[003]
Wilben
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In that case, I think it\'s fine to keep those kind of examples where they are, as none of the member\'s solo content is very tropable by themselves to justify their own pages. Though it\'s probably best to mainly stick with videos pertaining to the whole group, as to avoid having too many examples from a solo member\'s content, to which they would need their own page at that point.
to:
In that case, I think it\\\'s fine to keep those kind of examples where they are, as none of the member\\\'s solo content is very tropable by themselves to justify their own pages. Though it\\\'s probably best to mainly stick with videos pertaining to the whole group to avoid having too many examples from a solo member\\\'s content, as they would need their own page at that point.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In that case, I think it\'s fine to keep those kind of examples where they are, as none of the member\'s solo content is very tropable by themselves to justify their own pages. Though it\'s probably best to mainly stick with videos pertaining to the whole group, as to avoid having too many examples from a solo member\'s content.
to:
In that case, I think it\\\'s fine to keep those kind of examples where they are, as none of the member\\\'s solo content is very tropable by themselves to justify their own pages. Though it\\\'s probably best to mainly stick with videos pertaining to the whole group, as to avoid having too many examples from a solo member\\\'s content, to which they would need their own page at that point.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
* A weird, highly specific minor point of controversy in the fourth season was the age gap between Chrissy and Eddie, which per WordOfGod and the characters\' own dialogue indicated Chrissy was 17/18 and Eddie was 19/20. In [[StrangerThingsS4E3ChapterThreeTheMonsterAndTheSuperhero the third episode of the season]], a blink-and-you\'ll-miss-it shot of Chrissy\'s information in the counsellors office indicates her date-of-birth and year of enrolment provide contrasting information, indicating she was only 15 (and thus a freshmen) but also stated she enrolled four years prior (and thus should have been a senior). Despite this being just a prop that had evidently not been fact-checked or proof-read, some latched onto this information to indicate Chrissy was a freshmen and thus made the ShipTease with Eddie {{Squick}} due to him being possibly an adult and her barely a teenager. Adding further to this, the last episode showed a missing poster for Eddie which indicated he was 17; despite this being further evidence that \'\'Stranger Things\'\' didn\'t proof-check their props, it caused further discourse as this now indicates Eddie was also a senior at oldest, despite his dialogue indicating he\'d been held back two years.
to:
* A weird, highly specific minor point of controversy in the fourth season was the age gap between Chrissy and Eddie, which per WordOfGod and the characters\\\' own dialogue indicated Chrissy was 17/18 and Eddie was 19/20. In [[Recap/StrangerThingsS4E3ChapterThreeTheMonsterAndTheSuperhero the third episode of the season]], a blink-and-you\\\'ll-miss-it shot of Chrissy\\\'s information in the counsellors office indicates her date-of-birth and year of enrolment provide contrasting information, indicating she was only 15 (and thus a freshmen) but also stated she enrolled four years prior (and thus should have been a senior). Despite this being just a prop that had evidently not been fact-checked or proof-read, some latched onto this information to indicate Chrissy was a freshmen and thus made the ShipTease with Eddie {{Squick}} due to him being possibly an adult and her barely a teenager. Adding further to this, the last episode showed a missing poster for Eddie which indicated he was 17; despite this being further evidence that \\\'\\\'Stranger Things\\\'\\\' didn\\\'t proof-check their props, it caused further discourse as this now indicates Eddie was also a senior at oldest, despite his dialogue indicating he\\\'d been held back two years.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I thought maybe CommonKnowledge, because its based on viewers recalling information that was incorrect (IE, \
to:
I thought maybe CommonKnowledge, because its based on viewers recalling information that was incorrect (IE, \\\"Chrissy was a freshmen\\\"), but that usually infers it\\\'s people who don\\\'t follow the work closely largely believe something false whereas here its people following the work \\\'\\\'too closely\\\'\\\' and getting false information because the work\\\'s creators didn\\\'t proof-read.
