[001]
KillerClowns
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I don\'t believe the locking was necessary. For instance, after some discussion, I put a comment on the [[Characters/MassEffect Mass Effect Character Sheet]] basically saying \
to:
I don\\\'t believe the locking was necessary. For instance, after some discussion, I put a comment on the [[Characters/MassEffect Mass Effect Character Sheet]] basically saying \\\"no calling ordinary party members {{Ensemble Darkhorse}}s, see discussion for reasoning.\\\" Never had a problem since.
Try it. I know we aren\\\'t perfect, but trust your misbegotten flock. Unlock the page, then place a comment at the page\\\'s top saying, \\\"no reversing the order of this page as an in-joke, it\\\'s frustrating for those unfamiliar with the work and serves no useful purpose. Please see discussion page if you wish to discuss this.\\\" Expand on your reasoning in this discussion page, even if it\\\'s a verbose version of \\\"in-jokes suck.\\\" There will be some discussion, some idiotic bitching, at worst an Edit War... but at the end of the day, most people will shrug and say, \\\"fair enough.\\\" If it gets too frustrating, and people prove to be more imbecilic than I expect, you can always just re-lock the page.
Try it. I know we aren\\\'t perfect, but trust your misbegotten flock. Unlock the page, then place a comment at the page\\\'s top saying, \\\"no reversing the order of this page as an in-joke, it\\\'s frustrating for those unfamiliar with the work and serves no useful purpose. Please see discussion page if you wish to discuss this.\\\" Expand on your reasoning in this discussion page, even if it\\\'s a verbose version of \\\"in-jokes suck.\\\" There will be some discussion, some idiotic bitching, at worst an Edit War... but at the end of the day, most people will shrug and say, \\\"fair enough.\\\" If it gets too frustrating, and people prove to be more imbecilic than I expect, you can always just re-lock the page.
