[003]
MagBas
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, in this i agree with the mysterious vandal. Quoting the archived discussion\
to:
Well, in this i agree with the guy that removed the examples. Quoting the archived discussion\\\"Lots of Villains of all alignments have no motive whatsoever. A LawfulEvil Villain being motivated by his hatred of freedom, a NeutralEvil being pure hedonists . It isn\\\'t specific enough to ChaoticEvil.\\\" And this is mentioned in the page enphasis before of the examples:
\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'It should be clarified Chaotic Evil does not mean the most evil or [[LawfulStupidChaoticStupid stupid]], in it ForTheEvulz (it can be a motivation to any villain of any evil alignment), nor even psychotic. Do not simply put a character here with the logic he\\\'s really evil, [[StupidEvil stupid]] or [[AxCrazy crazy]]. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"
In either case i am reputting Arthur Burns, ok?
\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'It should be clarified Chaotic Evil does not mean the most evil or [[LawfulStupidChaoticStupid stupid]], in it ForTheEvulz (it can be a motivation to any villain of any evil alignment), nor even psychotic. Do not simply put a character here with the logic he\\\'s really evil, [[StupidEvil stupid]] or [[AxCrazy crazy]]. \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"
In either case i am reputting Arthur Burns, ok?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, in this i agree with the mysterious vandal. Quoting the archived discussion\
to:
Well, in this i agree with the mysterious vandal. Quoting the archived discussion\\\"Lots of Villains of all alignments have no motive whatsoever. A LawfulEvil Villain being motivated by his hatred of freedom, a NeutralEvil being pure hedonists . It isn\\\'t specific enough to ChaoticEvil.\\\" And this is mentioned in the page enphasis:
\\\'\\\'\\\'It should be clarified Chaotic Evil does not mean the most evil or [[LawfulStupidChaoticStupid stupid]], in it ForTheEvulz (it can be a motivation to any villain of any evil alignment), nor even psychotic. Do not simply put a character here with the logic he\\\'s really evil, [[StupidEvil stupid]] or [[AxCrazy crazy]]. \\\'\\\'\\\' In either case i am reputting Arthur Burns, ok?
\\\'\\\'\\\'It should be clarified Chaotic Evil does not mean the most evil or [[LawfulStupidChaoticStupid stupid]], in it ForTheEvulz (it can be a motivation to any villain of any evil alignment), nor even psychotic. Do not simply put a character here with the logic he\\\'s really evil, [[StupidEvil stupid]] or [[AxCrazy crazy]]. \\\'\\\'\\\' In either case i am reputting Arthur Burns, ok?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, in this i agree with the mysterious vandal. Quoting the archived discussion\
to:
Well, in this i agree with the mysterious vandal. Quoting the archived discussion\\\"Lots of Villains of all alignments have no motive whatsoever. A LawfulEvil Villain being motivated by his hatred of freedom, a NeutralEvil being pure hedonists . It isn\\\'t specific enough to ChaoticEvil.\\\" In either case i am reputting Arthur Burns, ok?
