[006]
Emu0
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
2.)
to:
2.) \"Squadmate\" romances doesn\'t actually sound better out of context, it just sounds longer. People who aren\'t convinced by \"lack of options\" won\'t be convinced by that, and people who aren\'t invested in romances won\'t get why people care if they\'re *squadmates*
3.) The phrase \"lack of options\" does not *inherently* imply \"my favorite choice wasn\'t there\". Anyone saying that is simply making assumptions based on their own biases. Preemptively responding to those biases is beyond the scope of a wiki page.
If people really want to mention the lack of a squadmate romance, it\'s probably not a huge deal if it\'s kept short, though I worry that it\'s not as self-explanatory as you think it is. But the achievement argument is just a longer, more obscure way of saying that there were too few options. \"Lack of options\" is perfectly self-explanatory for a reasonable person.
3.) The phrase \"lack of options\" does not *inherently* imply \"my favorite choice wasn\'t there\". Anyone saying that is simply making assumptions based on their own biases. Preemptively responding to those biases is beyond the scope of a wiki page.
If people really want to mention the lack of a squadmate romance, it\'s probably not a huge deal if it\'s kept short, though I worry that it\'s not as self-explanatory as you think it is. But the achievement argument is just a longer, more obscure way of saying that there were too few options. \"Lack of options\" is perfectly self-explanatory for a reasonable person.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
2.)
to:
2.) \"Squadmate\" romances doesn\'t actually sound better out of context, it just sounds longer. People who aren\'t convinced by \"lack of options\" won\'t be convinced by that, and people who aren\'t invested in romances won\'t get why people care if they\'re *squadmates*
3.) The phrase \"lack of options\" does not *inherently* imply \"my favorite choice wasn\'t there\". Anyone saying that is simply making assumptions based on their own biases. Preemptively responding to those biases is beyond the scope of a wiki page.
If people really want to mention the lack of a squadmate romance, it\'s probably not a huge deal if it\'s kept short, though I worry that it\'s not as self-explanatory as you think it is. But the achievement argument is just a longer, more obscure way of saying that there were too few options. \"Lack of options\" is perfectly self-explanatory for a reasonable person.
3.) The phrase \"lack of options\" does not *inherently* imply \"my favorite choice wasn\'t there\". Anyone saying that is simply making assumptions based on their own biases. Preemptively responding to those biases is beyond the scope of a wiki page.
If people really want to mention the lack of a squadmate romance, it\'s probably not a huge deal if it\'s kept short, though I worry that it\'s not as self-explanatory as you think it is. But the achievement argument is just a longer, more obscure way of saying that there were too few options. \"Lack of options\" is perfectly self-explanatory for a reasonable person.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1.) the inability to get the romance achievement is almost always brought up as a way of illustrating the lack of options. Do you really think anyone cares about *getting the achievement*?
to:
1.) the inability to get the romance achievement is almost always brought up as a way of illustrating the lack of options. Do you really think anyone who says that literally cares about *getting the achievement*?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
2.)
to:
2.) \"Squadmate\" romances doesn\'t actually sound better out of context, it just sounds longer. People who aren\'t convinced by \"lack of options\" won\'t be convinced by that, and people who aren\'t invested in romances won\'t get why people care if they\'re *squadmates*
3.) The phrase \"lack of options\" does not *inherently* imply \"my favorite choice wasn\'t there\". Anyone saying that is simply making assumptions based on their own biases. Preemptively responding to those biases is beyond the scope of a wiki page.
If people really want to mention the lack of a squadmate romance, it\'s probably not a huge deal if it\'s kept short, though I worry that it\'s not as self-explanatory as you think it is. But the achievement argument is just a longer, more obscure way of saying that there were too few options. \"Lack of options\" is perfectly self-explanatory for a reasonable person.
3.) The phrase \"lack of options\" does not *inherently* imply \"my favorite choice wasn\'t there\". Anyone saying that is simply making assumptions based on their own biases. Preemptively responding to those biases is beyond the scope of a wiki page.
If people really want to mention the lack of a squadmate romance, it\'s probably not a huge deal if it\'s kept short, though I worry that it\'s not as self-explanatory as you think it is. But the achievement argument is just a longer, more obscure way of saying that there were too few options. \"Lack of options\" is perfectly self-explanatory for a reasonable person.
