Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Horrible / VideoGameGenerations

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does a PetTheDog moment or two invalidate a character's status?
to:
Does a PetTheDog moment or two invalidate a character\'s Complete Monster status?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Sonic '06 doesn't even begin to compare to the sheer ineptitude that is Big Rigs. At least that game can be played the way is somewhat playable and has gameplay and goals. The closest thing Big Rigs has to a goal is to race to the finish, which is rendered moot by the fact that it's literally impossible to lose. Not to mention that the game's cover [[BlatantLies straight up lies]] about its content, painting a very different experience than what's actually in the game.
to:
Sonic \'06 doesn\'t even begin to compare to the sheer ineptitude that is Big Rigs. At least that game is somewhat playable and has somewhat functional gameplay and goals. The closest thing Big Rigs has to a goal is to race to the finish, which is rendered moot by the fact that it\'s literally impossible to lose. Not to mention that the game\'s cover [[BlatantLies straight up lies]] about its content, painting a very different experience than what\'s actually in the game.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Also, the SoBadItsGood page itself states that works can potentially be listed as both it and SoBadItsHorrible (Big Rigs being among the listed examples) and the market for all types of deviancy argument is only valid if the appeal is intentional and/or there are people [[CriticalBacklash who would come to its defense]] if listed (The reason E.T. for Atari isn't listed). I don't think anybody is going to try and defend Big Rigs.
to:
Also, the SoBadItsGood page itself states that works can potentially be listed as both it and SoBadItsHorrible (Big Rigs being among the listed examples) and the market for all types of deviancy argument is only valid if the appeal is intentional and/or there are people [[CriticalBacklash who would come to its defense]] if listed (The reason E.T. for Atari isn\'t listed). I don\'t think anybody is going to try and defend Big Rigs.

Edit: bad grammar is bad
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Sonic '06 doesn't even begin to compare to the sheer ineptitude that is Big Rigs. At least that game can be played the way is somewhat playable and has gameplay and goals. The closest thing Big Rigs has to a goal is to race to the finish, which is rendered moot by the fact that it's literally impossible to lose. Not to mention that the game's cover [[BlantantLies straight up lies]] about its content, painting a very different experience than what's actually in the game.
to:
Sonic \'06 doesn\'t even begin to compare to the sheer ineptitude that is Big Rigs. At least that game can be played the way is somewhat playable and has gameplay and goals. The closest thing Big Rigs has to a goal is to race to the finish, which is rendered moot by the fact that it\'s literally impossible to lose. Not to mention that the game\'s cover [[BlatantLies straight up lies]] about its content, painting a very different experience than what\'s actually in the game.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Also, the SoBadItsGood page itself states that works can potentially be listed as both it and SoBadItsHorrible (Big Rigs being among the listed examples) and the market for all types of deviancy argument is only valid if the appeal is intentional and/or there are people [[CriticalBacklash who would come to its defense]] if listed (The reason E.T. for Atari isn't listed). I don't think anybody is going to try and defend Big Rigs.
to:
Also, the SoBadItsGood page itself states that works can potentially be listed as both it and SoBadItsHorrible (Big Rigs being among the listed examples) and the market for all types of deviancy argument is only valid if the appeal is intentional and/or there are people [[CriticalBacklash who would come to its defense]] if listed (The reason E.T. for Atari isn\'t listed). I don\'t think anybody is going to try and defend Big Rigs.
Top