Discussion History Main / CoveredUp

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going onto a tangent about actual who published what hoax and who exposed it on what is only supposed to be a trope page about it appearing in fiction. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach all the people who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission Report, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the Bermuda Triangle hoax itself and its exposure. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better suited for such a potential UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going onto a tangent about actual facts involving the real hoax that was exposed on what is only supposed to be a trope page about it appearing in fiction. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach all the people who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission Report, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the Bermuda Triangle hoax itself and its exposure. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better suited for such a potential UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going onto a tangent about actual facts involving the real hoax that was exposed on what is only supposed to be a trope page about it appearing in fiction. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach all the people who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission Report, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the Bermuda Triangle hoax itself and its exposure. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going onto a tangent about actual facts involving the real hoax that was exposed on what is only supposed to be a trope page about it appearing in fiction. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach all the people who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission Report, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle hoax itself and its exposure. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going onto a tangent about actual facts involving the real hoax that was exposed on what is only supposed to be a trope page about it appearing in fiction. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach all the people who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission Report, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle hoax itself and its exposure, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going onto a tangent about actual facts involving the real hoax that was exposed on what is only supposed to be a trope page about it appearing in fiction. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach all the people who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission Report, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going onto a tangent about actual facts involving the real hoax that was exposed on what is only supposed to be a trope page about it appearing in fiction. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach all the people who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going onto a tangent about actual facts involving the real hoax that was exposed on what is only supposed to be a trope page about it appearing in fiction. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work together on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page. I think that\\\'s fair.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I, together, can work on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks at present for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts. I\\\'d even say there are a few wicks for TheBermudaTriangle that can be better switched over to a potential new UsefulNotes page.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the media trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Just like we have BigApplesauce to focus on the trope about how New York City appears and behaves in fiction and media and NewYorkCity to teach people the interesting facts about the real New York City, I think we might want to consider TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the trope and UsefulNotes/TheBermudaTriangle to focus on the interesting facts.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNotes page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNotes page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective component. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and most objective fact. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and objective fact. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to teach \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your description markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and objective fact. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about other untrue things in our world and history, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to educate \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your description markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and objective fact. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about untrue things in our world and history as well, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to educate \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That sort of purpose is what we created UsefulNotes for.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your description markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and objective fact. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page. We have other tropes about untrue things in our world and history as well, but we don\\\'t go off on tangents on WhoShotJFK to educate \\\"a lot of people\\\" who believe in a Kennedy assassination conspiracy the \\\"interesting facts\\\" of the Warren Commission, for instance. That kind of information is what we have the UsefulNotes pages for.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your description markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and objective fact. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location mapped out on Earth, but in your description markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and objective fact. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.

All in all, your intentions, while perfectly well-meaning, are peripheral to what the page itself is supposed to be. This is supposed to be a trope page about TheBermudaTriangle as it appears in fiction. The page doesn\\\'t give anybody a \\\"snotty attitude.\\\" It simply states what trope readers of the page have come across and what the trope deals with; that is the primary purpose of the page description for a trope--not to point out or explain what discrediting evidence there is for something that nobody anywhere on the wiki is calling the least bit factual, anyway.

Your objective to share \\\"interesting facts\\\" about the real Bermuda Triangle sounds much more appropriate and better suited for a UsefulNote page. This page here, however, is intended to cover a trope in fiction and media. If you want, both you and I can work on writing up a UsefulNote page about the interesting facts and history behind the BermudaTriangle, and then we can link to it in the trope description as \\\"further reading\\\" for anybody who wishes to know more about the real Bermuda Triangle itself and the full nature of how the hoax was spawned and eventually discredited. There\\\'s no reason why we should be going into these details on what is only supposed to be a trope page.

Additional changes you are making to the description aren\\\'t really that great, either. TheBermudaTriangle is a trope about a specific location, but in your description markup the fact that it\\\'s somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean is buried in the middle of the second paragraph at the end of the description. Above all, that should be the very first thing people read about the trope, just as it is on [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle the other wiki]], especially seeing that it\\\'s the trope\\\'s most obvious and objective fact. Otherwise, it makes for a less direct outline for people to follow.

I am calm. Nothing I have said has been the least bit hostile or \\\"harsh\\\" towards you or what you say. I just simply do not agree with what you are saying, and the arguments you put forward are just not very convincing.