[003]
ChrisX
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I admit that I was jumping off conclusions and it was my mistake. But if you look at the current standing and how stuffs of Vishkar was written, I felt like it was carrying the vibes of
to:
I admit that I was jumping off conclusions and it was my mistake. But if you look at the current standing and how stuffs of Vishkar was written, I felt like it was carrying the vibes of \"They cannot be liked. What the hell is wrong with you in trying to find sympathetic values? THEY DON\'T. HATE THEM!\" All I\'m trying is just to maintain at least neutrality, but the favors are really against Vishkar, who sits on the place of \'Cannot be liked, must be hated.\'
Try to read the current article when it comes to Vishkar. It just came off to me that it gets the vibes that Talon seemed better in spite of being a CardCarryingVillain because they\'re honest, whereas hypocrites or people using LightIsNotGood are considered even worse than terrorism. Yes, I did add some of them, but aside of my additions, it already have that feels. Tell me if that one is also \'jumping to conclusion\'.
And if yes, do tell me some of your reasonings that Vishkar can still be gray and \'likable\' in spite of what they did. Something that didn\'t get swept by their other atrocity (For instance, WellIntentionedExtremist. The \'Well-Intention\' part usually gets annulled with the atrocities they have done and not living up to their claims of serving the innocent).
Try to read the current article when it comes to Vishkar. It just came off to me that it gets the vibes that Talon seemed better in spite of being a CardCarryingVillain because they\'re honest, whereas hypocrites or people using LightIsNotGood are considered even worse than terrorism. Yes, I did add some of them, but aside of my additions, it already have that feels. Tell me if that one is also \'jumping to conclusion\'.
And if yes, do tell me some of your reasonings that Vishkar can still be gray and \'likable\' in spite of what they did. Something that didn\'t get swept by their other atrocity (For instance, WellIntentionedExtremist. The \'Well-Intention\' part usually gets annulled with the atrocities they have done and not living up to their claims of serving the innocent).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I admit that I was jumping off conclusions and it was my mistake. But if you look at the current standing and how stuffs of Vishkar was written, I felt like it was carrying the vibes of
to:
I admit that I was jumping off conclusions and it was my mistake. But if you look at the current standing and how stuffs of Vishkar was written, I felt like it was carrying the vibes of \"They cannot be liked. What the hell is wrong with you in trying to find sympathetic values? THEY DON\'T. HATE THEM!\" All I\'m trying is just to maintain at least GreyAndGrayMorality (or if it\'s BlackAndGrayMorality, Talon would be the only obvious \'Black\'), but because Vishkar\'s actions didn\'t sit well with others, they\'re immediately lumped into Black morality, just because.
Try to read the current article when it comes to Vishkar. It just came off to me that it gets the vibes that Talon seemed better in spite of being a CardCarryingVillain because they\'re honest, whereas hypocrites or people using LightIsNotGood are considered even worse than terrorism. Yes, I did add some of them, but aside of my additions, it already have that feels. Tell me if that one is also \'jumping to conclusion\'.
And if yes, do tell me some of your reasonings that Vishkar can still be gray and \'likable\' in spite of what they did. Something that didn\'t get swept by their other atrocity (For instance, WellIntentionedExtremist. The \'Well-Intention\' part usually gets annulled with the atrocities they have done and not living up to their claims of serving the innocent).
Try to read the current article when it comes to Vishkar. It just came off to me that it gets the vibes that Talon seemed better in spite of being a CardCarryingVillain because they\'re honest, whereas hypocrites or people using LightIsNotGood are considered even worse than terrorism. Yes, I did add some of them, but aside of my additions, it already have that feels. Tell me if that one is also \'jumping to conclusion\'.
And if yes, do tell me some of your reasonings that Vishkar can still be gray and \'likable\' in spite of what they did. Something that didn\'t get swept by their other atrocity (For instance, WellIntentionedExtremist. The \'Well-Intention\' part usually gets annulled with the atrocities they have done and not living up to their claims of serving the innocent).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I admit that I was jumping off conclusions and it was my mistake. But if you look at the current standing and how stuffs of Vishkar was written, I felt like it was carrying the vibes of
to:
I admit that I was jumping off conclusions and it was my mistake. But if you look at the current standing and how stuffs of Vishkar was written, I felt like it was carrying the vibes of \"They cannot be liked. What the hell is wrong with you in trying to find sympathetic values? THEY DON\'T. HATE THEM!\"
Try to read the current article when it comes to Vishkar. It just came off to me that it gets the vibes that Talon seemed better in spite of being a CardCarryingVillain because they\'re honest, whereas hypocrites or people using LightIsNotGood are considered even worse than terrorism. Yes, I did add some of them, but aside of my additions, it already have that feels. Tell me if that one is also \'jumping to conclusion\'.
And if yes, do tell me some of your reasonings that Vishkar can still be gray and \'likable\' in spite of what they did. Something that didn\'t get swept by their other atrocity (For instance, WellIntentionedExtremist. The \'Well-Intention\' part usually gets annulled with the atrocities they have done and not living up to their claims of serving the innocent).
Try to read the current article when it comes to Vishkar. It just came off to me that it gets the vibes that Talon seemed better in spite of being a CardCarryingVillain because they\'re honest, whereas hypocrites or people using LightIsNotGood are considered even worse than terrorism. Yes, I did add some of them, but aside of my additions, it already have that feels. Tell me if that one is also \'jumping to conclusion\'.
And if yes, do tell me some of your reasonings that Vishkar can still be gray and \'likable\' in spite of what they did. Something that didn\'t get swept by their other atrocity (For instance, WellIntentionedExtremist. The \'Well-Intention\' part usually gets annulled with the atrocities they have done and not living up to their claims of serving the innocent).
