[002]
JBK405
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Hold on, wait, I think we\'re all arguing different things. I (And I think Uncl Ghost) am not saying that this is StarWars InNameOnly, which I think is what you think we\'re saying. We\'re saying that certain parts of the series, like individual planets and some characters, are InNameOnly representations of those characters or planets, not that the entire series is so different as to count as InNameOnly. Ryloth is Ryloth InNameOnly, Greedo is Greedo InNameOnly (Although again I\'ve got to point out I \'\'really\'\' did not care for the \
to:
Hold on, wait, I think we\\\'re all arguing different things. I (And I think Uncl Ghost) am not saying that this is StarWars InNameOnly, which I think is what you think we\\\'re saying. We\\\'re saying that certain parts of the series, like individual planets and some characters, are InNameOnly representations of those characters or planets, not that the entire series is so different as to count as InNameOnly. Ryloth is Ryloth InNameOnly, Greedo is Greedo InNameOnly (Although again I\\\'ve got to point out I \\\'\\\'really\\\'\\\' did not care for the \\\"original\\\" Greedo backstory, so I definitely spport their change here), the Talz are Talz InNameOnly (Their [[PlanetOfHats hat]] in the EU is extreme pacifism, even leading to heightened stress when fighting in a simulator), etc. The series itself, though, is not an InNameOnly adaptation of Star Wars, as the universe as a whole fits in just fine. If we were saying that the show itself counted as InNameOnly then you would be absolutely correct in pointing out how this is just as close, if not closer, to the original canon as the EU is.
Am I right in that we\\\'re misunderstanding each other?
Am I right in that we\\\'re misunderstanding each other?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Hold on, wait, I think we\'re all arguing different things. I (And I think Uncl Ghost) am not saying that this is StarWars InNameOnly, which I think is what you think we\'re saying. We\'re saying that certain parts of the series, like individual planets and some characters, are InNameOnly representations of those characters or planets, not that the entire series is so different as to count as InNameOnly. If we were saying that then you would be absolutely correct in pointing out how this is just as close, if not closer, to the original canon as the EU is.
to:
Hold on, wait, I think we\\\'re all arguing different things. I (And I think Uncl Ghost) am not saying that this is StarWars InNameOnly, which I think is what you think we\\\'re saying. We\\\'re saying that certain parts of the series, like individual planets and some characters, are InNameOnly representations of those characters or planets, not that the entire series is so different as to count as InNameOnly. Ryloth is Ryloth InNameOnly, Greedo is Greedo InNameOnly (Although again I\\\'ve got to point out I \\\'\\\'really\\\'\\\' did not care for the \\\"original\\\" Greedo backstory, so I definitely spport their change here), the Talz are Talz InNameOnly (Their [[PlanetOfHats hat]] in the EU is extreme pacifism, even leading to heightened stress when fighting in a simulator), etc. The series itself, though, is not an InNameOnly adaptation of STar Wars, as the universe as a whole fits in just fine. If we were saying that the show itself counted as InNameOnly then you would be absolutely correct in pointing out how this is just as close, if not closer, to the original canon as the EU is.
