[003]
LadWatcher
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Ozpin: \
to:
Ozpin: \\\"As first year students, you will be shadowing a huntsman...\\\"
Velvet: (To RWBY) \\\"Oh but don\\\'t worry. You\\\'re first year students so you\\\'ll be shadowing a huntsman. You should be fine.\\\"
If I\\\'m not wrong then Team CFVY spent several days fighting Grimm and survived. It came to the point where everyone looked at them with awe when they finally came back. They\\\'re strong to the point they don\\\'t act as backup for hunters. They are considered hunters already.
As for the Grimm issue. Here\\\'s my two cents: It\\\'s unfair to say that Grimm can\\\'t be used as measurement for how strong a character is based on a single fight. Sure, they were defeated but take in account that the main characters only took part on it but they weren\\\'t the turning point. The military was there. We watched the soldiers drop into the city from every direction and eliminate the Grimm. It was a lucky shot. It did make it look easy but there is a reason why the show is basically Mankind vs Monsters. This was just a lucky shot and not even the main dish.
Instead of claiming that victories over Grimm are not enough to prove someone is very strong, why don\\\'t we wait a little longer to judge that? This show is going to get dark. Volume 2 was mostly filler because of its technical problems. Grimm were never meant to look so harmless. They just haven\\\'t gotten a chance to show just how dangerous they can truly be.
Plus Coco has a gatling gun so she doesn\\\'t count as an example of how easy the Grimm can be. Give the same weapon to any character and you get the same results... on that note, Coco shouldn\\\'t really count as a badass now that I look at it that way since she basically had the perfect weapon for the perfect situation.
Velvet: (To RWBY) \\\"Oh but don\\\'t worry. You\\\'re first year students so you\\\'ll be shadowing a huntsman. You should be fine.\\\"
If I\\\'m not wrong then Team CFVY spent several days fighting Grimm and survived. It came to the point where everyone looked at them with awe when they finally came back. They\\\'re strong to the point they don\\\'t act as backup for hunters. They are considered hunters already.
As for the Grimm issue. Here\\\'s my two cents: It\\\'s unfair to say that Grimm can\\\'t be used as measurement for how strong a character is based on a single fight. Sure, they were defeated but take in account that the main characters only took part on it but they weren\\\'t the turning point. The military was there. We watched the soldiers drop into the city from every direction and eliminate the Grimm. It was a lucky shot. It did make it look easy but there is a reason why the show is basically Mankind vs Monsters. This was just a lucky shot and not even the main dish.
Instead of claiming that victories over Grimm are not enough to prove someone is very strong, why don\\\'t we wait a little longer to judge that? This show is going to get dark. Volume 2 was mostly filler because of its technical problems. Grimm were never meant to look so harmless. They just haven\\\'t gotten a chance to show just how dangerous they can truly be.
Plus Coco has a gatling gun so she doesn\\\'t count as an example of how easy the Grimm can be. Give the same weapon to any character and you get the same results... on that note, Coco shouldn\\\'t really count as a badass now that I look at it that way since she basically had the perfect weapon for the perfect situation.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Ozpin: \
to:
Ozpin: \\\"As first year students, you will be shadowing a huntsman...\\\"
Velvet: (To RWBY) \\\"Oh but don\\\'t worry. You\\\'re first year students so you\\\'ll be shadowing a huntsman. You should be fine.\\\"
If I\\\'m not wrong then Team CFVY spent several days fighting Grimm and survived. It came to the point where everyone looked at them with awe when they finally came back. They\\\'re strong to the point they don\\\'t act as backup for hunters. They are considered hunters already.
As for the Grimm issue. Here\\\'s my two cents: It\\\'s unfair to say that Grimm can\\\'t be used as measurement for how strong a character is based on a single fight. Sure, they were defeated but take in account that the main characters only took part on it but they weren\\\'t the turning point. The military was there. We watched the soldiers drop into the city from every direction and eliminate the Grimm. It was a lucky shot. It did make it look easy but there is a reason why the show is basically Mankind vs Monsters. This was just a lucky shot and not even the main dish.
Instead of claiming that \\\"Character vs Grimm = Character Wins\\\" is not a challenge but a walk in the park instead, why don\\\'t we wait a little longer to judge that? This show is going to get dark. Volume 2 was mostly filler because of its technical problems. Grimm were never meant to look so harmless. They just haven\\\'t gotten a chance to show just how dangerous they can truly be.
Plus Coco has a gatling gun so she doesn\\\'t count as an example of how easy the Grimm can be. Give the same weapon to any character and you get the same results... on that note, Coco shouldn\\\'t really count as a badass now that I look at it that way since she basically had the perfect weapon for the perfect situation.
Velvet: (To RWBY) \\\"Oh but don\\\'t worry. You\\\'re first year students so you\\\'ll be shadowing a huntsman. You should be fine.\\\"
If I\\\'m not wrong then Team CFVY spent several days fighting Grimm and survived. It came to the point where everyone looked at them with awe when they finally came back. They\\\'re strong to the point they don\\\'t act as backup for hunters. They are considered hunters already.
As for the Grimm issue. Here\\\'s my two cents: It\\\'s unfair to say that Grimm can\\\'t be used as measurement for how strong a character is based on a single fight. Sure, they were defeated but take in account that the main characters only took part on it but they weren\\\'t the turning point. The military was there. We watched the soldiers drop into the city from every direction and eliminate the Grimm. It was a lucky shot. It did make it look easy but there is a reason why the show is basically Mankind vs Monsters. This was just a lucky shot and not even the main dish.
Instead of claiming that \\\"Character vs Grimm = Character Wins\\\" is not a challenge but a walk in the park instead, why don\\\'t we wait a little longer to judge that? This show is going to get dark. Volume 2 was mostly filler because of its technical problems. Grimm were never meant to look so harmless. They just haven\\\'t gotten a chance to show just how dangerous they can truly be.
Plus Coco has a gatling gun so she doesn\\\'t count as an example of how easy the Grimm can be. Give the same weapon to any character and you get the same results... on that note, Coco shouldn\\\'t really count as a badass now that I look at it that way since she basically had the perfect weapon for the perfect situation.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Ozpin: \
to:
Ozpin: \\\"As first year students, you will be shadowing a huntsman...\\\"
Velvet: (To RWBY) \\\"Oh but don\\\'t worry. You\\\'re first year students so you\\\'ll be shadowing a huntsman. You should be fine.\\\"
If I\\\'m not wrong then Team CFVY spent several days fighting Grimm and survived. It came to the point where everyone looked at them with awe when they finally came back. They\\\'re strong to the point they don\\\'t act as backup for hunters. They are considered hunters already.
As for the Grimm issue. Here\\\'s my two cents: It\\\'s unfair to say that Grimm can\\\'t be used as measurement for how strong a character is based on a single fight. Sure, they were defeated but take in account that the main characters only took part on it but they weren\\\'t the turning point. The military was there. We watched the soldiers drop into the city from every direction and eliminate the Grimm. It was a lucky shot. Sure, it made them look easy but there is a reason why the show is basically Mankind vs Monsters.
Instead of claiming that \\\"Character vs Grimm = Character Wins\\\" is not a challenge but a walk in the park instead, why don\\\'t we wait a little longer to judge that? This show is going to get dark. Volume 2 was mostly filler because of its technical problems. Grimm were never meant to look so harmless. They just haven\\\'t gotten a chance to show just how dangerous they can truly be.
Plus Coco has a gatling gun so she doesn\\\'t count as an example of how easy the Grimm can be. Give the same weapon to any character and you get the same results.
Velvet: (To RWBY) \\\"Oh but don\\\'t worry. You\\\'re first year students so you\\\'ll be shadowing a huntsman. You should be fine.\\\"
If I\\\'m not wrong then Team CFVY spent several days fighting Grimm and survived. It came to the point where everyone looked at them with awe when they finally came back. They\\\'re strong to the point they don\\\'t act as backup for hunters. They are considered hunters already.
As for the Grimm issue. Here\\\'s my two cents: It\\\'s unfair to say that Grimm can\\\'t be used as measurement for how strong a character is based on a single fight. Sure, they were defeated but take in account that the main characters only took part on it but they weren\\\'t the turning point. The military was there. We watched the soldiers drop into the city from every direction and eliminate the Grimm. It was a lucky shot. Sure, it made them look easy but there is a reason why the show is basically Mankind vs Monsters.
Instead of claiming that \\\"Character vs Grimm = Character Wins\\\" is not a challenge but a walk in the park instead, why don\\\'t we wait a little longer to judge that? This show is going to get dark. Volume 2 was mostly filler because of its technical problems. Grimm were never meant to look so harmless. They just haven\\\'t gotten a chance to show just how dangerous they can truly be.
Plus Coco has a gatling gun so she doesn\\\'t count as an example of how easy the Grimm can be. Give the same weapon to any character and you get the same results.
