Discussion History Literature / Dracula

Then we should also remove the \\\"top 10%\\\" definition, and replace it with something unpretentious like \\\"stories recommended by tropers\\\", as this othervise does declare a notability issue, and removing the guideline that a story has to have \\\'\\\'something whatsoever\\\'\\\' speaking for it, and isn\\\'t a 5-minute bigoted hatefic, means that the page has no standards or reliability or point whatsoever, could just as well be replaced with a link to the entire fanfiction.net Ranma index, and simply turns to temporary account-, or cover identity-, self-promotion... which is fine, if that is all we want the page to be and are openly honest about it, but if we do state that the page does have any standards whatsoever, then there should be some form of sifting and guidelines present.

I have now made an effort to write up something sensible, that won\\\'t be found offensive or pretentious. If you have specific problems with the phrasing feel free to bring it up and suggest alternatives. Well, either that or we really do remove \\\'\\\'\\\'all\\\'\\\'\\\' of it beyond the recommendations themselves, not just my text (and thus including the \\\"10 %\\\" sticking point).

Then we should also remove the \\\"top 10%\\\" definition, and replace it with something unpretentious like \\\"stories recommended by tropers\\\", as this othervise does declare a notability issue, and removing the guideline that a story has to have _something wahtsoever_ speaking for it, and isn\\\'t a 5-minute bigoted hatefic, means that the page has no standards or reliability or point whatsoever, could just as well be replaced with a link to the entire fanfiction.net Ranma index, and simply turns to temporary account-, or cover identity-, self-promotion... which is fine, if that is all you want the page to be and we are openly honest about it, but if we do state that the page does have any standards whatsoever, then there should be some form of sifting and guidelines present.

I have now made an effort to write up something sensible, that won\\\'t be found offensive or pretentious. If you have specific problems with the phrasing feel free to bring it up and suggest alternatives.

Then we should also remove the \\\"top 10%\\\" definition, and replace it with something unpretentious like \\\"stories recommended by tropers\\\", as this othervise does declare a notability issue, and removing the guideline that a story has to have _something wahtsoever_ speaking for it, and isn\\\'t a 5-minute bigoted hatefic, means that the page has no standards or reliability or point whatsoever, could just as well be replaced with a link to the entire fanfiction.net Ranma index, and simply turns to temporary account self-promotion... which is fine, if that is all you want the page to be, but if we state that the page does have any standards whatsoever, then there should be some form of sifting and guidelines present.

I have now made an effort to write up something sensible, that won\\\'t be found offensive or pretentious. If you have specific problems with the phrasing feel free to bring it up and suggest alternatives.