Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Film / DudeWheresMyCar

Go To

[004] generalerror Current Version

19th Dec '18 at 09:44:21 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

Now am I missing something or is \

to:

Now am I missing something or is \\\"I refuse to let us go down in history as the dudes who destroyed the universe!\\\" NOT really an example for ComicallyMissingThePoint?

[003] NubianSatyress

27th Feb '18 at 12:59:04 PM

Changed line(s) 7 from:

n

[[quoteblock]]Killmonger ends up ‘liberating’ the artefact, which was stolen from Wakanda in the first place. It’s a visual representation of what so many former colonies are fighting for right now, and it’s an act that’s hard to disagree with it. But, in order to remind the audience that he’s supposed to be the bad guy, the scene ends with Killmonger and his crew murdering a bunch of people and then handing over the artefact to a white South African of all people, to sell to the highest bidder.[[/quote]]

to:

[[quoteblock]]Killmonger ends up ‘liberating’ the artefact, which was stolen from Wakanda in the first place. It’s a visual representation of what so many former colonies are fighting for right now, and it’s an act that’s hard to disagree with it. But, in order to remind the audience that he’s supposed to be the bad guy, the scene ends with Killmonger and his crew murdering a bunch of people and then handing over the artefact to a white South African of all people, to sell to the highest bidder.[[/quoteblock]]

Changed line(s) 13 from:

n

Killmonger is the type of villain where agreeing with his motives or reasoning is not misaimed. The film doesn't argue that he's wrong in either. It argues that he's wrong in the means he uses to achieve his ends, as well as his personal pettiness.

to:

Killmonger is the type of villain where agreeing with his motives or reasoning is not misaimed. The film doesn\'t argue that he\'s wrong in either. It argues that he\'s wrong in the means he uses to achieve his ends, as well as his personal pettiness.

[002] NubianSatyress

27th Feb '18 at 12:58:52 PM

Changed line(s) 7 from:

n

[[quoteblock]]However, the character is flawed. His irrationality, and propensity for violence are what make him a villain. That and the fact that his first act as King was to choke out an elderly woman and burn down ancient practices.[[/quoteblock]]

to:

[[quoteblock]]Killmonger ends up ‘liberating’ the artefact, which was stolen from Wakanda in the first place. It’s a visual representation of what so many former colonies are fighting for right now, and it’s an act that’s hard to disagree with it. But, in order to remind the audience that he’s supposed to be the bad guy, the scene ends with Killmonger and his crew murdering a bunch of people and then handing over the artefact to a white South African of all people, to sell to the highest bidder.[[/quote]]

And to quote the other:

[[quoteblock]]However, the character is flawed. His irrationality, and propensity for violence are what make him a villain. That and the fact that his first act as King was to choke out an elderly woman and burn down ancient practices.[[/quoteblock]]

Killmonger is the type of villain where agreeing with his motives or reasoning is not misaimed. The film doesn\'t argue that he\'s wrong in either. It argues that he\'s wrong in the means he uses to achieve his ends, as well as his personal pettiness.

[001] NubianSatyress

27th Feb '18 at 12:34:49 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

To start with, a bunch of randos on a Gamespot forum don’t strike me as a strong enough argument. As said elsewhere on this page, if you look hard enough, you’ll find ANYONE who sides with any villain.

to:

To start with, a bunch of randos on a GameFAQs forum don’t strike me as a strong enough argument. As said elsewhere on this page, if you look hard enough, you’ll find ANYONE who sides with any villain.

Top