Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'BuffyTheVampireSlayer\'\' -- dropping this sub-example. As the natter points out this character is probably not a good example.
to:
\\\'\\\'BuffyTheVampireSlayer\\\'\\\' -- dropping this sub-example. As the natter points out this character is probably not a good example. RepairDontRespond.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Deconstruction doesn\'t mean \
to:
Deconstruction doesn\\\'t mean \\\"if this trope ever, \\\'\\\'ever\\\'\\\' happens in real life, it has to happen like this.\\\" It\\\'s not a reflection of absolute reality. It\\\'s taking the trope to its furthest conclusion. It \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' an exaggeration--exaggerating the trope, but seeing how that exaggeration would play in real life.
As for the PlayingWith pages, the problem there is half the people who add Deconstruction/Reconstruction to the list \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' understand it. They really do think Deconstruction/Reconstruction boils down to \\\"trope occurs and BAD THINGS/GOOD THINGS happen\\\", and they\\\'re wrong on that. So don\\\'t go to the PlayingWith pages to see what those terms mean, because most of the time they\\\'re way off.
The way I sum it up is this:
->Deconstruction: Why they\\\'re \\\'\\\'fiction\\\'\\\' tropes.
->Reconstruction: Why they\\\'re fiction \\\'\\\'tropes\\\'\\\'.
As for the PlayingWith pages, the problem there is half the people who add Deconstruction/Reconstruction to the list \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' understand it. They really do think Deconstruction/Reconstruction boils down to \\\"trope occurs and BAD THINGS/GOOD THINGS happen\\\", and they\\\'re wrong on that. So don\\\'t go to the PlayingWith pages to see what those terms mean, because most of the time they\\\'re way off.
The way I sum it up is this:
->Deconstruction: Why they\\\'re \\\'\\\'fiction\\\'\\\' tropes.
->Reconstruction: Why they\\\'re fiction \\\'\\\'tropes\\\'\\\'.
