[004]
Arivne
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The following Literature example has been deleted. It\'s not about naturally occurring cut/faceted/polished gems, so it\'s Administrivia/NotAnExample of the trope.
to:
The following straight Literature example has been deleted. It\\\'s not about naturally occurring cut/faceted/polished gems, so it\\\'s Administrivia/NotAnExample of the trope.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The following Literature example has been deleted. It\'s not about naturally occurring cut/faceted/polished gems, so it\'s NotAnExample of the trope.
to:
The following Literature example has been deleted. It\\\'s not about naturally occurring cut/faceted/polished gems, so it\\\'s Administrivia/NotAnExample of the trope.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
None of your links are working, and the argument never was that he didn\'t become bad in Part 4, the argument is that his contributions in Parts 1 and 3 way outweigh what the vast majority of the cast can do for you in the entire game, so people generally don\'t begrudge him anymore like they used to for how much he falls off in Part 4, and so he has been consistently getting ranked as a high or top tier character for his overall contribution for years now. Plus as is, most units are bad at some point, whether it be when they start out, in an awkward middle period where there\'s a spike in enemy quality and they\'re stuck underlevelled or unable to promote, or at the end of the game when stat and class limitations hold them back, Sothe isn\'t unique in this regard for being bad for one part of the game(and realizing this is a big part of why Jagens like Sothe became a lot more popular and highly regarded within the community). How can one still be considered a \
to:
None of your links are working, and the argument never was that he didn\\\'t become bad in Part 4, the argument is that his contributions in Parts 1 and 3 way outweigh what the vast majority of the cast can do for you in the entire game, so people generally don\\\'t begrudge him anymore like they used to for how much he falls off in Part 4, and so he has been consistently getting ranked as a high or top tier character for his overall contribution for years now. Plus as is, most units are bad at some point, whether it be when they start out, in an awkward middle period where there\\\'s a spike in enemy quality and they\\\'re stuck underlevelled or unable to promote, or at the end of the game when stat and class limitations hold them back, Sothe isn\\\'t unique in this regard for being bad for one part of the game (and realizing this is a big part of why Jagens like Sothe became a lot more popular and highly regarded within the community). How can one still be considered a \\\"low tier scrappy\\\" if they keep getting ranked so highly and he doesn\\\'t really get hate anymore for his Part 4 performance?
\\\"You cannot say that the ENTIRE community has changed their views, that is impossible to say.\\\"
It\\\'s not a matter of \\\"absolutely everyone has to agree\\\", or else you could claim whatever you want on these pages without contention and fill it up with pointless bloat (e.g. the Fiona example I gave on the prior page), showing that a majority shares a view is enough, and showing community tier lists is about as strong as evidence you can show for what a majority thinks of a unit\\\'s overall performance.
\\\"You cannot say that the ENTIRE community has changed their views, that is impossible to say.\\\"
It\\\'s not a matter of \\\"absolutely everyone has to agree\\\", or else you could claim whatever you want on these pages without contention and fill it up with pointless bloat (e.g. the Fiona example I gave on the prior page), showing that a majority shares a view is enough, and showing community tier lists is about as strong as evidence you can show for what a majority thinks of a unit\\\'s overall performance.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
None of your links are working, and the argument never was that he didn\'t became bad in Part 4, the argument is that his contributions in Parts 1 and 3 way outweigh what the vast majority of the cast can do for you in the entire game, so people generally don\'t begrudge him anymore like they used to for how much he falls off in Part 4, and so he has been consistently getting ranked as a high or top tier character for his overall contribution for years now. Plus as is, most units are bad at some point, whether it be when they start out, in an awkward middle period where there\'s a spike in enemy quality and they\'re stuck underlevelled or unable to promote, or at the end of the game when stat and class limitations hold them back, Sothe isn\'t unique in this regard for being bad for one part of the game(and realizing this is a big part of why Jagens like Sothe became a lot more popular and highly regarded within the community). How can one still be considered a \
to:
None of your links are working, and the argument never was that he didn\\\'t become bad in Part 4, the argument is that his contributions in Parts 1 and 3 way outweigh what the vast majority of the cast can do for you in the entire game, so people generally don\\\'t begrudge him anymore like they used to for how much he falls off in Part 4, and so he has been consistently getting ranked as a high or top tier character for his overall contribution for years now. Plus as is, most units are bad at some point, whether it be when they start out, in an awkward middle period where there\\\'s a spike in enemy quality and they\\\'re stuck underlevelled or unable to promote, or at the end of the game when stat and class limitations hold them back, Sothe isn\\\'t unique in this regard for being bad for one part of the game(and realizing this is a big part of why Jagens like Sothe became a lot more popular and highly regarded within the community). How can one still be considered a \\\"low tier scrappy\\\" if they keep getting ranked so highly and he doesn\\\'t really get hate anymore for his Part 4 performance?
\\\"You cannot say that the ENTIRE community has changed their views, that is impossible to say.\\\"
It\\\'s not a matter of \\\"absolutely everyone has to agree\\\", or else you could claim whatever you want on these pages without contention and fill it up with pointless bloat (e.g. the Fiona example I gave on the prior page), showing that a majority shares a view is enough, and showing community tier lists is about as strong as evidence you can show for what a majority thinks of a unit\\\'s overall performance.
\\\"You cannot say that the ENTIRE community has changed their views, that is impossible to say.\\\"
It\\\'s not a matter of \\\"absolutely everyone has to agree\\\", or else you could claim whatever you want on these pages without contention and fill it up with pointless bloat (e.g. the Fiona example I gave on the prior page), showing that a majority shares a view is enough, and showing community tier lists is about as strong as evidence you can show for what a majority thinks of a unit\\\'s overall performance.
