[003]
FranksGirl
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
With regards to {{Chickification}}, FauxActionGirl, and {{Wimpification}}, the tropes themselves belong on this index; no question there. But I've seen multiple edits to these three entries trying to make them
to:
With regards to {{Chickification}}, FauxActionGirl, and {{Wimpification}}, the tropes themselves belong on this index; no question there. But I\'ve seen multiple edits to these three entries trying to make them \"feminist\" or \"LGBT\" audience reactions, as if only feminists or LGBT folks will be upset about these tropes happening to care. That\'s not the case. The {{Chickification}} entry, in particular, has had several edits where folks have made the entry neutral, in terms of a general audience reaction, only for other editors to go back and add in wording that sounds like a sneer towards anyone who dares get upset over it.
Those tropes are NOT feminist- or LGBT-only reactions. They are general reactions. Most fans get heartily annoyed if a character suddenly gets wimpified, chickified, and faux-actioned, period.
Those tropes are NOT feminist- or LGBT-only reactions. They are general reactions. Most fans get heartily annoyed if a character suddenly gets wimpified, chickified, and faux-actioned, period.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
With regards to {{Chickification}}, FauxActionGirl, and {{Wimpification}}, the tropes themselves belong on this index; no question there. But I've seen multiple edits to these three entries trying to make them
to:
With regards to {{Chickification}}, FauxActionGirl, and {{Wimpification}}, the tropes themselves belong on this index; no question there. But I\'ve seen multiple edits to these three entries trying to make them \"feminist\" or \"LGBT\" audience reactions, as if only feminists or LGBT folks will be upset about these tropes happening to care. That\'s not the case. The {{Chickification}} entry, in particular, has had several edits where folks have made the entry neutral, in terms of a general audience reaction, only for other editors to go back and add in wording that sounds like a sneer towards anyone who dares get upset over it.
Those tropes are NOT feminist- or LGBT-only reactions. They are general reactions. Most fans get heartily annoyed if a character suddenly gets wimpified, period.
Those tropes are NOT feminist- or LGBT-only reactions. They are general reactions. Most fans get heartily annoyed if a character suddenly gets wimpified, period.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
With regards to {{Chickification}}, FauxActionGirl, and {{Wimpification}}, the tropes themselves belong on this index; no question there. But I've seen multiple edits to these three entries trying to make them
to:
With regards to {{Chickification}}, FauxActionGirl, and {{Wimpification}}, the tropes themselves belong on this index; no question there. But I\'ve seen multiple edits to these three entries trying to make them \"feminist\" or \"LGBT\" audience reactions, as if only feminists or LGBT folks will be upset about these tropes happening to care. That\'s not the case. The {{Chickification}} entry, in particular, has had several edits where folks have made the entry neutral, in terms of a general audience reaction, only for other editors to go back and add in wording that sounds like a snide comment towards anyone who dares get upset over it.
Those tropes are NOT feminist- or LGBT-only reactions. They are general reactions. Most fans get heartily annoyed if a character suddenly gets wimpified, period.
Those tropes are NOT feminist- or LGBT-only reactions. They are general reactions. Most fans get heartily annoyed if a character suddenly gets wimpified, period.
