[002]
Venatius
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Sheesh. From reading some of the topics below, it sounds like this page used to be even heavier on the negativity. That's kind of surprising. I was swinging by here to suggest a little delicate pruning might be called for, because the main page is full of downright incessant criticism and needling. It's not that I even necessarily disagree with a lot of it, but in a lot of cases it seems a bit tangential, sometimes spinning off into pointing out agendas/writing flaws/etc. that aren't even directly relevant to a specific trope entry. The one that finally inclined me to drop by here was the command that the reader
to:
Sheesh. From reading some of the topics below, it sounds like this page used to be even heavier on the negativity. That\'s kind of surprising. I was swinging by here to suggest a little delicate pruning might be called for, because the main page is full of downright incessant criticism and needling. It\'s not that I even necessarily disagree with a lot of it, but in a lot of cases it seems a bit tangential, sometimes spinning off into pointing out agendas/writing flaws/etc. that aren\'t even directly relevant to a specific trope entry. The one that finally inclined me to drop by here was the command that the reader \"note\" certain undertones of the final \"where are they now\" strip - which is pretty irrelevant to that particular trope. Including widely noted criticisms is well and good, and quite a few of them I do even agree with, but it ends up reading like most of the article was written by one person with one specific viewpoint on the comic that they really, really want you to see it from. I think it\'s mainly how certain very specific criticisms keep popping up again, and again, and again, across various trope entries that often aren\'t even directly related to those criticisms.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Sheesh. From reading some of the topics below, it sounds like this page used to be even heavier on the negativity. That's kind of surprising. I was swinging by here to suggest a little delicate pruning might be called for, because the main page is full of downright incessant criticism and needling. It's not that I even necessarily disagree with a lot of it, but in a lot of cases it seems a bit tangential, sometimes spinning off into pointing out agendas/writing flaws/etc. that aren't even directly relevant to a specific trope entry. The one that finally inclined me to drop by here was the irrelevant command that the reader
to:
Sheesh. From reading some of the topics below, it sounds like this page used to be even heavier on the negativity. That\'s kind of surprising. I was swinging by here to suggest a little delicate pruning might be called for, because the main page is full of downright incessant criticism and needling. It\'s not that I even necessarily disagree with a lot of it, but in a lot of cases it seems a bit tangential, sometimes spinning off into pointing out agendas/writing flaws/etc. that aren\'t even directly relevant to a specific trope entry. The one that finally inclined me to drop by here was the command that the reader \"note\" certain undertones of the final \"where are they now\" strip - which is pretty irrelevant to that particular trope. Including widely noted criticisms is well and good, and quite a few of them I do even agree with, but it ends up reading like most of the article was written by one person with one specific viewpoint on the comic that they really, really want you to see it from.
