Discussion History Main / Asexuality

Alright, I have a bit of a problem with the \\\"Word of God/Saint Paul\\\" entries. While some of them elaborate upon why said character is asexual, then tell us that it was confirmed by writer/director/actor, etc., some are simply \\\"character x was confirmed to be this by y\\\". Not only does this dangerously approach ZeroContextExample, it seems like a way to win \\\"brownie\\\" points by claiming that your character is from a given sexuality without ever actually showing us \\\'\\\'why\\\'\\\' that character can be considered asexual.

I thought about deleting all the examples, but I would rather wait until people familiar with the works in question added some explanation as for why the entries apply.

Also sorry for replying to the first discussion, didn\\\'t notice that I was doing that.