[004]
Lorealie
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
What was wrong with expanding Link's Celibate Hero status to include more than just a backhanded biased reference towards Mipha? That was my initial solution and in accordance to Arawn999's rewording suggestion your threw away. And it was never disputed because the game is still very new so this is a faulty argument. And no I didn't, if you read the page you can see that since I didn't change nearly as much as you seem to think I did. You keep forcing a trope back on here you ''made'' toxic when it isn't needed as it's absence is explained for editors as readers can still affectively read the example under
to:
What was wrong with expanding Link\'s Celibate Hero status to include more than just a backhanded biased reference towards Mipha? That was my initial solution and in accordance to Arawn999\'s rewording suggestion your threw away. And it was never disputed because the game is still very new so this is a faulty argument. And no I didn\'t, if you read the page you can see that since I didn\'t change nearly as much as you seem to think I did. You keep forcing a trope back on here you \'\'made\'\' toxic when it isn\'t needed as it\'s absence is explained for editors as readers can still affectively read the example under \"Ship Tease\". It\'s the point of the argument as we can\'t agree on which girl it suits better if only one can have it, not Celibate Hero which has no room for debate. so it shouldn\'t be there until the third party you contacted gets here.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
What was wrong with expanding Link's Celibate Hero status to include more than just a backhanded biased reference towards Mipha? That was my initial solution and in accordance to Arawn999's rewording suggestion your threw away. And it was never disputed because the game is still very new so this is a faulty argument. And no I didn't, if you read the page you can see that since I didn't change nearly as much as you seem to think I did. You keep forcing a trope back on here you ''made'' toxic when it isn't needed as it's absence is explained for editors as readers can still affectively read the example under
to:
What was wrong with expanding Link\'s Celibate Hero status to include more than just a backhanded biased reference towards Mipha? That was my initial solution and in accordance to Arawn999\'s rewording suggestion your threw away. And it was never disputed because the game is still very new so this is a faulty argument. And no I didn\'t, if you read the page you can see that since I didn\'t change nearly as much as you seem to think I did. You keep forcing a trope back on here you \'\'made\'\' toxic when it isn\'t needed as it\'s absence is explained for editors as readers can still affectively read the example under \"Ship Tease\". It\'s the point of the argument as we can\'t agree on which girl it suits better if only one can have it, not Celibate Hero which has no room for debate. so it shouldn\'t be there until the third party you contacted gets here.
Edit: I saw that you removed all references to the Implied Love Interest debate from Celibate Hero and see no reason why it can\'t be made visable again.
Edit: I saw that you removed all references to the Implied Love Interest debate from Celibate Hero and see no reason why it can\'t be made visable again.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
What was wrong with expanding Link's Celibate Hero status to include more than just a backhanded biased reference towards Mipha? That was my initial solution and in accordance to Arawn999's rewording suggestion your threw away. And it was never disputed because the game is still very new so this is a faulty argument. And no I didn't, if you read the page you can see that since I didn't change nearly as much as you seem to think I did. You keep forcing a trope back on here you ''made'' toxic when it isn't needed as it's absence is explained for editors as readers can still affectively read the example under
to:
What was wrong with expanding Link\'s Celibate Hero status to include more than just a backhanded biased reference towards Mipha? That was my initial solution and in accordance to Arawn999\'s rewording suggestion your threw away. And it was never disputed because the game is still very new so this is a faulty argument. And no I didn\'t, if you read the page you can see that since I didn\'t change nearly as much as you seem to think I did. You keep forcing a trope back on here you \'\'made\'\' toxic when it isn\'t needed as it\'s absence is explained for editors as readers can still affectively read the example under \"Ship Tease\". It\'s the point of the argument as we can\'t agree on which girl it suits better if only one can have it, not Celibate Hero which has no room for debate. so it shouldn\'t be there until the third party you contacted gets here.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
What was wrong with expanding Link's Celibate Hero status to include more than just a backhanded biased reference towards Mipha? That was my initial solution and in accordance to Arawn999's rewording suggestion your threw away. And it was never disputed because the game is still very new so this is a faulty argument. And no I didn't, if you read the page you can see that since I didn't change nearly as much as you seem to think I did.
to:
What was wrong with expanding Link\'s Celibate Hero status to include more than just a backhanded biased reference towards Mipha? That was my initial solution and in accordance to Arawn999\'s rewording suggestion your threw away. And it was never disputed because the game is still very new so this is a faulty argument. And no I didn\'t, if you read the page you can see that since I didn\'t change nearly as much as you seem to think I did. You keep forcing a trope back on here you \'\'made\'\' toxic when it isn\'t needed as it\'s absence is explained for editors as readers can still affectively read the example under \"Ship Tease\". It\'s the point of the argument so it shouldn\'t be there until the third party you contacted gets here.
