[003]
NubianSatyress
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\" Nubian Satyress\\\\\\\'s position throughout has been voiced as \\\\\\\"You are wrong, I am right, and this is indisputable\\\\\\\" about how to interpret what occurs in the story, then shouting down anyone who presents a counterargument, then claiming people are misrepresenting their position about the fan reaction question when they have actually focused their arguments on story interpretation. If that was not what they intended to focus on, it was not expressed clearly.\\\"
The only two things I said that are indisputable is whether or not Tyrion based the new system of government on Dany\\\'s wishes (he did) and whether or not some fans find it heartwarming (they do). The former is a fact that we are told within the story and the latter is evident in how divided the reaction to the character is. Any further interpretation of it I have staunchly said is mixed and equally valid. I think you\\\'re confusing what I said with TT and Tuvok, who have been trying to claim that either that never happened or that the only people who think it happened are Dany fans. Both of them have staunchly tried to argue that because of what she did in the end, that she was therefore completely disassociated from the new government being put in place.
That being said, I like your rewrite. I think it has room for improvement but it\\\'s well-written.
The only two things I said that are indisputable is whether or not Tyrion based the new system of government on Dany\\\'s wishes (he did) and whether or not some fans find it heartwarming (they do). The former is a fact that we are told within the story and the latter is evident in how divided the reaction to the character is. Any further interpretation of it I have staunchly said is mixed and equally valid. I think you\\\'re confusing what I said with TT and Tuvok, who have been trying to claim that either that never happened or that the only people who think it happened are Dany fans. Both of them have staunchly tried to argue that because of what she did in the end, that she was therefore completely disassociated from the new government being put in place.
That being said, I like your rewrite. I think it has room for improvement but it\\\'s well-written.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\" Nubian Satyress\\\\\\\'s position throughout has been voiced as \\\\\\\"You are wrong, I am right, and this is indisputable\\\\\\\" about how to interpret what occurs in the story, then shouting down anyone who presents a counterargument, then claiming people are misrepresenting their position about the fan reaction question when they have actually focused their arguments on story interpretation. If that was not what they intended to focus on, it was not expressed clearly.\\\"
The only two things I said that are indisputable is whether or not Tyrion based the new system of government on Dany\\\'s wishes (he did) and whether or not some fans find it heartwarming (they do). THAT is a fact that we are told within the story. Any further interpretation of it I have staunchly said is mixed and equally valid. I think you\\\'re confusing what I said with TT and Tuvok, who have been trying to claim that either that never happened or that the only people who think it happened are Dany fans.
That being said, I like your rewrite. I think it has room for improvement but it\\\'s well-written.
The only two things I said that are indisputable is whether or not Tyrion based the new system of government on Dany\\\'s wishes (he did) and whether or not some fans find it heartwarming (they do). THAT is a fact that we are told within the story. Any further interpretation of it I have staunchly said is mixed and equally valid. I think you\\\'re confusing what I said with TT and Tuvok, who have been trying to claim that either that never happened or that the only people who think it happened are Dany fans.
That being said, I like your rewrite. I think it has room for improvement but it\\\'s well-written.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\" Nubian Satyress\\\\\\\'s position throughout has been voiced as \\\\\\\"You are wrong, I am right, and this is indisputable\\\\\\\" about how to interpret what occurs in the story, then shouting down anyone who presents a counterargument, then claiming people are misrepresenting their position about the fan reaction question when they have actually focused their arguments on story interpretation. If that was not what they intended to focus on, it was not expressed clearly.\\\"
The only thing I said that is indisputable is whether or not Tyrion based the new system of government on Dany\\\'s wishes. He did. THAT is a fact that we are told within the story. Any further interpretation of it I have staunchly said is mixed and equally valid. I think you\\\'re confusing what I said with TT and Tuvok, who have been trying to claim that either that never happened or that the only people who think it happened are Dany fans.
That being said, I like your rewrite. I think it has room for improvement but it\\\'s well-written.
The only thing I said that is indisputable is whether or not Tyrion based the new system of government on Dany\\\'s wishes. He did. THAT is a fact that we are told within the story. Any further interpretation of it I have staunchly said is mixed and equally valid. I think you\\\'re confusing what I said with TT and Tuvok, who have been trying to claim that either that never happened or that the only people who think it happened are Dany fans.
That being said, I like your rewrite. I think it has room for improvement but it\\\'s well-written.
