[003]
rodneyAnonymous
Current Version
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
-- \
to:
--\\\"original\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty.\\\'\\\'
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since it\\\'s about the arrival of \\\'\\\'His\\\'\\\' (or Her) Majesty.\\\'\\\'
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}} (crufty)
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since it\\\'s about the arrival of the Regent.\\\'\\\'
--Tropers/FastEddie
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since the first were about heralding the arrival of \\\'\\\'His\\\'\\\' Majesty, or \\\'\\\'Her\\\'\\\' Majesty.\\\'\\\'
--Tropers/DragonQuestZ \\\"That loses the point of the sentence mentioning \\\"majesty\\\" in the first place.\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to quantify, the piece must sound majestic (after all, originally fanfare heralded the arrival of \\\'\\\'your Majesty\\\'\\\').\\\'\\\'
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}} \\\"lol, how\\\'s this? (although the third criterium seems redundant to the second... should it be \\\"always consists of these two elements\\\", with #2 and #3 merged?)\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to quantify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty. Fitting, since it would likely herald the arrival of someone you would address as \\\"Your Majesty\\\".\\\'\\\'
--Tropers/DragonQuestZ \\\"The repetition of \\\"Majesty\\\" is to emphasize the point. Changing even part of it loses that.\\\"
\\\"strongly disagree, majestic>majesty is better style than majesty>majesty, but communicates the same thing with the same emphasis... leaving it, tho... this is totally broken by too much fixing :) it is unclear how #3 is different than #2, should either be significantly reworded, or deleted\\\"
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}
\\\"\\\"stirring\\\" doesn\\\'t necessarily lead to a feeling of majesty.\\\"
--Tropers/DragonQuestZ
\\\"No one said they were the same, just very similar. The difference should be clarified, probably by drastic rewording; or if they aren\\\'t significantly different, they should be merged. I don\\\'t understand the definition well enough to make that decision.\\\"
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty.\\\'\\\'
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since it\\\'s about the arrival of \\\'\\\'His\\\'\\\' (or Her) Majesty.\\\'\\\'
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}} (crufty)
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since it\\\'s about the arrival of the Regent.\\\'\\\'
--Tropers/FastEddie
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since the first were about heralding the arrival of \\\'\\\'His\\\'\\\' Majesty, or \\\'\\\'Her\\\'\\\' Majesty.\\\'\\\'
--Tropers/DragonQuestZ \\\"That loses the point of the sentence mentioning \\\"majesty\\\" in the first place.\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to quantify, the piece must sound majestic (after all, originally fanfare heralded the arrival of \\\'\\\'your Majesty\\\'\\\').\\\'\\\'
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}} \\\"lol, how\\\'s this? (although the third criterium seems redundant to the second... should it be \\\"always consists of these two elements\\\", with #2 and #3 merged?)\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to quantify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty. Fitting, since it would likely herald the arrival of someone you would address as \\\"Your Majesty\\\".\\\'\\\'
--Tropers/DragonQuestZ \\\"The repetition of \\\"Majesty\\\" is to emphasize the point. Changing even part of it loses that.\\\"
\\\"strongly disagree, majestic>majesty is better style than majesty>majesty, but communicates the same thing with the same emphasis... leaving it, tho... this is totally broken by too much fixing :) it is unclear how #3 is different than #2, should either be significantly reworded, or deleted\\\"
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}
\\\"\\\"stirring\\\" doesn\\\'t necessarily lead to a feeling of majesty.\\\"
--Tropers/DragonQuestZ
\\\"No one said they were the same, just very similar. The difference should be clarified, probably by drastic rewording; or if they aren\\\'t significantly different, they should be merged. I don\\\'t understand the definition well enough to make that decision.\\\"
--{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
fanfare criteria (swiped from edit history):
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\'fanfare criteria (swiped from edit history):\\\'\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
-- \
to:
-- \\\"original\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty.\\\'\\\'
-- {{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since it\\\'s about the arrival of \\\'\\\'His\\\'\\\' (or Her) Majesty.\\\'\\\'
-- [[{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}]] (crufty)
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since it\\\'s about the arrival of the Regent.\\\'\\\'
-- [[Tropers/FastEddie]]
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since the first were about heralding the arrival of \\\'\\\'His\\\'\\\' Majesty, or \\\'\\\'Her\\\'\\\' Majesty.\\\'\\\'
--[[Tropers/DragonQuestZ]] \\\"That loses the point of the sentence mentioning \\\"majesty\\\" in the first place.\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to quantify, the piece must sound majestic (after all, originally fanfare heralded the arrival of \\\'\\\'your Majesty\\\'\\\').\\\'\\\'
-- [[{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}]] \\\"lol, how\\\'s this? (although the third criterium seems redundant to the second... should it be \\\"always consists of these two elements\\\", with #2 and #3 merged?)\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to quantify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty. Fitting, since it would likely herald the arrival of someone you would address as \\\"Your Majesty\\\".\\\'\\\'
--[[Tropers/DragonQuestZ]] \\\"The repetition of \\\"Majesty\\\" is to emphasize the point. Changing even part of it loses that.\\\"
\\\"strongly disagree, majestic>majesty is better style than majesty>majesty, but communicates the same thing with the same emphasis... leaving it, tho... this is totally broken by too much fixing :) it is unclear how #3 is different than #2, should either be significantly reworded, or deleted\\\"
-- [[{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}]]
\\\"\\\"stirring\\\" doesn\\\'t necessarily lead to a feeling of majesty.\\\"
--[[Tropers/DragonQuestZ]]
\\\"No one said they were the same, just very similar. The difference should be clarified, probably by drastic rewording; or if they aren\\\'t significantly different, they should be merged. I don\\\'t understand the definition well enough to make that decision.\\\"
-- [[{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}]]
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty.\\\'\\\'
-- {{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since it\\\'s about the arrival of \\\'\\\'His\\\'\\\' (or Her) Majesty.\\\'\\\'
-- [[{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}]] (crufty)
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since it\\\'s about the arrival of the Regent.\\\'\\\'
-- [[Tropers/FastEddie]]
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to truly qualify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty, since the first were about heralding the arrival of \\\'\\\'His\\\'\\\' Majesty, or \\\'\\\'Her\\\'\\\' Majesty.\\\'\\\'
--[[Tropers/DragonQuestZ]] \\\"That loses the point of the sentence mentioning \\\"majesty\\\" in the first place.\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to quantify, the piece must sound majestic (after all, originally fanfare heralded the arrival of \\\'\\\'your Majesty\\\'\\\').\\\'\\\'
-- [[{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}]] \\\"lol, how\\\'s this? (although the third criterium seems redundant to the second... should it be \\\"always consists of these two elements\\\", with #2 and #3 merged?)\\\"
\\\'\\\'Although it is hard to quantify, the piece must instill a sense of majesty. Fitting, since it would likely herald the arrival of someone you would address as \\\"Your Majesty\\\".\\\'\\\'
--[[Tropers/DragonQuestZ]] \\\"The repetition of \\\"Majesty\\\" is to emphasize the point. Changing even part of it loses that.\\\"
\\\"strongly disagree, majestic>majesty is better style than majesty>majesty, but communicates the same thing with the same emphasis... leaving it, tho... this is totally broken by too much fixing :) it is unclear how #3 is different than #2, should either be significantly reworded, or deleted\\\"
-- [[{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}]]
\\\"\\\"stirring\\\" doesn\\\'t necessarily lead to a feeling of majesty.\\\"
--[[Tropers/DragonQuestZ]]
\\\"No one said they were the same, just very similar. The difference should be clarified, probably by drastic rewording; or if they aren\\\'t significantly different, they should be merged. I don\\\'t understand the definition well enough to make that decision.\\\"
-- [[{{Tropers/rodneyAnonymous}}]]
