Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History WMG / Naruto

Go To

[004] SensuBean Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Heck, I\'ve even deliberately avoided including my own (overkill ambitious) story, since I don\'t think it at all measures up to the real masterpieces. This despite that it actually does hold an awful lot higher writing quality than some of the other current inclusions. Rowan Seven said that it \
to:
Heck, I\\\'ve even deliberately avoided including [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Tropers/Antvasima my own (overkill ambitious) story]], since I don\\\'t think it at all measures up to the real masterpieces. This despite that it actually does hold an awful lot higher writing quality than some of the other current inclusions. Rowan Seven said that it \\\"switches rapidly between brilliant and mediocre\\\" and \\\"is incredibly coherent considering how ridiculously much you wanted to say, but not so much othervise\\\" which I suppose is the most accurate description that I\\\'ve heard yet.

Anyway, I\\\'m sure some petty and manipulative fellow could completely misrepresent the situation to Eddie, who has too much to do to be able to afford enough time to thoroughly check into the matter (it\\\'s probably extremely hard to run this type of vast site almost by oneself on top of very advanced real programming work) but I\\\'d go into complete CognitiveDissonance seisure if I started to attempt to accommodate for \\\"Choose A or B: Either will get you banned!\\\" I need clearer specifics than that.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
That doesn\'t make sense according to my information/experience (which admittedly isn\'t much). As far as I know Fast Eddie actively encourages people to cut out irrelevance and gives partial bans for putting back deleted columns, so that\'s the guideline that I\'m trying to follow now.
to:
That doesn\\\'t make sense according to my information/experience (which admittedly isn\\\'t much). As far as I know Fast Eddie actively encourages people to cut out irrelevance and gives partial bans for putting back deleted columns, so that\\\'s the guideline that I\\\'m trying to follow now. Or at least that\\\'s what I have to go on. If I\\\'m corrected and someone explains the distinction I will go with that instead.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
In this case it is entirely warranted to remove the recommendations, or we make an argument that I can copy-past a few hundred random Ranma fics onto this page, as the majority would probably be much better. It makes no sense whatsoever to allow their inclusion.
to:
In this case it is entirely warranted to remove the recommendations, or we literally make an argument that I can copy-past a few hundred random Ranma fics onto this page, as the majority would probably be much better. It makes no sense whatsoever to allow their inclusion.

Heck, I\\\'ve even deliberately avoided including my own (overkill ambitious) story, since I don\\\'t think it at all measures up to the real masterpieces. This despite that it actually does hold an awful lot higher writing quality than some of the other current inclusions. Rowan Seven said that it \\\"switches rapidly between brilliant and mediocre\\\" and \\\"is incredibly coherent considering how ridiculously much you wanted to say, but not so much othervise\\\" which I suppose is the most accurate description that I\\\'ve heard yet.

Anyway, I\\\'m sure some petty and manipulative fellow could completely misrepresent the situation to Eddie, who has too much to do to be able to afford enough time to thoroughly check into the matter (it\\\'s probably extremely hard to run this type of vast site almost by oneself on top of very advanced real programming work) but I\\\'d go into complete CognitiveDissonance seisure if I started to attempt to accommodate for \\\"Choose A or B: Either will get you banned!\\\" I need clearer specifics than that.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
That doesn\'t make sense according to my information/experience. As far as I know Fast Eddie actively encourages people to cut out irrelevance and gives bans for putting back deleted columns.
to:
That doesn\\\'t make sense according to my information/experience (which admittedly isn\\\'t much). As far as I know Fast Eddie actively encourages people to cut out irrelevance and gives partial bans for putting back deleted columns, so that\\\'s the guideline that I\\\'m trying to follow now.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
That doesn\'t make sense according to my information/experience. AfaIk FastEddie actively encourages people who cut out irrelevance and give bans for putting back deleted columns.
to:
That doesn\\\'t make sense according to my information/experience. As far as I know Fast Eddie actively encourages people to cut out irrelevance and gives bans for putting back deleted columns.

In this case it is entirely warranted to remove the recommendations, or we make an argument that I can copy-past a few hundred random Ranma fics onto this page, as the majority would probably be much better. It makes no sense whatsoever to allow their inclusion.
Top