[003]
70.211.8.193
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Oh, so now the geth did in fact exterminate the quarians? Basic logic and multiple in-universe statements rule the day? Because in the other conversation, you\'re trying to deny that by saying that \
to:
So now the geth did in fact exterminate the quarians? Basic logic and multiple in-universe statements rule the day? Because in the other conversation, you\\\'re trying to deny that by saying that \\\"we don\\\'t know the exact details\\\", even though the example you wanted cut said the same thing (geth wiped out the majority of the quarian population in a genocide). And you are again completely taking the geth account as fact by calling their sparing of the last quarians \\\"mercy\\\" when you solely have the word of one geth for it being mercy rather than something else that kept them from finishing their brutal genocide. And saying that the genocide was \\\"forced\\\" on them and only done to \\\"ensure their survival\\\", even though it\\\'s impossible that all of the billions they killed were a threat, and the geth could\\\'ve simply left Rannoch and fled to where no one could follow? Great.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Oh, so now the geth did in fact exterminate the quarians? Basic logic and multiple in-universe statements rule the day? Because in the other conversation, you\'re trying to deny that by saying that \
to:
Oh, so now the geth did in fact exterminate the quarians? Basic logic and multiple in-universe statements rule the day? Because in the other conversation, you\\\'re trying to deny that by saying that \\\"we don\\\'t know the exact details\\\", even though the example you wanted cut said the same thing (geth wiped out the majority of the quarian population in a genocide). And more completely taking the geth account as fact, I see, by calling their sparing of the last quarians \\\"mercy\\\" when you solely have the word of one geth for it being mercy rather than something else that kept them from finishing their brutal genocide. And saying that the genocide was \\\"forced\\\" on them and only done to \\\"ensure their survival\\\", even though it\\\'s impossible that all of the billions they killed were a threat. and the geth could\\\'ve simply left Rannoch and fled to where no one could follow? Great.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Oh, so now the geth did in fact exterminate the quarians? Basic logic and multiple in-universe statements rule the day? Because in the other conversation, you\'re trying to deny that by saying that \
to:
Oh, so now the geth did in fact exterminate the quarians? Basic logic and multiple in-universe statements rule the day? Because in the other conversation, you\\\'re trying to deny that by saying that \\\"we don\\\'t know the exact details\\\", even though the example you wanted cut said the same thing (geth wiped out the majority of the quarian population in a genocide). And more completely taking the geth account as fact, I see, by calling their sparing of the last quarians \\\"mercy\\\" when you solely have the word of one geth for it being mercy rather than something else that kept them from finishing their brutal genocide. And saying that the genocide was \\\"forced\\\" on them and only done to \\\"ensure their survival\\\", even though it\\\'s impossible that all of the billions they killed were a threat? Great.
