Tropes Media Browse Indexes Forums Videos Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Tools
Cut List New Edits Edit Reasons Launches Images List Crowner Activity Un-typed Pages Recent Page Type Changes Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects Cross Wicking Tips for Editing Text Formatting Rules Glossary Edit Reasons Handling Spoilers Word Cruft Administrivia FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us Contact Us Advertise DMCA Notice Privacy Policy Report Bug
Go Ad-Free Changelog
  • Show Spoilers
  • Night Vision
  • Sticky Header
  • Highlight Links
 

Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History MediaNotes / ElectronicEntertainmentExpo

Go To
[007] Dark Current Version
23rd Jun '16 at 11:53:06 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn't relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
to:
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn\'t relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It's not what they come to talk about, but that doesn't make it not relevant. It still happens. An event this size in gaming culture has a huge impact, and that these controversies crop up ''because of what happens at the event'' makes them relevant. They're not intended, but they're quite relevant in the context of the event.
to:
It\'s not what they come to talk about, but that doesn\'t make it not relevant. It still happens. An event this size in gaming culture has a huge impact, and that these controversies crop up \'\'because of what happens at the event\'\' makes them relevant. They\'re not intended, but they\'re quite relevant in the context of the event.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
If you don't want it down on the bottom section, fine. I don't agree, but it's a losing battle. That in mind, can I stick a bit in the top section about how E3 time tends to stir up controversies, especially in the modern years, due to the massive intersection of various parts of gaming culture? I think that completely not mentioning how E3 can relight these fires or expose new ones would be, well, off base because it has and does.
to:
If you don\'t want it down on the bottom section, that\'s fair. I don\'t agree, but wikis work on majority opinion. That in mind, can I stick a bit in the top section about how E3 time tends to stir up controversies, especially in the modern years, due to the massive intersection of various parts of gaming culture? I think that completely not mentioning how E3 can relight these fires or expose new ones would be, well, off base because it has and does.
[006] Dark
23rd Jun '16 at 07:44:59 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn't relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
to:
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn\'t relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It's not what they come to talk about, but that doesn't make it not relevant. It still happens. An event this size in gaming culture has a huge impact, and that these controversies crop up ''because of what happens at the event'' makes them relevant. They're not intended, but they're quite relevant in the context of the event.
to:
It\'s not what they come to talk about, but that doesn\'t make it not relevant. It still happens. An event this size in gaming culture has a huge impact, and that these controversies crop up \'\'because of what happens at the event\'\' makes them relevant. They\'re not intended, but they\'re quite relevant in the context of the event.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Can I stick a bit in the top section about how E3 time tends to stir up controversies, especially in the modern years, due to the massive intersection of various parts of gaming culture? I think that completely not mentioning how E3 can relight these fires or expose new ones would be, well, off base because it has and does.
to:
If you don\'t want it down on the bottom section, fine. I don\'t agree, but it\'s a losing battle. That in mind, can I stick a bit in the top section about how E3 time tends to stir up controversies, especially in the modern years, due to the massive intersection of various parts of gaming culture? I think that completely not mentioning how E3 can relight these fires or expose new ones would be, well, off base because it has and does.
[005] Dark
23rd Jun '16 at 07:43:06 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn't relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
to:
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn\'t relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It's not what they come to talk about, but that doesn't make it not relevant. It still happens. An event this size in gaming culture has a huge impact, and that these controversies crop up ''because of what happens at the event'' doesn't make them not relevant. Not intended, yes, but they're quite relevant in the context of the event.
to:
It\'s not what they come to talk about, but that doesn\'t make it not relevant. It still happens. An event this size in gaming culture has a huge impact, and that these controversies crop up \'\'because of what happens at the event\'\' makes them relevant. They\'re not intended, but they\'re quite relevant in the context of the event.
[004] Dark
23rd Jun '16 at 07:42:33 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn't relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
to:
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn\'t relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
Changed line(s) 2 from:
to:
It\'s not what they come to talk about, but that doesn\'t make it not relevant. It still happens. An event this size in gaming culture has a huge impact, and that these controversies crop up \'\'because of what happens at the event\'\' doesn\'t make them not relevant. Not intended, yes, but they\'re quite relevant in the context of the event.
[003] Dark
23rd Jun '16 at 07:34:59 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
¯[==]_(ツ)_/¯
to:
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn\'t relevant to the page, so, okay. I still think mentioning Orlando, even if just to provide context, is needed.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn't relevant to the page, so, okay.
to:
Can I stick a bit in the top section about how E3 time tends to stir up controversies, especially in the modern years, due to the massive intersection of various parts of gaming culture? I think that completely not mentioning how E3 can relight these fires or expose new ones would be, well, off base because it has and does.
[002] Dark
23rd Jun '16 at 07:22:37 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
¯_(ツ)_/¯
to:
¯[=\\=]_(ツ)_/¯
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn't relevant to the page, so, okay.
to:
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn\'t relevant to the page, so, okay.
[001] Dark
23rd Jun '16 at 06:59:51 AM
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
¯_(ツ)_/¯
to:
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn't relevant to the page, so, okay. I'm done editing the page and I'm removing it from my watchlist. Have fun with it.
to:
We clearly have different ideas about what is and isn\'t relevant to the page, so, okay.

Important Links

Ask The Tropers Trope Finder Media Finder Trope Launch Pad Tech Wishlist Reviews Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Resources
Top