Tropes Media Browse Indexes Forums Videos Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Tools
Cut List New Edits Edit Reasons Launches Images List Crowner Activity Un-typed Pages Recent Page Type Changes Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects Cross Wicking Tips for Editing Text Formatting Rules Glossary Edit Reasons Handling Spoilers Word Cruft Administrivia FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us Contact Us Advertise DMCA Notice Privacy Policy Report Bug
Go Ad-Free Changelog
  • Show Spoilers
  • Night Vision
  • Sticky Header
  • Highlight Links
 

Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / Zootopia

Go To
[003] BURGINABC Current Version
28th May '17 at 02:57:12 PM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Hmm... I still prefer option 3. Not only does it sidestep the difficult issue of what Aversions are notable, but I've found another reason to prefer it: that the element of his characterization being described is deeply rooted in the SophisticatedAsHell example, with that example really being the one in-film occurrence that implies he's been to a shrink, and with the [[WordOfGod Twitter statement]] being little more than a confirmation that this implication was intentional on the part of the writers.
to:
Hmm... I still prefer option 3. Not only does it sidestep the difficult issue of what Aversions are notable, but I\'ve found another reason to prefer it: that the element of his characterization being described is deeply rooted in the SophisticatedAsHell example, with that example really being the one in-film occurrence that implies he\'s been to a shrink, and with the [[WordOfGod Twitter statement]] being little more than a confirmation that this implication was intentional on the part of the writers.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
This is not to say that author comments can't be useful or insightful when analyzing a work. I think they have a place in main trope pages and character sheets, but only to add flavor to examples that can clearly be placed in the work, not as a source of examples in itself. While definitely still of great interest, after-the-fact assertions by the authors must be kept subordinate to the actual work being analyzed.
to:
This is not to say that author comments can\'t be useful or insightful when analyzing a work. I think they have a place in main trope pages and character sheets, but only to add flavor to examples that can clearly be placed in the work, not as a source of examples in itself. While definitely still of great interest, after-the-fact assertions by the authors must be kept subordinate to the actual work being analyzed.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
I think the whole of it can be subsumed into the SophisticatedAsHell example, with it being a fairly unique and creative use of that trope to subtly convey characterization
to:
I think the whole of it can be subsumed into the SophisticatedAsHell example, with it being a fairly unique and creative use of that trope to subtly imply some background details as to the nature of a character\'s off-screen [[CharacterDevelopment development]].
[002] BURGINABC
28th May '17 at 02:50:56 PM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Hmm... I still prefer option 3. Not only does it sidestep the difficult issue of what Aversions are notable, but I've found another reason to prefer it: that the element of his characterization being described is deeply rooted in the SophisticatedAsHell example, with that example really being the one in-film occurrence that implies he's been to a shrink, and with the [[WordOfGod Twitter statement]] being little more than a confirmation that this implication was intentional on the part of the writers.
to:
Hmm... I still prefer option 3. Not only does it sidestep the difficult issue of what Aversions are notable, but I\'ve found another reason to prefer it: that the element of his characterization being described is deeply rooted in the SophisticatedAsHell example, with that example really being the one in-film occurrence that implies he\'s been to a shrink, and with the [[WordOfGod Twitter statement]] being little more than a confirmation that this implication was intentional on the part of the writers.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
This is not to say that author comments can't be useful or insightful when analyzing a work. I think they have a place in main trope pages and character sheets, but only to add flavor to examples that can clearly be placed in the work, not as a source of examples in itself. While definitely still of great interest, after-the-fact assertions by the authors must be kept subordinate to the actual work being analyzed.
to:
This is not to say that author comments can\'t be useful or insightful when analyzing a work. I think they have a place in main trope pages and character sheets, but only to add flavor to examples that can clearly be placed in the work, not as a source of examples in itself. While definitely still of great interest, after-the-fact assertions by the authors must be kept subordinate to the actual work being analyzed.

I think the whole of it can be subsumed into the SophisticatedAsHell example, with it being a fairly unique and creative use of that trope to subtly convey characterization
[001] BURGINABC
28th May '17 at 02:46:13 PM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Hmm... I still prefer option 3. Not only does it sidestep the difficult issue of what Aversions are notable, but I've found another reason to prefer it: that the element of his characterization being described is deeply rooted the SophisticatedAsHell example, with that example really being the one in-film occurrence that implies he's been to a shrink, and with the [[WordOfGod Twitter statement]] being little more than a confirmation that this implication was intentional on the part of the writers.
to:
Hmm... I still prefer option 3. Not only does it sidestep the difficult issue of what Aversions are notable, but I\'ve found another reason to prefer it: that the element of his characterization being described is deeply rooted in the SophisticatedAsHell example, with that example really being the one in-film occurrence that implies he\'s been to a shrink, and with the [[WordOfGod Twitter statement]] being little more than a confirmation that this implication was intentional on the part of the writers.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
This is not to say that author comments can't be useful or insightful when analyzing a work. I think they have a place in main trope pages and character sheets, but only to add flavor to examples that can clearly be placed in the work, not as a source of examples in itself. While definitely still of great interest, after-the-fact assertions by the authors must be kept subordinate to the actual work being analyzed.
to:
This is not to say that author comments can\'t be useful or insightful when analyzing a work. I think they have a place in main trope pages and character sheets, but only to add flavor to examples that can clearly be placed in the work, not as a source of examples in itself. While definitely still of great interest, after-the-fact assertions by the authors must be kept subordinate to the actual work being analyzed.

Important Links

Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Resources
Top