[001]
iamnoone
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"Predictably, the film has been receiving mixed-to-negative reviews so far. Possibly more polarizing than the previous movie, general consensus seems to be that it\\\'s an improvement over ROTF, but how much is a subject of debate.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Er, the film has barely even came out. It hasn\\\'t even been released Nationwide yet. Acording to the other Wiki, Both IGN and another news thing, forgot the name, is calling it the best in the franchise, with only Rotten Tomatos reviewing it Mixed to Negative.
Why is it being reffered to being Mixed to negative when only one site, which is \\\'\\\'known\\\'\\\' to be unneedingly critical of some things and has negatively reviewed some truely awesome films, when two other sites, and possibly others, are reffering to it as a SuprisinglyImprovedSequel?
Er, the film has barely even came out. It hasn\\\'t even been released Nationwide yet. Acording to the other Wiki, Both IGN and another news thing, forgot the name, is calling it the best in the franchise, with only Rotten Tomatos reviewing it Mixed to Negative.
Why is it being reffered to being Mixed to negative when only one site, which is \\\'\\\'known\\\'\\\' to be unneedingly critical of some things and has negatively reviewed some truely awesome films, when two other sites, and possibly others, are reffering to it as a SuprisinglyImprovedSequel?
