Poor Image: Literature.Mr Men

The image is watermarked. While not massively intrusive it is rather frustrating. Not sure where to get a better one, IRC the backs of the books have images on them of other Mr Men, but the one we have now shows far more. I did a Google Image search and, wow Rule 34 Mr Men. My childhood will never be the same again...

Oh, and I appolgise for the mistake I made in the title that leads the link to nowhere. Its been a while and I forgot how Namespaces work in relation to that.

edited 23rd Jan '15 7:41:16 AM by grrr

I fixed the link. Part of the problem was that you put the period with the abbreviation; it should've been Literature/MrMen

The pic's a definite insta-pull.

http://mrmen.com/characters/index.html Click "Shuffle 'Em Up!" on the bottom to see two group shots.

That would work, but it is rather big, particularly if we want to use both groups. Mind you, most works with Loads And Loads Of Characters don't have to have a full cast as a page image, we could just go with an image or Mr Tickle (as he was the first).

edited 23rd Jan '15 11:38:58 PM by grrr

Problem is rodneyAnonymous, that's only half the cast, and if we are going to do a whole cast, we should probably make sure to include the whole cast. Looking at the article, even one of thse would risk poking down into the examples.

I don't think having the whole cast is necessary. 5 works.

Most work page image doesn't feature the entire cast of the media in question. 5 is perfect.

+1 for 5

Good idea. Which 5?

They are talking about Post 5.

5 is acceptable.

Ah. I suppose that works.

I've gone ahead and put up 5 and adjusted the tag. Caption or no? "And this is only about half of the cast." came to mind, but I'm good with none.

Put it as a caption anyway.

This works. Certainly much better than the original.

I'll put my caption suggestion up but not add it to the tag since there wasn't much discussion. Locking up.

EDIT: Oh, I see it's already been done...cool.

edited 31st Jan '15 9:50:24 PM by Willbyr