhatsRight -- compromising the Watch's stance on neutrality. As described by the [[https://meereeneseblot.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/others-wars-part-iv-people-wanting-help/ Meereenese blog essays]], Jon's Achille's heel as a leader of a traditional and neutral system is his hero's instinct to save innocents in danger and fix injustices -- which ends up posing potential risks to the Watch because it compromises the Watch's neutrality. Meanwhile, Bowen Marsh and the other mutineers view Jon is breaking his oaths as they fear the help he has given Stannis will invite the Iron Throne's wrath against them and they strongly disagree with Jon's efforts to ally with and save the wildlings. When Jon announces his intention to march south and confront Ramsay Bolton after receiving Ramsay's threatening letter to him, thereby publicly breaking his neutrality as Lord Commander, the mutineers act to assassinate him. Bowen Marsh is crying as he stabs Jon, visibly upset as he feels he has no choice. In the books, the situation is a difficult one while in the show, it is made more clear-cut between right and wrong.

to:

* The Night's Watch mutineers in "Mother's Mercy" are motivated solely by xenophobia in the show instead of their more multi-faceted reasons from the books. In the books, Jon likewise works to save the wildlings, which some of his officers ''really'' don't like, but Jon ''also'' ends up involving himself in the affairs of the realm as a result of ScrewTheRulesImDoingWhatsRight -- compromising the Watch's stance on neutrality. As described by the [[https://meereeneseblot.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/others-wars-part-iv-people-wanting-help/ Meereenese blog blot essays]], Jon's Achille's heel as a leader of a traditional and neutral system is his hero's instinct to save innocents in danger and fix injustices -- which ends up posing potential risks to the Watch because it compromises the Watch's neutrality. Meanwhile, Bowen Marsh and the other mutineers view Jon is breaking his oaths as they fear the help he has given Stannis will invite the Iron Throne's wrath against them and they strongly disagree with Jon's efforts to ally with and save the wildlings. When Jon announces his intention to march south and confront Ramsay Bolton after receiving Ramsay's threatening letter to him, thereby publicly breaking his neutrality as Lord Commander, the mutineers act to assassinate him. Bowen Marsh is crying as he stabs Jon, visibly upset as he feels he has no choice. In the books, the situation is a difficult one while in the show, it is made more clear-cut between right and wrong.



* Book!Dany often shows a softer side that is sometimes missing from the show, the most notable being the absence of her horrified despair when Viserys draws steel in Vaes Dothrak, knowing that her brother has sentenced himself to death and the lack of how she pleads for a reconciliation. In the moments she reminisces on her recently-departed sibling, it is without a hint of fondness and is instead dripping with scorn or derision, while in the book she acknowledged his effect on her formative years and how he loved, educated and protected her until the stresses of responsibility for his little sister, coupled with the humiliation of exile snapped his sanity in twain, which she forgives him for. She also has at least a couple of innocent Meereenese nobles executed at random on the grounds of "justice", either with crucifixion or dragon-fire, while when the city submits in the books, Dany lets the nobility choose who they will hand over to her to pay for the child slaves being nailed to posts.

to:

* Book!Dany often shows a softer side that is sometimes missing from the show, the most notable being the absence of her horrified despair when Viserys draws steel in Vaes Dothrak, knowing that her brother has sentenced himself to death and the lack of how she pleads for a reconciliation. In the moments she reminisces on her recently-departed sibling, sibling on the show, it is without a hint of fondness and is instead dripping with scorn or derision, while in derision. In the book books, she acknowledged acknowledges his effect on her formative years and how he loved, educated and protected her until the stresses of responsibility for his little sister, coupled with the humiliation of exile snapped his sanity in twain, which she forgives him for. She also has at least a couple of innocent Meereenese nobles executed at random on the grounds of "justice", either with crucifixion or dragon-fire, while when the city submits in the books, Dany lets the nobility choose who they will hand over to her to pay for the child slaves being nailed to posts.

Added: 109

Changed: 2691

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He only relents from executing Davos and answers the call of the Night's Watch when Melisandre abruptly changes her mind on these issues, whereas in the books he makes these decisions himself after Davos appeals to his sense of duty to the realm. Even after this, he frequently threatens Davos like a BadBoss in the show, while in the books Davos is his OnlyFriend and held in the highest regard.

to:

** He only relents from executing Davos and answers the call of the Night's Watch when Melisandre abruptly changes her mind on these issues, whereas in the books he makes these decisions himself after Davos appeals to his sense of duty to the realm. Even after this, he frequently threatens Davos like a BadBoss in the show, while in the books books, Davos is his OnlyFriend and held in the highest regard.



** In the books, he owes his success to seeming like a harmless, witty {{Trickster}} rather than the show's ObviouslyEvil DevilInPlainSight who openly feuds with TheSpymaster.
** Similarly, though he's certainly responsible for making Jeyne Poole a SexSlave, brothels are only one of his many investments and he isn't involved in anything quite so vile as regularly serving up prostitutes to necrophiliacs and serial killers in the books.

to:

** In the books, he owes his success to seeming like appearing as a harmless, witty {{Trickster}} rather than the show's ObviouslyEvil DevilInPlainSight who openly feuds with TheSpymaster.
** Similarly, though he's Littlefinger is certainly responsible for making Jeyne Poole a SexSlave, brothels are only one of his many investments and he isn't involved in anything quite so vile as regularly serving up prostitutes to necrophiliacs and serial killers in the books.



** However evil Littlefinger maybe in the books, he's not enough to atleast serve up Sansa on a spoon to Ramsey. Littlefinger in fact takes a level in kindness in 'Alayne' s' presence.
** [[spoiler: Season 7 finale reveals it was ''he'' who ordered Bran's assassination, rather than Joffrey, just to further fan the flames between the Starks and the Lannisters.]]

to:

** However evil Littlefinger maybe may be in the books, he's he does not enough to atleast serve up Sansa on a spoon silver platter to Ramsey. In the books, Littlefinger in fact takes a level in kindness when in 'Alayne' s' presence.
** [[spoiler: The Season 7 finale reveals it was ''he'' who ordered Bran's assassination, rather than Joffrey, just to further fan the flames between the Starks and the Lannisters.]]



* The Night's Watch mutineers in "Mother's Mercy" are motivated solely by xenophobia instead of their more multi-faceted reasons from the books, particularly Jon's secret interference at Winterfell and his decision to attack the Boltons after Jon receives a threatening letter signed by Ramsay Bolton, which they justifiably see as a breach of their vows (though Jon makes the case that since ItsPersonal, he has the right to defend himself and confront the threat).
** Furthermore, they [[IShallTauntYou taunt him]] with a "traitor" sign and only Olly seems upset, rather than them ''all'' expressing remorse because they believe their hands have been forced.
** [[spoiler: Alliser Thorne]] in particular is also far away and completely uninvolved in the coup in the novels.

to:

* The Night's Watch mutineers in "Mother's Mercy" are motivated solely by xenophobia in the show instead of their more multi-faceted reasons from the books. In the books, particularly Jon likewise works to save the wildlings, which some of his officers ''really'' don't like, but Jon ''also'' ends up involving himself in the affairs of the realm as a result of ScrewTheRulesImDoingWhatsRight -- compromising the Watch's stance on neutrality. As described by the [[https://meereeneseblot.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/others-wars-part-iv-people-wanting-help/ Meereenese blog essays]], Jon's secret interference at Winterfell Achille's heel as a leader of a traditional and neutral system is his decision hero's instinct to attack save innocents in danger and fix injustices -- which ends up posing potential risks to the Boltons Watch because it compromises the Watch's neutrality. Meanwhile, Bowen Marsh and the other mutineers view Jon is breaking his oaths as they fear the help he has given Stannis will invite the Iron Throne's wrath against them and they strongly disagree with Jon's efforts to ally with and save the wildlings. When Jon announces his intention to march south and confront Ramsay Bolton after Jon receives a receiving Ramsay's threatening letter signed by Ramsay Bolton, which they justifiably see to him, thereby publicly breaking his neutrality as a breach of their vows (though Jon makes Lord Commander, the case that since ItsPersonal, mutineers act to assassinate him. Bowen Marsh is crying as he stabs Jon, visibly upset as he feels he has no choice. In the books, the situation is a difficult one while in the show, it is made more clear-cut between right and wrong.
-->'''George R. R. Martin''': Were they mistakes (by Jon)? I guess they were mistakes in some ways since they led to him losing control of part of his group. But it might have been wise and necessary decisions in terms of protecting the realm and dealing with the threat of the White Walkers. I’m a huge student of history, and all through history there’s always this question of what’s
the right to defend himself decision. You look back with benefit of hindsight at a battle that was lost and confront say, ‘The losing general was such an idiot.’ Was Napoleon a genius for all the threat).
battles he won? Or an idiot for losing at Waterloo? Partly I’m reacting to a lot of the fantasy that has come before this. Ruling is difficult whether you’re a Lord Commander of the Night’s Watch or the King of England. These are hard decisions and each have consequences. We’re looking at Jon trying to take control of Night’s Watch and deal with the wildlings and the threat beyond The Wall.
** Furthermore, they the mutineers [[IShallTauntYou taunt him]] with a "traitor" sign and only Olly seems upset, rather than them ''all'' expressing remorse because they believe their hands have been forced.
** [[spoiler: Alliser Thorne]] is not present for the mutiny in particular the books as he is also far away and completely uninvolved in the coup in the novels.on an assignment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Book!Dany often shows a softer side that is sometimes missing from the show, the most notable being the absence of her horrified despair when Viserys draws steel in Vaes Dothrak, knowing that her brother has sentenced himself to death and the lack of how she pleads for a reconciliation. In the moments she reminisces on her recently-departed sibling, it is without a hint of fondness and is instead dripping with scorn or derision, while in the book she acknowledged his effect on her formative years and how he loved, educated and protected her until the stresses of responsibility for his little sister, coupled with the humiliation of exile snapped his sanity in twain, which she forgives him for. She also has at least a couple of innocent Meereenese nobles executed at random on the grounds of "justice", either with crucifixion or dragon-fire. While when the city submits in the books, Dany lets the nobility choose who they will hand over to her to pay for the child slaves being nailed to posts.

to:

* Book!Dany often shows a softer side that is sometimes missing from the show, the most notable being the absence of her horrified despair when Viserys draws steel in Vaes Dothrak, knowing that her brother has sentenced himself to death and the lack of how she pleads for a reconciliation. In the moments she reminisces on her recently-departed sibling, it is without a hint of fondness and is instead dripping with scorn or derision, while in the book she acknowledged his effect on her formative years and how he loved, educated and protected her until the stresses of responsibility for his little sister, coupled with the humiliation of exile snapped his sanity in twain, which she forgives him for. She also has at least a couple of innocent Meereenese nobles executed at random on the grounds of "justice", either with crucifixion or dragon-fire. While dragon-fire, while when the city submits in the books, Dany lets the nobility choose who they will hand over to her to pay for the child slaves being nailed to posts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Book!Dany often shows a softer side that is sometimes missing from the show, the most notable being the absence of her horrified despair when Viserys draws steel in Vaes Dothrak, knowing that her brother has sentenced himself to death and the lack of how she pleads for a reconciliation. In the moments she reminisces on her recently-departed sibling, it is without a hint of fondness and is instead dripping with scorn or derision, while in the book she acknowledged his effect on her formative years and how he loved, educated and protected her until the stresses of responsibility for his little sister, coupled with the humiliation of exile snapped his sanity in twain, which she forgives him for. She also has at least a couple of innocent Meereenese nobles executed at random on the grounds of "justice", either with crucifixion or dragon-fire. While when the city submits in the books, Dany lets the nobility choose who they will hand over to her to pay for the child slaves being nailed to posts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Joffrey is a horrific, power-crazed psychopath in the books as well, but the show makes him ''even worse'' by giving him two of Cersei's KickTheDog moments - he is the one who orders both the massacre of Robert's bastards and the assassination attempt on Tyrion during the battle of the Blackwater. He also treats Cersei horribly and has a taste for sexualized violence, having Ros beat another prostiture, that's at best an [[AgeLift age-based]] extrapolation of his sadistic streak, culminating in him coldly murdering a [[NominalImportance named character]] by hogtying her to a bedpost and riddling her with crossbow bolts just to see how it feels to murder someone yourself.

to:

* Joffrey is a horrific, power-crazed psychopath in the books as well, but the show makes him ''even worse'' by giving him two of Cersei's KickTheDog moments - he is the one who orders both the massacre of Robert's bastards and the assassination attempt on Tyrion during the battle of the Blackwater. He also treats Cersei horribly and has a taste for sexualized violence, having Ros beat another prostiture, prostitute, that's at best an [[AgeLift age-based]] extrapolation of his sadistic streak, culminating in him coldly murdering a [[NominalImportance named character]] by hogtying her to a bedpost and riddling her with crossbow bolts just to see how it feels to murder someone yourself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Joffrey is a horrific, power-crazed psychopath in the books as well, but the show makes him ''even worse'' by giving him two of Cersei's KickTheDog moments and a taste for sexualized violence that's at best an [[AgeLift age-based]] extrapolation of his sadistic streak, culminating in him coldly murdering a [[NominalImportance named character]] just to see how it feels.

to:

* Joffrey is a horrific, power-crazed psychopath in the books as well, but the show makes him ''even worse'' by giving him two of Cersei's KickTheDog moments - he is the one who orders both the massacre of Robert's bastards and the assassination attempt on Tyrion during the battle of the Blackwater. He also treats Cersei horribly and has a taste for sexualized violence violence, having Ros beat another prostiture, that's at best an [[AgeLift age-based]] extrapolation of his sadistic streak, culminating in him coldly murdering a [[NominalImportance named character]] by hogtying her to a bedpost and riddling her with crossbow bolts just to see how it feels.feels to murder someone yourself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***Not to mention if said burning does happen it is quite possible if not likely that it would not be committed by Stannis himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the books, Shae tries to apologize and cries while she tells Tyrion that the Queen made her lie in the trial, but she ends up saying the wrong thing and Tyrion kills her. In the series, she goes straight to the knife in an attempt to kill Tyrion, without any kind of conversation.

Top