[002]
69.47.223.209
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In that case the entry should go back in, because I can source everything I\'m saying from the books, while the opposing argument is based largely on \'I don\'t think so\' or \'It\'s not that unreasonable\'. But as me putting it back in would be edit war territory, its up to the mods now.
to:
In that case I think the entry should go back in, because I can source everything I\\\'m saying from the books, while the opposing argument is based largely on \\\'I don\\\'t think so\\\' or \\\'It\\\'s not that unreasonable\\\'. But as me putting it back in would be edit war territory, its up to the mods now.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In that case the entry should go back in, because I can source everything I\'m saying from the books, while the opposing argument is based largely on \'I don\'t think so\' or \'It\'s not that unreasonable\'.
to:
In that case the entry should go back in, because I can source everything I\\\'m saying from the books, while the opposing argument is based largely on \\\'I don\\\'t think so\\\' or \\\'It\\\'s not that unreasonable\\\'. But as me putting it back in would be edit war territory, its up to the mods now.
