Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Film / HeartOfDarkness1958

Go To

[008] Cracktopus Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15516466590A65065400&page=1#comment-1 This forum post]] explains my reasons for launching \'\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\'\' in the Film rather than the Recap namespace (in short: there will probably never be any other recaps to keep it company). As I wrote there, taxonomizing a movie-length anthology episode
to:
[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15516466590A65065400 This forum post]] explains my reasons for launching \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' in the Film rather than the Recap namespace (in short: there will probably never be any other recaps to keep it company). As I wrote there, taxonomizing a movie-length anthology episode
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, both \'\'this is an episode\'\' and \'\'this is a movie\'\' are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes (especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \'\'Series/Playhouse90\'\' itself), but since I have put \'\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\'\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \'\'it\'\' as a movie.
to:
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, both \\\'\\\'this is an episode\\\'\\\' and \\\'\\\'this is a movie\\\'\\\' are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes (especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' page itself), but since I have put \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \\\'\\\'it\\\'\\\' as a movie.
Changed line(s) 6 from:
n
Anyway, I have made the choice to treat episodes discussed on the \'\'Series/Playhouse90\'\' page as episodes, with their titles in quotes, while treating \'\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\'\' -- now the one episode that has its own page[[note]]as opposed to being covered briefly on the page of a later adaptation, like \'\'Film/RequiemForAHeavyweight\'\'[[/note]] -- as a film, with its title in italics, when it it mentioned elsewhere on the wiki.
to:
Anyway, I have made the choice to treat episodes discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' page as episodes, with their titles in quotes, while treating \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' -- now the one episode that has its own page (as opposed to being covered briefly on the page of a later adaptation, like \\\'\\\'Film/RequiemForAHeavyweight\\\'\\\') -- as a film, with its title in italics, when it it mentioned elsewhere on the wiki.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, both \'\'this is an episode\'\' and \'\'this is a movie\'\' are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes[[note]]especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \'\'Series/Playhouse90\'\' itself[[/note]], but since I have put \'\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\'\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \'\'it\'\' as a movie.
to:
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, both \\\'\\\'this is an episode\\\'\\\' and \\\'\\\'this is a movie\\\'\\\' are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes (especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' itself), but since I have put \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \\\'\\\'it\\\'\\\' as a movie.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \'\'both\'\' \
to:
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, both \\\'\\\'this is an episode\\\'\\\' and \\\'\\\'this is a movie\\\'\\\' are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes[[note]]especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' itself[[/note]], but since I have put \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \\\'\\\'it\\\'\\\' as a movie.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Posting here because I just want to be candid about a deliberately inconsistent formatting decision [=I\'ve=] made that relates to this page and \'\'Series/Playhouse90\'\'.
to:
Posting here because I just want to be candid about a deliberately inconsistent formatting decision I have made that relates to this page and \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15516466590A65065400&page=1#comment-1 This forum post]] explains my reasons for launching \'\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\'\' in the Film rather than the Recap namespace (in short: there aren\'t going to be any other recaps to keep it company). As I wrote there, taxonomizing a movie-length anthology episode
to:
[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15516466590A65065400&page=1#comment-1 This forum post]] explains my reasons for launching \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' in the Film rather than the Recap namespace (in short: there will probably never be any other recaps to keep it company). As I wrote there, taxonomizing a movie-length anthology episode
Changed line(s) 6 from:
n
Anyway, I\'ve made the choice to treat episodes discussed on the \'\'Series/Playhouse90\'\' page as episodes, with their titles in quotes, while treating \'\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\'\' -- now the one episode that has its own page[[note]]as opposed to being covered briefly on a later adaptation\'s page, like \'\'Film/RequiemForAHeavyweight\'\'[[/note]] -- as a film, with its title in italics, when it it mentioned elsewhere on the wiki.
to:
Anyway, I have made the choice to treat episodes discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' page as episodes, with their titles in quotes, while treating \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' -- now the one episode that has its own page[[note]]as opposed to being covered briefly on the page of a later adaptation, like \\\'\\\'Film/RequiemForAHeavyweight\\\'\\\'[[/note]] -- as a film, with its title in italics, when it it mentioned elsewhere on the wiki.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \'\'both\'\' \
to:
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' \\\"this is an episode\\\" \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' \\\"this is a movie\\\" are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes[[note]]especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' itself[[/note]], but since I have put \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \\\'\\\'it\\\'\\\' as a movie.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Posting here because I just want to be candid about a deliberately inconsistent formatting decision I\'ve made that relates to this page and \'\'Series/Playhouse90\'\'.
to:
Posting here because I just want to be candid about a deliberately inconsistent formatting decision [=I\\\'ve=] made that relates to this page and \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \'\'both\'\' \
to:
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' \\\"it\\\'s an episode\\\" \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' \\\"it\\\'s a movie\\\" are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes[[note]]especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' itself[[/note]], but since I\\\'ve put \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \\\'\\\'it\\\'\\\' as a movie.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \'\'both\'\' \
to:
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' \\\"it\\\'s an episode\\\" \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' \\\"it\\\'s a movie\\\" are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes[[note]]especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' itself[[/note]], but since I\\\'ve put \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \\\'\\\'it\\\'\\\' as a movie.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \'\'both\'\' \
to:
My reasoning for this is that, for any given episode of the series, \\\'\\\'both\\\'\\\' \\\"it\\\'s an episode\\\" \\\'\\\'and\\\'\\\' \\\"it\\\'s a movie\\\" are true statements. Episodes without their own pages seem easier to regard as episodes[[note]]especially since so far they are mostly discussed on the \\\'\\\'Series/Playhouse90\\\'\\\' itself[[/note]], but since I\\\'ve put \\\'\\\'Film/HeartOfDarkness1958\\\'\\\' on its own page where it is treated mostly on its own terms rather than in context of the series, it seems easier to regard \\\'\\\'it\\\'\\\' as a movie.
Top