Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / Asexuality

Go To

[003] Westrim Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I know he can be both dysfunctional and asexual, but his dysfunction is so overriding it\'s hard separate his sexuality, or lack of it, from that dysfunction with any certainty. The light novels, which as the source material are further along, are definitely setting up for Sousuke and Kaname to be together at the end and have had Sousuke [[spoiler: say that he loves her]], so short of WordOfGod that he\'s asexual, I have to chalk it up to \'people issues\', not \'sex issues.\'
to:
I know dysfunction does not exclude asexuality, but his dysfunction is so overriding it\\\'s hard separate his sexuality, or lack of it, from that dysfunction with any certainty without directly addressing it. As is, all the situations that he gets embarrassed in most guys would be embarrassed- just not in his way or to his degree. The light novels, which as the source material are further along, are definitely setting up for Sousuke and Kaname to be together at the end and have had Sousuke [[spoiler: say that he loves her]], so short of WordOfGod that he\\\'s asexual, I have to chalk it up to \\\'people issues\\\', not \\\'sex issues.\\\'
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I edited the entry about \'Firefly,\' removing natter which 1) didn\'t relate to the topic, 2) bashed the creator needlessly and dubiously, and 3) came across as exactly the (misaimed) person the entry described.
to:
I edited the entry about \\\'Firefly,\\\' removing natter which 1) didn\\\'t relate to the topic, 2) bashed the creator needlessly and dubiously, and 3) came across like the troper who added it fit into the description of the misaimed fandom, and was complaining about it.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I edited the entry about \'Firefly,\' which 1) didn\'t relate to the topic, 2) bashed the creator needlessly and dubiously, and 3) came across as exactly the (misaimed) person the entry described.
to:
I edited the entry about \\\'Firefly,\\\' removing natter which 1) didn\\\'t relate to the topic, 2) bashed the creator needlessly and dubiously, and 3) came across as exactly the (misaimed) person the entry described.
Top