(current version)
| 30th Jun '23 at 03:30:38 AM | Mrph1 |
line 9 changed to:
This is all based on the works' release dates, not casting announcement or production dates.
was:
This is all based on the works' release dates, not production dates.
| 30th Jun '23 at 03:29:39 AM | Mrph1 |
line 3 changed to:
RoleReprise already has a '''5 year NREP''' rule, but there have been ATT and forum queries about this, as some aspects seem unclear or ambiguous. The crowner is intended to reach a consensus and resolve that. Specifically, the proposal is that:
was:
RoleReprise already has a '''5 year NREP''' rule, but there have been ATT and forum queries about this, as some aspects seem unclear or ambiguous. The crowner is intended to reach a consensus and resolve that.
was:
Specifically, the proposal is that:
| 30th Jun '23 at 03:29:11 AM | Mrph1 |
was:
----
[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15523303630A12937700 Vote here]]
line 12 changed to:
This is all based on the works' release dates, not production dates.
----
[[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15523303630A12937700 Vote here]]
| 30th Jun '23 at 03:28:04 AM | Mrph1 |
line 3 changed to:
RoleReprise already has a '''5 year NREP''' rule, but there have been ATT and forum queries about this, as some aspects seem unclear or ambiguous. The crowner is intended to reach a consensus and resolve that.
was:
RoleReprise already has a '''5 year NREP'''rule, but there have been ATT and forum queries about this, as some aspects seem unclear or ambiguous. The crowner is intended to reach a consensus and resolve that.
