Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / Zootopia

Go To

[003] rva98014 Current Version

2nd Oct '17 at 07:08:04 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

I'd vote no. Several times in the past, we've had people unilaterally decide to re-categorize the characters (which is why there's the comment in the code to please start a discussion first..... Thank you for doing so, BTW).

to:

I\'d vote no. Several times in the past, we\'ve had people unilaterally decide to re-categorize the characters (which is why there\'s the comment in the code to please start a discussion first..... Thank you for doing so, BTW).

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

It always ended up with categories that only had 2-3 characters in it with one big

to:

It always ended up with categories that only had 2-3 characters in it with one big \"Misc\" or \"Other\" category at the end (your proposed organization would have 14 characters lumped here). Plus there\'d often be some categories where a character didn\'t really fit (Are Fru-Fru and Manchas really part of the Mafia?).

I personally just don\'t see much value in trying to granularize them beyond \"Zootopia Residents\" even if it does make that category somewhat large.

[002] rva98014

2nd Oct '17 at 07:07:12 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

I'd vote no. Several times in the past, we've had people unilaterally decide to re-categorize the characters (which is why there's the comment in the code to start a discussion first).

to:

I\'d vote no. Several times in the past, we\'ve had people unilaterally decide to re-categorize the characters (which is why there\'s the comment in the code to please start a discussion first..... Thank you for doing so, BTW).

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

It always ended up with categories that only had 2-3 characters in it with one big

to:

It always ended up with categories that only had 2-3 characters in it with one big \"Misc\" or \"Other\" category at the end (your proposed organization would have 14 characters lumped here). Plus there\'d always be some categories where a character didn\'t really fit (Are Fru-Fru and Manchas really part of the Mafia?).

I personally just don\'t see much value in trying to granularize them beyond \"Zootopia Residents\" even if it does make that category somewhat large.

[001] rva98014

2nd Oct '17 at 07:06:18 AM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

I'd vote no. We've tried several times in the past to categorize the characters and it always ended up with categories that only had 2-3 characters in it with one big

to:

I\'d vote no. Several times in the past, we\'ve had people unilaterally decide to re-categorize the characters (which is why there\'s the comment in the code to start a discussion first).

It always ended up with categories that only had 2-3 characters in it with one big \"Misc\" or \"Other\" category at the end (your proposed organization would have 14 characters lumped here). Plus there\'d always be some categories where a character didn\'t really fit (Are Fru-Fru and Manchas really part of the Mafia?).

I personally just don\'t see much value in trying to granularize them beyond \"Zootopia Residents\" even if it does make that category somewhat large.

Top