[002]
DaibhidC
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m not sure I get the logic that Peter himself is absent from Disney\'s \'\'Peter Pan\'\' derivative media because he\'s \
to:
I\\\'m not sure I get the logic that Peter himself is absent from Disney\\\'s \\\'\\\'Peter Pan\\\'\\\' derivative media because he\\\'s \\\"(mostly) a PublicDomainCharacter\\\". Most of the Disney Princesses are Public Domain Characters. I\\\'d have thought it was more likely that Disney\\\'s problem is that \\\"mostly\\\"; he\\\'s not \\\'\\\'quite\\\'\\\' a public domain character in the UK, and they\\\'re not the copyright holder. But I\\\'d have thought that also applies to other characters like Tink and Hook, so I don\\\'t know.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m not sure I get the logic that Peter himself is absent from Disney\'s \'\'Peter Pan\'\' derivative media because he\'s \
to:
I\\\'m not sure I get the logic that Peter himself is absent from Disney\\\'s \\\'\\\'Peter Pan\\\'\\\' derivative media because he\\\'s \\\"(mostly) a PublicDomainCharacter. Most of the Disney Princesses are Public Domain Characters. I\\\'d have thought it was more likely that Disney\\\'s problem is that \\\"mostly\\\"; he\\\'s not \\\'\\\'quite\\\'\\\' a public domain character in the UK, and they\\\'re not the copyright holder. But I\\\'d have thought that also applies to Tink and Hook, so I don\\\'t know.
