[001]
rva98014
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Matt Damon\'s listing depends on the intention of Creative Team. If he was hired specifically to be Loki-in-Play because of his earlier \
to:
Matt Damon\\\'s listing depends on the intention of the Creative Team. If he was hired specifically to be Loki-in-Play because of his earlier \\\"Loki\\\" role then it\\\'s a Casting Gag. If he was hired for any other reason, then it\\\'s more an Actor Allusion.
Unless we know the exact reason he was hired, just having Matt only under Actor Allusion is the safest.
Jeff Goldblum is interesting because Taika is saying he intentionally did not want to do a shoutout to \\\"Earth Girls are easy.\\\"
Trying to classify it as an inversion of an enforced trope seems to be overly complicating the issue. I think it would safely fall under Actor Allusion because Taika is acknowledging Goldblum\\\'s previous role and actually made a decision about character makeup to avoid an intentional shout-out.
I\\\'d just change the wording from \\\"Defied with Jeff Goldblum.\\\" to \\\"An interesting case with Jeff Goldblum.\\\"
Unless we know the exact reason he was hired, just having Matt only under Actor Allusion is the safest.
Jeff Goldblum is interesting because Taika is saying he intentionally did not want to do a shoutout to \\\"Earth Girls are easy.\\\"
Trying to classify it as an inversion of an enforced trope seems to be overly complicating the issue. I think it would safely fall under Actor Allusion because Taika is acknowledging Goldblum\\\'s previous role and actually made a decision about character makeup to avoid an intentional shout-out.
I\\\'d just change the wording from \\\"Defied with Jeff Goldblum.\\\" to \\\"An interesting case with Jeff Goldblum.\\\"
