Tropes Media Browse Indexes Forums Videos Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Tools
Cut List New Edits Edit Reasons Launches Images List Crowner Activity Un-typed Pages Recent Page Type Changes Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects Cross Wicking Tips for Editing Text Formatting Rules Glossary Edit Reasons Handling Spoilers Word Cruft Administrivia FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us Contact Us Advertise DMCA Notice Privacy Policy Report Bug
Go Ad-Free Changelog
  • Show Spoilers
  • Night Vision
  • Sticky Header
  • Highlight Links
 

Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / Zootopia

Go To
[002] BURGINABC Current Version
26th Sep '17 at 05:57:12 PM
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You said the Doylist reason for why he doesn't talk is that he has no voice actor, but that seems dubious to me. Obviously, this wasn't a low budget production where they can't afford to hire VAs for minor characters. If they wanted to, they could have easily gotten him a voice actor even if it was just to speak one line.
to:
You said the Doylist reason for why he doesn\'t talk is that he has no voice actor, but that seems dubious to me. Obviously, this wasn\'t a low budget production where they can\'t afford to hire VAs for minor characters. If they wanted to, they could have easily gotten him a voice actor even if it was just to speak one line.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The Doylist reason for him not speaking, then, is that the screenwriters didn't ''want'' him to speak. I doubt external constraints were a factor.
to:
The Doylist reason for him not speaking, then, is that the screenwriters didn\'t \'\'want\'\' him to speak. I doubt external constraints were a factor.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
This still leaves open the question of whether there's a story trope in play for his silence, or if it's just an incidental product of how brief the scene was.
to:
This still leaves open the question of whether there\'s a story trope or character trope in play relating to his silence, or if it\'s just an incidental product of how brief the scene was.
[001] BURGINABC
26th Sep '17 at 05:54:16 PM
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
You said the Doylist reason for why he doesn't talk is that he has no voice actor, but that seems dubious to me. Obviously, this wasn't a low budget production where they can't afford to hire VAs for minor characters. If they wanted to, they could have easily gotten him a voice actor even if it was just to speak one line.
to:
You said the Doylist reason for why he doesn\'t talk is that he has no voice actor, but that seems dubious to me. Obviously, this wasn\'t a low budget production where they can\'t afford to hire VAs for minor characters. If they wanted to, they could have easily gotten him a voice actor even if it was just to speak one line.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The Doylist reason for him not speaking, then, is that the screenwriters didn't ''want'' him to speak. I doubt external constraints were a factor.
to:
The Doylist reason for him not speaking, then, is that the screenwriters didn\'t \'\'want\'\' him to speak. I doubt external constraints were a factor.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
This still leaves open the question of whether there's a trope in play for his silence, or if it's just an incidental product of how brief the scene was.
to:
This still leaves open the question of whether there\'s a story trope in play for his silence, or if it\'s just an incidental product of how brief the scene was.

Important Links

Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Resources
Top