[001]
AnonymousMcCartneyfan
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I used to own one of those, though I don\'t think it lasted long enough to get recalled. It might not be as good as a {{Colecovision}}, but it could play any games made for Colecovision (yes, even the ones that stood alone), so it wasn\'t a complete failure on for gaming. As long as power was running through the word processor, it would be fine...
to:
I used to own one of those, though I don\\\'t think it lasted long enough to get recalled. It might not be as good as a {{Colecovision}}, but it could play any games made for Colecovision (yes, even the ones that stood alone), so it wasn\\\'t a complete failure on for gaming. As long as power was running through the [[strike:word processor]] printer, it would be fine...
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Now, the Adam as an \'\'add-on\'\' might qualify. I liked my stand-alone despite its numerous flaws, but if you already had the Colecovision, this probably wasn\'t what you were looking for.
to:
Now, the Adam as an \\\'\\\'add-on\\\'\\\' might qualify. I liked my stand-alone despite its numerous flaws, but I liked using it for word processing. Daisy-wheel printers were considered a feature in 1984. (Problem with a machine with no OS -- no way to port unprinted documents.) But if you already had a Colecovision, this probably wouldn\\\'t help your gaming needs.
