[002]
TheHestinator
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The recent addition of a section comparing the MPAA ratings to the levels on this scale seems like a good idea, but I don't think that it's quite accurate at this point. For example, I don't think G-rated movies are allowed to show any true violence these days (yes, the G-rated The Longest Day is in Level 2, but that film was rated before the MPAA knew what it was doing). Hell, I think that if a filmmaker puts characters in dangerous situations in their movie, the MPAA will slap a PG-rating on it with a note that it contains
to:
The recent addition of a section comparing the MPAA ratings to the levels on this scale seems like a good idea, but I don\'t think that it\'s quite accurate at this point. For example, I don\'t think G-rated movies are allowed to show any true violence these days (yes, the G-rated The Longest Day is in Level 2, but that film was rated before the MPAA knew what it was doing). Hell, I think that if a filmmaker puts characters in dangerous situations in their movie, the MPAA will slap a PG-rating on it with a note that it contains \"mild peril\" or something like that. Also, it seems like nowadays that any depiction of fatal violence or blood in a violent context gets you a PG-13-rating, although there may be some exceptions to this.
So, what I\'m trying to say is, the MPAA ratings/Mohs Scale of Violence Hardness levels comparison section should look something more like this:
G: 0;
PG: 1-2;
PG-13: 2-7;
R: 6-10;
NC-17: 10
Yes, there is some overlap between the territory covered by the ratings. For example, levels 6 and 7 are generally a wild card between PG-13 and R. These new correlations reflect the modern standards the MPAA uses, rather than the ones they used prior to the creation of PG-13 and whatnot.
Does anybody else agree that the scale above in this post should replace the one currently in the article?
So, what I\'m trying to say is, the MPAA ratings/Mohs Scale of Violence Hardness levels comparison section should look something more like this:
G: 0;
PG: 1-2;
PG-13: 2-7;
R: 6-10;
NC-17: 10
Yes, there is some overlap between the territory covered by the ratings. For example, levels 6 and 7 are generally a wild card between PG-13 and R. These new correlations reflect the modern standards the MPAA uses, rather than the ones they used prior to the creation of PG-13 and whatnot.
Does anybody else agree that the scale above in this post should replace the one currently in the article?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The recent addition of a section comparing the MPAA ratings to the levels on this scale seems like a good idea, but I don't think that it's quite accurate at this point. For example, I don't think G-rated movies are allowed to show any true violence these days (yes, the G-rated The Longest Day is in Level 2, but that film was rated before the MPAA knew what it was doing). Hell, I think that if a filmmaker puts characters in dangerous situations in their movie, the MPAA will slap a PG-rating on it with a note that it contains
to:
The recent addition of a section comparing the MPAA ratings to the levels on this scale seems like a good idea, but I don\'t think that it\'s quite accurate at this point. For example, I don\'t think G-rated movies are allowed to show any true violence these days (yes, the G-rated The Longest Day is in Level 2, but that film was rated before the MPAA knew what it was doing). Hell, I think that if a filmmaker puts characters in dangerous situations in their movie, the MPAA will slap a PG-rating on it with a note that it contains \"mild peril\" or something like that. Also, it seems like nowadays that any depiction of fatal violence or blood in a violent context gets you a PG-13-rating, although there may be some exceptions to this.
So, what I\'m trying to say is, the MPAA ratings/Mohs Scale of Violence Hardness levels comparison section should look something more like this:
G: 0;
PG: 1-2;
PG-13: 2-7;
R: 6-10;
NC-17: 10;
Yes, there is some overlap between the territory covered by the ratings. For example, levels 6 and 7 are generally a wild card between PG-13 and R. These new correlations reflect the modern standards the MPAA uses, rather than the ones they used prior to the creation of PG-13 and whatnot.
Does anybody else agree that the scale above in this post should replace the one currently in the article?
So, what I\'m trying to say is, the MPAA ratings/Mohs Scale of Violence Hardness levels comparison section should look something more like this:
G: 0;
PG: 1-2;
PG-13: 2-7;
R: 6-10;
NC-17: 10;
Yes, there is some overlap between the territory covered by the ratings. For example, levels 6 and 7 are generally a wild card between PG-13 and R. These new correlations reflect the modern standards the MPAA uses, rather than the ones they used prior to the creation of PG-13 and whatnot.
Does anybody else agree that the scale above in this post should replace the one currently in the article?
