Does the format of the Vault Disney page look applicable?
I apologize for double posting, but may I suggest rewording, "This title was supposed to go into the Vault on such-and-such date" to something like, "This title was assumed to go into the Vault on such-and-such date"? Unless you work for Disney, it might sound too presumptuous to claim that you know when they were "supposed" to do something, and imply (intentionally or not) that the title remains in print only because someone at the company screwed up.
I'm just reprinting what the moratorium date was on the Other Wiki.
If you mean to say that you found the disproven dates for the Cinderella, Little Mermaid, Jungle Book, Sleeping Beauty, and 101 Dalmatians Diamond Editions going to the Vault on the Other Wiki, do you feel sure that whoever posted them there works/worked for Disney? I also just remembered I meant to say, "expected", not, "assumed".
edited 26th Jun '16 3:54:25 PM by dsneybuf
Yeah, I guess I can do that. Might need to think about how to structure it, first.