[006]
Eagal
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Edit: I\'ve also removed accusations that Rowling believes \
to:
Edit: I\\\'ve also removed accusations that Rowling believes \\\"Asian are servants to white people\\\" and analysis of what respect Rowling possesses of Asian culture for the same reason.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
to:
Edit: I\\\'ve also removed accusations that Rowling believes \\\"Asian are servants to white people\\\" for the same reason.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In the interest of avoiding an edit war, I would like to propose to re-remove the accusation of Rowling being a bigot in the UnfortunateImplications example for two reasons. Firstly, we are meant to trope works, not people. Rowling\'s proposed bigotry is immaterial to the example, and secondly because none of the provided links actually accuse Rowling of being a bigot, as they too focus predominantly on Nagini\'s portrayal, with little comment on Rowling\'s motives.
to:
In the interest of avoiding an edit war, I would like to propose to re-remove the accusation of Rowling being a bigot in the UnfortunateImplications example for two reasons. Firstly and most importantly, we are meant to trope works, not people. Rowling\\\'s proposed bigotry is immaterial to the example, and secondly because none of the provided links actually accuse Rowling of being a bigot, as they too focus predominantly on Nagini\\\'s portrayal, with little comment on Rowling\\\'s motives.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Indeed, it usually is. However, looking at the scope of the tropes description and the inaccurate ideas presented in the removed entry, plus the fact that it wasn't presented on that tropes page, it seemed clear that it just wasn't a real example.
to:
Indeed, it usually is. However, looking at the scope of the tropes description and the inaccurate ideas presented in the removed entry, plus the fact that it wasn\'t presented on that tropes page, it seemed clear that it just wasn\'t a real example.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
However, I also would just like to point out that my idea for posting a discussion wasn't for the suggestion of the removal but rather so that people who might make a similar mistake have a reference for it in the future. But I do think you have a good point and perhaps I was being a bit hasty, but I still stand by how I handled it.
to:
However, I also would just like to point out that my idea for posting a discussion wasn\'t for the suggestion of the removal but rather so that people who might make a similar mistake have a reference for it in the future. But I do think you have a good point and perhaps I was being a bit hasty, but I still stand by how I handled it in this case, though I don\'t plan on making a habit of it. I prefer adding my insights over removing mistakes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Indeed, it usually is. However, looking at the scope of the tropes description and the inaccurate ideas presented here, plus the fact that it wasn't presented on the page, it seemed clear that it just wasn't a real example.
to:
Indeed, it usually is. However, looking at the scope of the tropes description and the inaccurate ideas presented in the removed entry, plus the fact that it wasn\'t presented on that tropes page, it seemed clear that it just wasn\'t a real example.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
However, I also would just like to point out that my idea for posting a discussion wasn't for the suggestion of the removal but rather so that people who might make a similar mistake have a reference for it in the future. But I do think you have a good point and perhaps I was being a bit hasty, but I still stand by how I handled it.
to:
However, I also would just like to point out that my idea for posting a discussion wasn\'t for the suggestion of the removal but rather so that people who might make a similar mistake have a reference for it in the future. But I do think you have a good point and perhaps I was being a bit hasty, but I still stand by how I handled it.
