Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History WesternAnimation / StarWarsTheCloneWars

Go To

[002] JBK405 Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
OldManHoOh, I accidentally submitted my last edit before I was done commenting (My last sentence become somewhat gibberish) and I\'m hoping to avoid an edit war. let\'s take this here, shall we?
to:
OldManHoOh, I accidentally submitted my last edit before I was done commenting (My last sentence became somewhat gibberish) and I\\\'m hoping to avoid an edit war. Let\\\'s take this here, shall we?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1) All opening notes of the sectionectomy page refer to the editing/deleting/splitting of whole pages, referring to independent trope pages. If an example section is too big delete the whole section, if the article has poor focus then delete the article. At no point does it refer to the deletion of individual trope examples.
to:
1) All opening notes of the sectionectomy page refer to the editing/deleting/splitting of whole pages, referring to independent trope pages. If an example section is too big delete the whole section, if the article has poor focus then delete the article, etc. At no point does it refer to the deletion of individual trope examples on other pages.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
2) \
to:
2) \\\"Leaves only the definition, and some scar tissue saying \\\'No examples please. This only defines the term\\\'\\\" - This description, from the fourth type of sectionectomy (Which Bechdel test is included in) clearly describes a Trope page, since it refers to leaving in a description of the term.

3) Tropes that are not supposed to be placed on \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' pages have headers which say \\\"Do not put on a works page.\\\" See CompleteMonster, LoveItOrHateIt, RuinedFOREVER, etc. There they explicitly say that this is a YMMV trope or trivia and is not proper to place on another page.

The ExampleSectionectomy process refers to the management of trope pages that are bloated, out of control or filled with {{natter}} and personal opinion. It does not refer to a trope becoming verbotten on \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' pages.

EDIT: Oh, and like I pointed out in my edit comment, the very name is indicative: Example Sectionectomy. As in \\\"removing of the example \\\'\\\'section\\\'\\\'\\\" (Like \\\"Appendectomy\\\", removing of the appendix). I\\\'m sure it\\\'s probably not the accurate medical term if such a term were to exist, but its meaning is clear.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1) All opening notes refer to the editing/deleting/splitting of whole pages, referring to independent trope pages. If an example section is too big delete the whole section, if the article has poor focus then delete the article. At no point does it refer to the deletion of individual trope examples.
to:
1) All opening notes of the sectionectomy page refer to the editing/deleting/splitting of whole pages, referring to independent trope pages. If an example section is too big delete the whole section, if the article has poor focus then delete the article. At no point does it refer to the deletion of individual trope examples.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
2) \
to:
2) \\\"Leaves only the definition, and some scar tissue saying \\\"No examples please. This only defines the term\\\"\\\" - This description, from the fourth type of sectionectomy (Which Bechdel test is included in) clearly describes a Trope page, since it refers to leaving in a description of the term.

3) Tropes that are not supposed to be placed on \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' pages have headers which say \\\"Do not put on a works page.\\\" See CompleteMonster, LoveItOrHateIt, RuinedFOREVER, etc... There they explicitly say that this is a YMMV trope or trivia and is not proper to place on another page.

The ExampleSectionectomy process refers to the management of trope pages that are bloated, out of control or filled with {{natter}} and personal opinion. it does not refer to a trope becoming verbotten on \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' pages.
Top