[002]
Westrim
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Far too many of these examples are Fanon and and assumptions with little or no evidence one way or the other. As far as I know, we really shouldn\'t be including \'\'anyone\'\' who isn\'t explicitly or heavily hinted at being asexual. Feel free to put them back in, but a lot of these examples are about to get gone. Sorry if this offends anyone whose entries I\'m deleting.
to:
Far too many of these examples are Fanon and and assumptions with little or no evidence one way or the other. As far as I know, we really shouldn\\\'t be including \\\'\\\'anyone\\\'\\\' who isn\\\'t explicitly or heavily hinted at being asexual. Feel free to put them back in, but a lot of these examples are about to get gone. Sorry if this offends anyone whose entries I\\\'m deleting. Also, understand that I haven\\\'t seen many of these works so I\\\'m mostly going by how the entries are written. If it turns out that I delete one that was blatantly obvious to someone who has seen it, sorry.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Far too many of these examples are Fanon and and assumptions with little or no evidence one way or the other. As far as I know, we really shouldn\'t be including \'\'anyone\'\' who isn\'t explicitly or heavily hinted at being asexual. Feel free to put them back in, but a lot of these examples are about to get gone.
to:
Far too many of these examples are Fanon and and assumptions with little or no evidence one way or the other. As far as I know, we really shouldn\\\'t be including \\\'\\\'anyone\\\'\\\' who isn\\\'t explicitly or heavily hinted at being asexual. Feel free to put them back in, but a lot of these examples are about to get gone. Sorry if this offends anyone whose entries I\\\'m deleting.
