[002]
ChrisX
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m thinking that Bender should be replaced. Now call me \'never watched {{Futurama}}\' all you want, but on the look alone, Bender DOES NOT HAVE A HUMAN-LIKE FIGURE! HE\'S JUST A BIPEDAL ROBOT! HE DOESN\'T HAVE A HUMAN HEAD, HUMAN MOUTH, ETC! Even if he feels emotion and all, he does not represent RidiculouslyHumanRobot! Although, he might fit better in other robotic tropes.
to:
I\\\'m thinking that Bender should be replaced. Now call me \\\'never watched {{Futurama}}\\\' all you want, but on the look alone, Bender doesn\\\'t seem ridiculously human enough. I thought that RidiculouslyHumanRobot needs to not only have human emotions/free wills/etc, but also look like human with human features like eye, nose that looks like human? Judging from the looks, Bender sure doesn\\\'t look like it, he only fulfills half of it.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m thinking that Bender should be replaced. Now call me \'never watched {{Futurama}}\' all you want, but on the look alone, Bender DOES NOT HAVE A HUMAN-LIKE FIGURE! HE\'S JUST A BIPEDAL ROBOT! HE DOESN\'T HAVE A HUMAN HEAD, HUMAN MOUTH, ETC! Even if he feels emotion and all, he might not fit in the trope AT ALL!
to:
I\\\'m thinking that Bender should be replaced. Now call me \\\'never watched {{Futurama}}\\\' all you want, but on the look alone, Bender DOES NOT HAVE A HUMAN-LIKE FIGURE! HE\\\'S JUST A BIPEDAL ROBOT! HE DOESN\\\'T HAVE A HUMAN HEAD, HUMAN MOUTH, ETC! Even if he feels emotion and all, he does not represent RidiculouslyHumanRobot! Although, he might fit better in other robotic tropes.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If not, I propose that someone improve his entry, it looks like a very raw entry.
to:
If not, I propose that someone improve his entry, it looks like a very raw, \\\'lazily inserted\\\' entry.
