[002]
RainbowPhoenix
Current Version
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
By and large, I was not the one adding all those blogposts and
to:
By and large, I was not the one adding all those blogposts and \"diatribes\". At most I added maybe one entry that was later removed with no objection from me and added a few clarifying details to the others. So I have no idea why you are even bringing those up.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong about this, but if you are not an LGBT person yourself, then it\'s really easy for you to look down from on high and claim that pertinent details are \"fluff\" and \"justifying ourselves\". I want to believe that this is not your specific intention, but to be honest I have to say that it looks like you are letting your own biases show and intentionally leading outside viewers to a factually incorrect conclusion just because it makes that particular segment of the fanbase look bad. You have already implied this by stating that you think the gay male fanbase looks petty regardless. As if it\'s petty to be blatantly treated as less than while playing into tropes with very long homophobic histories. That calls into question your motives in insisting that the situation be made out to be more ambiguous than it actually is.
Now, I have already made an effort to compromise about keeping things as concise as possible while still making the situation as clear as possible. If you have any suggestions on how to do so, I am all ears, but the ambiguity you are currently insisting on is unacceptable.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong about this, but if you are not an LGBT person yourself, then it\'s really easy for you to look down from on high and claim that pertinent details are \"fluff\" and \"justifying ourselves\". I want to believe that this is not your specific intention, but to be honest I have to say that it looks like you are letting your own biases show and intentionally leading outside viewers to a factually incorrect conclusion just because it makes that particular segment of the fanbase look bad. You have already implied this by stating that you think the gay male fanbase looks petty regardless. As if it\'s petty to be blatantly treated as less than while playing into tropes with very long homophobic histories. That calls into question your motives in insisting that the situation be made out to be more ambiguous than it actually is.
Now, I have already made an effort to compromise about keeping things as concise as possible while still making the situation as clear as possible. If you have any suggestions on how to do so, I am all ears, but the ambiguity you are currently insisting on is unacceptable.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
By and large, I was not the one adding all those blogposts and
to:
By and large, I was not the one adding all those blogposts and \"diatribes\". At most I added maybe one entry that was later removed with no objection from me and added a few clarifying details to the others. So I have no idea why you are even bringing those up.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong about this, but if you are not an LGBT person yourself, then it\'s really easy for you to look down from on high and claim that pertinent details are \"fluff\" and \"justifying ourselves\". I want to believe that this is not your specific intention, but to be honest I have to say that it looks like you are letting your own biases show and intentionally leading outside viewers to a factually incorrect conclusion just because it makes that particular segment of the fanbase look bad. You have already implied this by stating that you think the gay male fanbase looks petty regardless. As if it\'s petty to be blatantly treated as less than while playing into tropes with very long homophobic histories. That calls into question your motives in insisting that the situation be made out to be more ambiguous than it actually is.
Now, I have already made an effort to compromise about keeping things as precise as possible while still making the situation as clear as possible. If you have any suggestions on how to do so, I am all ears, but the ambiguity you are currently insisting on is unacceptable.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong about this, but if you are not an LGBT person yourself, then it\'s really easy for you to look down from on high and claim that pertinent details are \"fluff\" and \"justifying ourselves\". I want to believe that this is not your specific intention, but to be honest I have to say that it looks like you are letting your own biases show and intentionally leading outside viewers to a factually incorrect conclusion just because it makes that particular segment of the fanbase look bad. You have already implied this by stating that you think the gay male fanbase looks petty regardless. As if it\'s petty to be blatantly treated as less than while playing into tropes with very long homophobic histories. That calls into question your motives in insisting that the situation be made out to be more ambiguous than it actually is.
Now, I have already made an effort to compromise about keeping things as precise as possible while still making the situation as clear as possible. If you have any suggestions on how to do so, I am all ears, but the ambiguity you are currently insisting on is unacceptable.
