Discussion History WesternAnimation / StarWarsTheCloneWars

The information contained in that section is largely just a re-statement of the definition of the BroadStrokes trope (That the series takes some info from other sources and makes up some of its own). It does have series-specific info (The levels of canon of the different works) but it explains them as a justification for not adhering to them perfectly, an \\\"It\\\'s okay that we\\\'re only using BroadStrokes because of XXXXX\\\" kind of thing. It even starts with \\\"As much as people complain when [the EU] is contradicted....\\\" and then goes on to say why the complainers are wrong, which says that this is a JustifyingEdit. It also then moves on into FanWank, since the second paragraph (Bulletpoint?) wonders if the series might actually be an AlternateContinuity all together, since it doesn\\\'t match the novels exactly.

Like I said in the edit notes, it\\\'s not because this info is wrong, it\\\'s not because I dislike this info, I removed it because it\\\'s redundant and unnecessary. \\\"All works are canon, but some take precedence if there\\\'s a conflict\\\" is practically the very definition of BroadStrokes, and [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment is stated again right in the middle of the explanation]], and is part of what is essentially a justifying edit, which are no-no\\\'s here. When I shortened the section I included a bit that explained that nature of Star Wars canon, and would have no objection to somebody expanding that with more detail (I did not go into what the different canon levels are called, or which are \\\"higher\\\" or \\\"lower\\\"), but as it stands these two paagraphs (Bullet points?) are not proper for this wiki.

EDIT: Oh, also, it is customary for a discussion to be had \\\'\\\'before\\\'\\\' a contested issue is added or re-added to the article (See my own discussion about FridgeLogic above this one), even if that means taking it out now even if it will be readded later. When two people are stuck in an edit-war it is supposed to be left out until a consensus is reached, a \\\"better safe than sorry\\\" mindset that prevents Edit Wars.

The information contained in that section is largely just a re-statement of the definition of the BroadStrokes trope (That the series takes some info from other sources and makes up some of its own). It does have series-specific info (The levels of canon of the different works) but it explains them as a justification for not adhering to them perfectly, an \\\"It\\\'s okay that we\\\'re only using BroadStrokes because of XXXXX\\\" kind of thing. It even starts with \\\"As much as people complain when [the EU] is contradicted....\\\" and then goes on to say why the complainers are wrong, which says that this is a JustifyingEdit. It also then moves on into FanWank, since the second paragraph (Bulletpoint?) wonders if the series might actually be an AlternateContinuity all together, since it doesn\\\'t match the novels exactly.

Like I said in the edit notes, it\\\'s not because this info is wrong, it\\\'s not because I dislike this info, I removed it because it\\\'s redundant and unnecessary. \\\"All works are canon, but some take precedence if there\\\'s a conflict\\\" is practically the very definition of BroadStrokes, and [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment is stated again right in the middle of the explanation]], and is part of what is essentially a justifying edit, which are no-no\\\'s here. When I shortened the section I included a bit that explained that nature of Star Wars canon, and would have no objection to somebody expanding that with more detail (I did not go into what the different canon levels are called, or which are \\\"higher\\\" or \\\"lower\\\"), but as it stands these two paagraphs (Bullet points?) are not proper for this wiki.

EDIT: Oh, also, it is customary for a discussion to be had \\\'\\\'before\\\'\\\' a contested issue is added or re-added to the article (See my own discussion about FridgeLogic above this one), even if that means taking it out now even if it will be readded later. When two people are stuck in an edit-war it is supposed to be left out until a consensus is reached, a \\\"better safe than sorry\\\" mindset that prevents EditWars.

The information contained in that section is largely just a re-statement of the definition of the BroadStrokes trope (That the series takes some info from other sources and makes up some of its own). It does have series-specific info (The levels of canon of the different works) but it explains them as a justification for not adhering to them perfectly, an \\\"It\\\'s okay that we\\\'re only using BroadStrokes because of XXXXX\\\" kind of thing. It even starts with \\\"As much as people complain when [the EU] is contradicted....\\\" and then goes on to say why the complainers are wrong, which says that this is a JustifyingEdit. It also then moves on into FanWank, since the second paragraph (Bulletpoint?) wonders if the series might actually be an AlternateContinuity all together, since it doesn\\\'t match the novels exactly.

Like I said in the edit notes, it\\\'s not because this info is wrong, it\\\'s not because I dislike this info, I removed it because it\\\'s redundant and unnecessary. \\\"All works are canon, but some take precedence if there\\\'s a conflict\\\" is practically the very definition of BroadStrokes, and [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment is stated again right in the middle of the explanation]], and is part of what is essentially a justifying edit, which are no-no\\\'s here. When I shortened the section I included a bit that explained that nature of Star Wars canon, and would have no objection to somebody expanding that with more detail (I did not go into what the different canon levels are called, or which are \\\"higher\\\" or \\\"lower\\\"), but as it stands these two paagraphs (Bullet points?) are not proper for this wiki.