[003]
216.99.32.45
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To put it another way... [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps Fred Phelps]] also believes that he is a good guy, also has the law on his side, and also embodies many of the same negative traits as Pakku (except with homophobia replacing misogyny). Yet you\'ll never see anyone claiming that we should \
to:
To put it another way... [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps Fred Phelps]] also believes that he is a good guy, also has the law on his side, and also embodies many of the same negative traits as Pakku (except with homophobia replacing misogyny). Yet you\\\'ll never see anyone claiming that we should \\\"think of things from his point of view\\\" or \\\"respect his opinions.\\\"
EDIT: Just so we\\\'re absolutely clear, I\\\'m not trying to sound insulting. I do totally understand why someone might consider this moment a case of protagonist-centered morality, I just very strongly disagree with that opinion, for the reasons I\\\'ve mentioned. I think that at the very most this one is only arguably a case of PCM, and even then only in terms of Katara assaulting Pakku (which, really, is a crime and she probably should have been held accountable for it), not in terms of Pakku being considered wrong.
EDIT: Just so we\\\'re absolutely clear, I\\\'m not trying to sound insulting. I do totally understand why someone might consider this moment a case of protagonist-centered morality, I just very strongly disagree with that opinion, for the reasons I\\\'ve mentioned. I think that at the very most this one is only arguably a case of PCM, and even then only in terms of Katara assaulting Pakku (which, really, is a crime and she probably should have been held accountable for it), not in terms of Pakku being considered wrong.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To put it another way... [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps Fred Phelps]] also believes that he is a good guy, also has the law on his side, and also embodies many of the same negative traits as Pakku (except with homophobia replacing misogyny). Yet you\'ll never see anyone claiming that we should \
to:
To put it another way... [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps Fred Phelps]] also believes that he is a good guy, also has the law on his side, and also embodies many of the same negative traits as Pakku (except with homophobia replacing misogyny). Yet you\\\'ll never see anyone claiming that we should \\\"think of things from his point of view\\\" or \\\"respect his opinions.\\\"
EDIT: Just so we\\\'re absolutely clear, I\\\'m not trying to sound insulting. I do totally understand why someone might consider this moment a case of protagonist-centered morality, I just very strongly disagree with that opinion, for the reasons I\\\'ve mentioned.
EDIT: Just so we\\\'re absolutely clear, I\\\'m not trying to sound insulting. I do totally understand why someone might consider this moment a case of protagonist-centered morality, I just very strongly disagree with that opinion, for the reasons I\\\'ve mentioned.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
To put it another way... [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps Fred Phelps]] also believes that he is a good guy, also has the law on his side, and also embodies many of the same negative traits as Pakku. Yet you\'ll never see anyone claiming that we should \
to:
To put it another way... [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Phelps Fred Phelps]] also believes that he is a good guy, also has the law on his side, and also embodies many of the same negative traits as Pakku (except with homophobia replacing misogyny). Yet you\\\'ll never see anyone claiming that we should \\\"think of things from his point of view\\\" or \\\"respect his opinions.\\\"
