[001]
SchizoTechnician
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think one of the big concerns here is diversity. In general, we seem to be going for as many series as possible, especially with regards to the top brass. I think the big concern is that we end up with the Exalted pantheon in charge of \'\'everything\'\'; you seem to be putting them on top for pantheons that already have someone of sufficient power to be in charge (war, now heroes and villains); I had to put in a joke lampshading the fact that there\'s a lot of crossover between the portfolios of Ebon Dragon and Melkor regarding position in the pantheon- we really should try for only one god per trope, except in cases where distinctly unique aspects of the trope can be displayed by each (Cloud as God of BFS as most well known, Rakan as God of BFS for the Biggest and Most F S ); with a number of your Exalted additions, we seem to need to reach a fair bit to keep it from being redundant- maybe you could make more effort to explain how their portfolios are distinct from the preexisting ones?
to:
I think one of the big concerns here is diversity. In general, we seem to be going for as many series as possible, especially with regards to the top brass. I think the big concern is that we end up with the Exalted pantheon in charge of \\\'\\\'everything\\\'\\\'; you seem to be putting them on top for pantheons that already have someone of sufficient power to be in charge (war, now heroes and villains); I had to put in a joke lampshading the fact that there\\\'s a lot of crossover between the portfolios of Ebon Dragon and Melkor regarding position in the pantheon- we really should try for only one god per trope, except in cases where distinctly unique aspects of the trope can be displayed by each (Cloud as God of BFS as most well known, Rakan as God of BFS for the Biggest and Most F S ); with a number of your Exalted additions, we seem to need to reach a fair bit to keep it from being redundant- maybe you could make more effort to explain how their portfolios are distinct from the preexisting ones? And, again, try not to put them on top \\\'\\\'everywhere\\\'\\\'; we \\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\' have other top movers and shakers from other series, and diversity is key here.
