[005]
VVK
Current Version
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I prefer this solution. There is also another one (though it doesn\'t change the fact that the text had untrue elements). If you take TheGreatCharacterAlignmentDebate as settled the way that article states, then what should be done would be to remove the note on the alignment pages stating that examples can go in the work\'s YMMV tab (unless that doesn\'t count as \
to:
Of course, if you take the page TheGreatCharacterAlignmentDebate too literally, you can\\\'t even use character alignments on YMMV pages (and maybe even the alignment pages), but since it is stated otherwise elsewhere, I don\\\'t think that\\\'s how it\\\'s meant.
Actually maybe it should just be changed. I\\\'m going to do that, and I hope this works.
Actually maybe it should just be changed. I\\\'m going to do that, and I hope this works.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Additionally, this bit of text implies indirectly that works that do use the alignment system have characters that have a clearly defined alignment by these criteria. This is unlikely to be the case. They may have clearly \'\'stated\'\' alignments, but that does mean they fit the criteria.
to:
Additionally, this bit of text implies indirectly that works that do use the alignment system have characters that have a clearly defined alignment by these criteria. This is unlikely to be the case. They may have clearly \\\'\\\'stated\\\'\\\' alignments, but that does mean they fit the criteria perfectly.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I prefer this solution. There is also another one (though it doesn\'t change the fact that the text had untrue elements). If you take TheGreatCharacterAlignmentDebate as settled the way that article states, then what should be done would be to remove the note on the alignment pages stating that examples can go in the work\'s YMMV tab (unless that doesn\'t count as \
to:
I prefer this solution. There is also another one (though it doesn\\\'t change the fact that the text had untrue elements). If you take TheGreatCharacterAlignmentDebate as settled the way that article states, then what should be done would be to remove the note on the alignment pages stating that examples can go in the work\\\'s YMMV tab (unless that doesn\\\'t count as \\\"being used in a work\\\"), and maybe specifically state that they can\\\'t go even there. And maybe remove all the examples from the alignment pages themselves. But I don\\\'t think we should do that, and if not, the above text was too harsh.
Actually maybe it should just be changed. I\\\'m going to do that, and I hope this works.
Actually maybe it should just be changed. I\\\'m going to do that, and I hope this works.
